HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Comments
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
Scott Orlosky
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Great article
Scott Orlosky   1/27/2013 12:03:05 AM
NO RATINGS
I have to say Amen, Greg.  Improper tolerancing is expensive and too few mechanical engineers really learn that in school.  Unfortunately, often the young engineer learns tolerancing by doing it incorrectly.

Dave Wittenberg Mcloone
User Rank
Iron
Re: Great article
Dave Wittenberg Mcloone   1/21/2013 3:35:14 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for your post Charles!  We have 4 colleges/universities in the immediate La Crosse, Wisconsin area.  While we are actively involved with these institutions through internships and other programs we have not considered a manufacturing focused engineering lecture series.  Great idea...thank you for your suggestion.

Greg M. Jung
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Great article
Greg M. Jung   1/20/2013 10:34:33 PM
NO RATINGS
Charles, I completely agree with you.  I'm mentoring and managing several young engineers now and unfortunately they were not taught basic tolerance capabilities for each manufacturing process.  I also agree that these basic manufacturing tolerances should be taught in all engineering colleges.

GlennA
User Rank
Gold
Re: default tolerances
GlennA   1/20/2013 8:33:31 PM
NO RATINGS
T J McDermott;  CAD is a tool for a draftsman (or draughtsman) to create a drawing.  Computer hackers create garbage.  In my AutoCAD course I was taught what the most frequent mistakes made in CAD were.  On my first job in CAD, they were all there.  The most common mistake = all drawinga are drawn full size, but they are scaled to fit the paper size to be printed on.  The first drawing that I worked on would have needed a 300 ft sheet of paper.

And mechanical engineers (in my experience) do not understand that emergency stop and end-of-travel sensors are normally closed circuits.

TJ McDermott
User Rank
Blogger
Re: default tolerances
TJ McDermott   1/20/2013 3:18:27 PM
NO RATINGS
Your engineer didn't change the default tolerance in his CAD software.

This sin is most common coming from electrical engineers who don't normally design the mechanical side of things.

To their credit, electrical engineers have to deal with mechanical types not understanding PNP/NPN circuitry when it comes to sensors.

GlennA
User Rank
Gold
default tolerances
GlennA   1/19/2013 9:12:03 PM
NO RATINGS
I tried to explain to a mechanical engineer that a dimension of 1.000 mm was wrong.  I couldn't get him to understand that the default tolerance was +/- 0.0005 mm ! and the proper dimension should have been 1 mm, since it was not a critical part.  This engineer also dimensioned a 14 foot long square tube frame as 168.000 inches !

tekochip
User Rank
Platinum
Over Specified
tekochip   1/18/2013 7:09:44 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for the article.  I have seen otherwise capable engineers specify ridiculous tolerances over and over again without realizing the cost attached to those tolerances or the assembly problems they produce.  I had one engineer that specified a 7.000" part to fit into a 7.000" slot.  Not only was the part in no way not critical, but the parts wouldn't fit if one came from the cold warehouse.  No matter how hard I tried, he just couldn't understand why it was a problem.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Great article
Charles Murray   1/18/2013 4:58:12 PM
NO RATINGS
This author should make a tour of some of his local colleges and talk to engineering students who are overloaded with theoretical mechanics classes and don't get ANY exposure to manufacturing. As a result, too many new engineers don't know how to design for manufacturability. This kind if insight is invaluable.



Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Conventional wisdom holds that MIT, Cal Tech, and Stanford are three of the country’s best undergraduate engineering schools. Unfortunately, when conventional wisdom visits the topic of best engineering schools, it too often leaves out some of the most distinguished programs that don’t happen to offer PhD-level degrees.
Sherlock Ohms highlights stories told by engineers who have used their deductive reasoning and technical prowess to troubleshoot and solve the most perplexing engineering mysteries.
Airbus Defence and Space has 3D printed titanium brackets for communications satellites. The redesigned, one-piece 3D-printed brackets have better thermal resistance than conventionally manufactured parts, can be produced faster, cost 20% less, and save about 1 kg of weight per satellite.
A group of researchers at the Seoul National University have discovered a way to take material from cigarette butts and turn it into a carbon-based material that’s ideal for storing energy and creating a powerful supercapacitor.
Hacking has a long history in the movies, beginning with Tron and War Games and continuing through The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
9/10/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/17/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
9/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Sep 22 - 26, MCU Software Development – A Step-by-Step Guide (Using a Real Eval Board)
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: September 30 - October 2
Sponsored by Altera
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service