@Paul: Wow! Better hope our clocks are stable. By the way, I now note that the relationship between the chip values for 8 and 9 is not unique: every single row in the table is the row above it shifted right by 2.
The Lecturer appears to have limited this lecture to a 6 year old version (year 2006) of the IEEE 802.15.4 standard. The year 2011 version (IEEE 802.15.4 - 2011) has many more modulation types and frequency bands defined in the standard. And since the year 2011 release, several more have been defined in the 802.15.4f and 802.15.4g standards.
@Paul: concerning the unique decoding of chips: I expected to see limited repeated sequences of 0s or 1s so that synchronization could be more easily maintained. In some modulation schemes bit stuffing is used to do this. However, I also expected to see unique overall sequencing of groups of 0s and 1s in the chip values for each of the data symbols. This is apparently not the case. For example, at 915MHz on slide 14, the chip values for data symbol 9 are identical to those for data symbol 8, but two bit times later (9's chip values lag those of 8 by 2 bit times). So 8 starts 01101 and 9 starts 0001101. I would think this would cause problems maintaining sync. Are there other symbols that resync the bit values that make up the chips?
@Paul: slide 15 shows 15 chip values c0 to c14 for each input bit but the text above the table says that a "16 bit chip" is in use. Is there a missing or assumed bit to make the 16th bit in the chip value?
The streaming audio player will appear on this web page when the show starts at 2pm eastern today. Note however that some companies block live audio streams. If when the show starts you don't hear any audio, try refreshing your browser.
In many engineering workplaces, there’s a generational conflict between recent engineering graduates and older, more experienced engineers. However, a recent study published in the psychology journal Cognition suggests that both may have something to learn from another group: 4 year olds.
Conventional wisdom holds that MIT, Cal Tech, and Stanford are three of the country’s best undergraduate engineering schools. Unfortunately, when conventional wisdom visits the topic of best engineering schools, it too often leaves out some of the most distinguished programs that don’t happen to offer PhD-level degrees.
Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.