HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Page 1/5  >  >>
Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Battery mess.
Charles Murray   2/21/2013 1:12:07 PM
NO RATINGS
Another story came out yesterday, saying that Boeing intends to provide more space between cells. It's worth mentioning, however, that Boeing's spokespeople are not commenting, so we don't know for sure.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/20/us-boeing-dreamliner-battery-idUSBRE91J0VG20130220

g_ost
User Rank
Gold
Re: Battery mess.
g_ost   2/21/2013 7:55:39 AM
NO RATINGS
"The gaps between the cells will be increased." as immediate solution will allow a breathing space for further improvements. SAFT mentions in their battery manual:

"Un espace de 30 à 50mm doit être laissé libre sous les modules pour permettre la désoperculation des éléments en cas de problème."

Google translation - I love this tool

A space of 30 to 50 mm must be left in the modules to allow uncapping elements in case of problems.

The problem still exist but this short solution will reduce the cascade effect in case of a cell failure and will improve the local cooling - trough enhanced sufrace contact with  the air environment.

Connector
User Rank
Iron
Cause or Effect
Connector   2/20/2013 12:49:30 AM
NO RATINGS
Of course, an active cooling system will add weight and take up space.  That is probably why Boeing chose not to incorporate it.

curious_device
User Rank
Gold
Battery mess.
curious_device   2/19/2013 4:30:08 PM
NO RATINGS
I saw a graphic that Boeing was going to stick a vented containment around the existing battery box.  I doubt that will satisfy the FAA and NTSB. Aside of the whole qualification time lag, why wouldn't they swap the Lion battery units with NiMH-based assemblies?  Since they seem to have the space to put a box around the existing box, they could definitely go to a lower energy density battery technology.

g_ost
User Rank
Gold
Re: smart batteries?
g_ost   2/18/2013 8:05:13 AM
http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ash/ash_programs/hazmat/aircarrier_info/media/Battery_incident_chart.pdf

this link shows some of the aviation incidents involving smoke, fire, extreme heat or explosion - and we continue to fly. 787 battery issue is a marketing issue, I hope the Dreamliner wil not change the name to  Incubusliner.

Dave Palmer
User Rank
Platinum
Re: smart batteries?
Dave Palmer   2/15/2013 11:22:00 AM
NO RATINGS
@g_ost: It's hard to tell whether Airbus's decision to switch to NiCd for the A350 is more about public relations or safety.  They've been flying A350s with lithium-ion batteries successfully so far.  But being able to say that they don't have the "bad" battery chemistry that Boeing has may give Airbus an advantage with customers and regulators.

g_ost
User Rank
Gold
Re: smart batteries?
g_ost   2/15/2013 7:40:04 AM
NO RATINGS
Due to 787 battery problems Airbus dispensed for A350 to the installation of lithium batteries.  The first aircraft will be delivered with cadmium batteries, not lithium batteries. But the first test flights will attend Airbus with lithium batteries. 

bob from maine
User Rank
Platinum
Re: smart batteries?
bob from maine   2/13/2013 5:26:20 PM
For large capacity multi cell series/parallel batteries each series stack typically will have its own controller. If thermal runaway begins in one cell, the consensus seems to be removing the charging current will NOT stop the runaway. See the nfpa link:

http://www.nfpa.org/assets/files/pdf/research/rflithiumionbatterieshazard.pdf 

Other links regarding marine applications of lithium-ion batteries indicate that monitoring the individual cells (series stacks) is absolutely critical to prevent runaway. If this degree of protection is reasonable for a boat, I can't imagine it isn't practiced on an aircraft.

Amclaussen
User Rank
Platinum
Re: How hard are these batteries being used?
Amclaussen   2/13/2013 5:12:36 PM
NO RATINGS
Still unresolved: was the short circuit inside the cell or outside it???

Allen13
User Rank
Iron
Re: smart batteries?
Allen13   2/13/2013 4:55:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes, isolating each cell physically and electrically is doable, at a cost - but, if due to manufacturing defect or degradation over time, a cell develops an internal short, is it sufficient to just stop the charging current?  Or will the stored energy through the short circuit lead to thermal runaway anyway?  Does anybody here know?

Page 1/5  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Samsung's Galaxy line of smartphones used to fare quite well in the repairability department, but last year's flagship S5 model took a tumble, scoring a meh-inducing 5/10. Will the newly redesigned S6 lead us back into star-studded territory, or will we sink further into the depths of a repairability black hole?
Fifteen European research centers have launched EuroCPS to help European companies develop innovative products for the Internet of Things.
Get your Allman Brothers albums ready. The iconic Volkswagen Microbus may be poised for a comeback, and this time it could be electric.
In 2003, the world contained just over 500 million Internet-connected devices. By 2010, this figure had risen to 12.5 billion connected objects, almost six devices per individual with access to the Internet. Now, as we move into 2015, the number of connected 'things' is expected to reach 25 billion, ultimately edging toward 50 billion by the end of the decade.
NASA engineer Brian Trease studied abroad in Japan as a high school student and used to fold fast-food wrappers into cranes using origami techniques he learned in library books. Inspired by this, he began to imagine that origami could be applied to building spacecraft components, particularly solar panels that could one day send solar power from space to be used on earth.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
3/31/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
2/25/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
5/7/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Apr 20 - 24, Taking the Internet of Things to the Cloud
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Last Archived Class
Sponsored by Proto Labs
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service