HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
<<  <  Page 4/4
Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Design Ideas Forum
Ann R. Thryft   3/6/2013 1:21:00 PM
NO RATINGS
Al, all good points. I suspect we might need to monitor and moderate the discussions a bit so they're more focused than what happens here on the comments page.



ttemple
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Conflict of interest
ttemple   3/6/2013 11:56:05 AM
NO RATINGS
Ann,

I think engineers should be careful about what they post on this type of outlet, especially if it could be considered intellectual property of their employer.  I frequently post opinions and thoughts on experiences from my past lives, but I wouldn't divulge anything that might compromise the competitive position of my employer, or might be construed as intellectual property.  I also try not to divulge information that I would not have been allowed to share from old employers.

Many engineers are forced to sign confidentiality agreements, etc., which are designed to prevent a company from bleeding intellectual property.

ttemple
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Conflict of interest
ttemple   3/6/2013 11:49:22 AM
NO RATINGS
@a.saji

Companies desire to sell good ideas, not give them away.  Once an idea is developed and protected, this is an excellent forum for introducing products.  Many of the articles here are product introduction type articles.

 

apresher
User Rank
Blogger
Design Ideas Forum
apresher   3/6/2013 11:45:02 AM
NO RATINGS
Ann, I think you're onto something but the question is how to introduce topics for specific comment that would be more effective than the current model without getting so general that it degrades and loses focus.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Conflict of interest
Ann R. Thryft   3/6/2013 11:31:15 AM
NO RATINGS
a.saji, I think you're getting the gist of my idea, which is engineers first, and companies second. The savvy ones will view it as you describe.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Conflict of interest
Ann R. Thryft   3/6/2013 11:30:30 AM
NO RATINGS
ttemple, thanks for your feedback. The whole point of this idea is that although we do gets lots of comments of this kind, they're hard to find within all these threads and some not even germane to the topic of the article they're attached to. I also think it should be primarily engineer-focused, and if companies want to participate, great, but they're not likely to be the main users, although their individual engineers might.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Great idea
Ann R. Thryft   3/6/2013 11:28:39 AM
NO RATINGS
Elizabeth, thanks, I think that's a good idea for helping to focus discussions.

a.saji
User Rank
Silver
Re: Conflict of interest
a.saji   3/6/2013 10:51:50 AM
NO RATINGS
"I don't think you will find businesses and companies eager to trade comments and suggestions and ideas."

@ttemple: Why not ? I think it will help them to get an idea about the market in a much more friendly plus freely manner.

ttemple
User Rank
Platinum
Conflict of interest
ttemple   3/6/2013 9:04:09 AM
NO RATINGS
I don't think you will find businesses and companies eager to trade comments and suggestions and ideas.

To an engineer, sharing ideas is altruism.  To a business it is (potentially) giving away intellectual property.

I think that fundamentally Design News is already about sharing ideas for solving design problems.  Most of the articles are promoting new ideas and products.  They get commented on, etc.  Walah! You already have what you are proposing to make!

Elizabeth M
User Rank
Blogger
Great idea
Elizabeth M   3/6/2013 7:11:44 AM
NO RATINGS
Ann, this is a great idea. I, too, am impressed by the level of expertise, knowledge and creativity of our readers. To be able to leverage this in a forum would be helpful to everyone. Perhaps the forum could have topics similar to ones on the Design News site (ie, Automation and Control, Design Hardware and Software etc.) and people could submit ideas and comments, or discuss projects they're working on and seek input on design issues.

<<  <  Page 4/4


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
It took engineers nearly half a century to determine why the SS Schenectady, while docked quietly in a harbor off Portland, Ore. one day, suddenly snapped in half.
The medical devices behind the superbug outbreak at UCLA suffer from a design flaw that experts have been aware of for decades.
Just when you thought mobile technology couldn’t get any more personal, Proctor & Gamble have come up with a way to put your mobile where your mouth is, in the form of a Bluetooth 4.0 connected toothbrush.
The grab bag of plastic and rubber materials featured in this new product slideshow are aimed at lighting applications or automotive uses. The rest are for a wide variety of industries, including aerospace, oil & gas, RF and radar, automotive, building materials, and more.
Made By Monkeys highlights products that somehow slipped by the QC cops.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
2/25/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
12/10/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
11/19/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Mar 9 - 13, Implementing Motor Control Designs with MCUs and FPGAs: An Introduction and Update
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  67


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service