HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
<<  <  Page 5/6  >  >>
bdcst
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Noisier EVs
bdcst   1/17/2013 10:28:32 AM
Car manufacturers are considering making rear video cameras with obstacle alarms standard on future models.  With large LCD touch screens becoming the dashboard norm the display device will already be in place and paid for.  Some vehicles already have radar devices that will signal the driver and/or apply the brakes upon detection of an imminent collision.

As the baby boomer generation greatly expands the elderly driver population, the need for these additional safety devices and even self driving vehicles will become more evident.

I agree that quiet vehicles, in fact all vehicles, should have rear mounted backup alarms.  But that may not reduce the number of children run over by vehicles.

VadimR
User Rank
Gold
Re: Feel ambivalent about this
VadimR   1/17/2013 10:23:13 AM
Blind people are a lot better at listening to subtle noises than the rest of us.  You can hear a car comming (even if it has the engine off) by the tire sounds.

I'd like to see the numbers for pedestrians that were hit by cars; what percentage of them are blind. 

VadimR
User Rank
Gold
Re: Feel ambivalent about this
VadimR   1/17/2013 10:18:23 AM
NO RATINGS
Thanks Charles for a sensible post.

I commute by bicycle most of the year on roads (no bike lanes here), and from my experience, as Charles has pointed out, the engine noise is not audible on most new cars when they are going at 40 or 50mph.  However, I do hear the cars approaching behind me, or rather the tire noise and wind noise the cars are making.  Adding extra cost to the cars and extra noise to our cities based on "seems like a good idea" but without actuall data to support the claims, is absurd.

The argument that noisy cars will save lives is just as absurd as motorcyclists that say their loud pipes save lives.  I used to have a sport bike (Katana 600) with a very loud pipe and I still had cars that would try to run me off the road because they did not see me or hear me when I was right next to them.  Riding that bike or my later quieter bike, there was absolutely no difference in how people didn't pay attention.  Making something louder will not substitute for peoples lack of attention.

richnass
User Rank
Blogger
Re: playing card in the spokes??
richnass   1/17/2013 10:09:28 AM
burntpuppy, I wish you hadn't said that. The memories you bring back of me sticking my 1968 Tom Seaver baseball card into my bike wheel. That could be paying my kids' college tuition. Oh the pain.

bdcst
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Really?
bdcst   1/17/2013 10:08:18 AM
Idiotic safety regulations predate the always on headlight by a few decades!  You might be too young to remember the dual volume level car horn.  But indeed there was an ordinance passed in some States that required vehicles to have a horn with two volume settings. 

Okay, so this could make some sense to reduce noise pollution, if only it wasn't bass ackwards.

You see, the motor vehicle rule was thus.  In the city you had to use the low setting for your car horn.  In the country you were supposed to use the loud setting!!!!????  The concept was to reduce noise pollution levels in our cities. 

You do realize that with the city's much higher ambient noise floor due to all manners of noise generation, density of people, elevated rapid transit trains, construction noise, you really need to keep the vehicle horn loud enough to be heard in a sufficent intensity to shout out its intended warning.

In the countryside a much softer horn would suffice and would be in better keeping with the character of the location.

And yes there were more avoidable fender benders in town due to inaudible car horns.

Oppie
User Rank
Bronze
Noisier EVs
Oppie   1/17/2013 10:02:08 AM
Having been almost backed over five times while walking in a somewhat noisy parking structure, this is a welcome idea.

The Prius, which is the car that I usually have problems with, is absolutely silent in reverse. Its backup lights are so focused that you don't see them unless directly behind the vehicle. Flashing side lights might be a good idea here. There is a backup alarm on the Prius but for unknown reasons, it is in the passenger compartment and not outside! If they do put an auditory warning device (the horn?) on EVs, it should have volume controlled in proportion to ambient noise.

My beef is only with backup where the driver may not have the best visibility. In forward, it is the mutual responsibility of the driver to yield to pedestrians and the pedestrian to be aware (ok, maybe that's a reach) of their environment and act accordingly.

btw- loved the comment about baseball cards in the spokes. Took me back to 1955 <smile>.

bdcst
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Feel ambivalent about this
bdcst   1/17/2013 9:54:14 AM
I'm ambivalent too.  Why do we insist upon increasing the noise of civilization?  It's one reason I now live in the country although I was born and raised in a big city. 

I suppose one could design noisy tires and wheels for low noise vehicles which would provide a retrofit for quiet hybrids or all electric vehicles rather than adding a speaker and electronics to make additional noise.  Will this add yet another vehicle inspection test to check for a properly working anti-stealth noise box?

I can see the lawsuits from the estates of folks run over by vehicles with faulty noise generators!  And I can see high paid lawyers winning huge awards from the vehicle operator, owner or manufacturer when the deceased should have taken ownership of blame for not looking both ways.

Might it be better to equip all new vehicles with some sort of RF beacon transponder that could alert deaf, blind or non-observant folks of the proximity of a moving vehicle heading towards them?  The pedestrian would wear a small device, maybe incorporated into a wrist watch or cell phone handset that would warn them of approaching moving hazards.  And the vehicle driver could also be warned that a deaf or blind pedestrian was lurking between parked vehicles ready to lurch out into the lane of traffic.

Heck, you could also provide dog collars to help reduce the death of pets from being run over by vehicles.  And in rural areas the State fish and game departments could put RF collars on the deer herd.  Well maybe not, as I'm sure a clever hunter/engineer might use same during hunting season to get the upper hand on bringing home the venison.

If you look at mail order catalogs from outdoors marketers you can find whistles designed to be affixed to motor vehicles with the intention of warning wildlife of your presence.  They don't work! 

Imagine this scenario.  On a street corner an offical from local government department of transprotation is holding a sound pressure meter.  But instead of looking for vehicles that are louder than permitted, i.e. a bypassed muffler, they are looking to pull over vehicles that are too quiet!

 

JRoque
User Rank
Gold
Really?
JRoque   1/17/2013 9:50:39 AM
Hi. I was ready to call the NHTSA some choice names but I see my fellow EEs have taken care of that. Ok I can't help it: this is stupid!


First was the equally idiotic daylight running lights because we were already too distracted to notice the oncoming car. Now, after improving our cars to make them as quiet as possible, we need to add the noise back in.


Really? What's next, the horn will be always on as soon as you start the car? Every car must have a disco ball install on top to project flashing beams out and be noticed? Large trees will be fitted with 150dB sirens to warn us they're there! Noise cancelling headsets will be reversed to amplify every minute sound around us. People will be made to wear whoopee cushions under their shoes so they make noise with every step... god forbid someone might bump into another while walking.

 

 

Constitution_man
User Rank
Gold
Re: Feel ambivalent about this
Constitution_man   1/17/2013 9:49:08 AM
A Prius made contact with me in Paris, nobody hurt... but it could have been far worse.  This is one of those things that I do not feel ambivalent about.  30 bucks of product cost is a BARGAIN if you want to look at automotive mandates and compare... airbags, seat belts, energy absorbing bumpers, bolster-absorption interior design, recyclability, speed-sensitive features, ABS [I liked 4-wheel non-ABS Disc brakes better].  This one's cheap and effective.  I hate regulations as much as the next guy but I don't want to run over blind people either.

greenewr
User Rank
Silver
Another stupid idea...
greenewr   1/17/2013 9:44:46 AM
For years the goal was to make cars quieter.  Environmental noise pollution is real and persistent.  And now the NHTSA want to make our cars noisy?!  Completely ridiculous.  If you care about quiet, voice your opposition to this rule at:

http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=NHTSA-2011-0148-0075

 

This link is to the federal register and the NPRM (Notice of proposed rule-making) for Docket NHTSA-2011-0148.  There should be a 'Comment Now' button on the upper right.  Tell them what you think.

 

 

<<  <  Page 5/6  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Conventional wisdom holds that MIT, Cal Tech, and Stanford are three of the country’s best undergraduate engineering schools. Unfortunately, when conventional wisdom visits the topic of best engineering schools, it too often leaves out some of the most distinguished programs that don’t happen to offer PhD-level degrees.
Sherlock Ohms highlights stories told by engineers who have used their deductive reasoning and technical prowess to troubleshoot and solve the most perplexing engineering mysteries.
Airbus Defence and Space has 3D printed titanium brackets for communications satellites. The redesigned, one-piece 3D-printed brackets have better thermal resistance than conventionally manufactured parts, can be produced faster, cost 20% less, and save about 1 kg of weight per satellite.
A group of researchers at the Seoul National University have discovered a way to take material from cigarette butts and turn it into a carbon-based material that’s ideal for storing energy and creating a powerful supercapacitor.
Hacking has a long history in the movies, beginning with Tron and War Games and continuing through The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
9/10/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/17/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
9/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Sep 22 - 26, MCU Software Development – A Step-by-Step Guide (Using a Real Eval Board)
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: September 30 - October 2
Sponsored by Altera
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service