HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Page 1/3  >  >>
Dave Palmer
User Rank
Platinum
Re: "The modulus of rupture is zero"
Dave Palmer   1/18/2013 5:22:53 PM
NO RATINGS
@Ann: Okay, apparently you learned some highly non-standard definitions.  According to Instron's glossary of materials testing, modulus of rupture is synonymous with flexural strength.  If you Google "modulus of rupture," you'll see that this is the most commonly used definition.  Clearly, "the flexural strength is zero" would not be a correct statement.

The derivation of the most widely-used modulus of rupture formula assumes that the material deforms in a linear and elastic way, so the formula no longer applies after the yield point.  However, this doesn't mean that "the modulus of rupture is zero"; it just means that the formula no longer correctly predicts the stress.

As far as "catastrophic failure" goes, the most common definition seems to be "(sudden) failure from which recovery is impossible."

Give me any material, and I guarantee I can find a way to make it fail such that you'll never get it back into its original shape.  Hit it hard enough, and it will fail catastrophically.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Better wood than wood
Ann R. Thryft   1/18/2013 4:56:25 PM
NO RATINGS
I've also noticed that some earlier ideas and technologies are being revived,and given another chance. Some may have been inventions that were in advance of their time.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: "The modulus of rupture is zero"
Ann R. Thryft   1/18/2013 4:53:51 PM
NO RATINGS
Dave, I disagree. That's simply not the way I learned those definitions.

Dave Palmer
User Rank
Platinum
Re: "The modulus of rupture is zero"
Dave Palmer   1/18/2013 4:01:17 PM
NO RATINGS
@Ann: The fact that something bends before it breaks doesn't mean that it doesn't have a catastrophic failure mode -- it just means that it bends first.  If you continue to load it, it will fail catastrophically, sooner or later. (Steel bends before it breaks, too, but you can point to any number of catastrophic failures of steel structures).

And "the modulus of rupture is zero" is just plain wrong.  As I said, modulus of rupture is a measure of the load-carrying capacity of a beam.  If the load-carrying capacity were zero, it would be useless.

Modulus of rupture just isn't a useful number for something that yields before it breaks, since the equation assumes no yielding. 

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Better wood than wood
Ann R. Thryft   1/4/2013 2:51:28 PM
NO RATINGS
Scott, this was originally developed at Dow but never commercialized, so I suspect it was not aimed at specific applications, at least originally.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: "The modulus of rupture is zero"
Ann R. Thryft   1/4/2013 12:38:58 PM
NO RATINGS
TJ, thanks for the clarification. Determining that would probably take a detailed lifecycle analysis. Although these are now voluntary, and not nearly as common as many of us would like, I hope that someday they'll be required as an item on the data sheet.

TJ McDermott
User Rank
Blogger
Re: "The modulus of rupture is zero"
TJ McDermott   1/3/2013 9:13:23 PM
NO RATINGS
The original question was worse for the environment - structural members made from wood or the composites described in the article.

The lumber industry sells itself as renewable because the companies plant trees to replace the ones harvested, and the renewal process is pretty straight forward - Cut down a forest, make lumber, plant seedlings in the now-cleared area, come back in 20 years or so and repeat.

IF the composites are made from organic feedstocks, they may be the equal of wood's impact on the environment.  If they're made from petrochemicals, one would probably have to say they have a larger impact.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: "The modulus of rupture is zero"
Ann R. Thryft   1/3/2013 8:10:22 PM
NO RATINGS
TJ, I'm still not getting your point. Organic feedstocks are at least potentially renewable, whether they're based on trees or on other plants.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Better wood than wood
Ann R. Thryft   1/2/2013 12:05:48 PM
NO RATINGS
Lou, I thought the hurricane-resistance use was one of the most intriguing and unique about this material, aside from the more mundane uses like deck replacement. Chuck, this is not aimed at high load-bearing structural components such as bridge beams: as we state, it's for lighter construction uses such as decks and pontoons.



Scott Orlosky
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Better wood than wood
Scott Orlosky   12/30/2012 5:28:48 PM
NO RATINGS
Interesting development.  Nice to see these sort of efforts moving forward.  They may not always be the most cost effective, but it's a step in the right direction.  I wonder if this is one of those "we can do it in the lab, so let's see if we can sell it" sort of things or if they actually had a specific market in mind.

Page 1/3  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Do you long for the days of retro video gaming? Here's how you can turn an old PC into an old-school arcade cabinet with only $100 and a bit of woodwork.
A Vienna, Austria-based startup called Heliofloat has designed a platform of solar panels that can be deployed in lakes or oceans to generate solar-based electricity.
Electrical engineers from the University of Washington and Delft University of Technology have developed a new type of sensor-based platform that harvests energy from radio waves for electricity.
A simple new chemical method for repairing and recycling notoriously difficult carbon fiber composites has been developed by the Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Polymer Research. An entire component can be completely recycled, including reclaiming its expensive carbon fibers for reuse.
In today’s connected world we are seeing the beginning of connected homes, smart grids, self-driving automobiles, drones, and many other amazing devices. Out of all the soon-to-be connected devices, which device poses the greatest dangerous to its users and society?
More:Blogs|News
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
May 2 - 6, Embedded System Design Techniques™ - Rapid Prototyping Embedded Systems using Micro Python
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7 | 8 | 9


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2016 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service