HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
William K.
User Rank
Platinum
Compliance woes
William K.   12/4/2012 6:59:20 PM
NO RATINGS
My question is rather pointy, which is: what is the claimed value of having all of those records about every step pf the product design and development? Why should every design decision be placed where it can be second guessed? Most importantly, WHO will obtain the alleged value of all of this rather expensive and complicated to keep documentation? Is it being saved up as fuel for malpractice suits? Or as defense from them?

How about a truthful explanation of just why all these records are so very important.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Excellent article
Rob Spiegel   12/3/2012 9:42:49 PM
NO RATINGS
Nice to see the quote from Hunter S. Thompson, Cabe. As for regulations, the medical industry was excused from RoHS, just as the military and aerospace industries were. Have those exclusions expired?

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Excellent article
Charles Murray   12/3/2012 6:51:07 PM
NO RATINGS
About 20 years ago, Design News did a story about a new implantable defibrillator from Medtronic. For the story, Medtronic photographed one of its employees standing next to a pile of compliance documentation. The pile was a couple of feet taller than the employee, and I'm sure it has gotten much worse over the past two decades.

Cabe Atwell
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Excellent article
Cabe Atwell   12/3/2012 4:24:46 PM
NO RATINGS
Life safety give certain organizations clout to demand whatever they want. Since, they can pull that card at any moment, of course medical design companies are getting mad. Since new tech is being created every day in the industry, regulation is a must. Otherwise, we would still have x-ray machines at the shoe store. Those medical companies bought the ticket, they take the ride. (Hunter S. Thompson quote)

People are lazy, without these regulation woes we'd all get hurt.

C

Nick Ranly
User Rank
Iron
Excellent article
Nick Ranly   12/3/2012 3:45:09 PM
NO RATINGS
Great article with good information. It really is surprising how much PLM is in its infancy in this highly regulated industry.

naperlou you are correct, aerospace companies have relied on PLM for decades to reduce risk and track their development/compliance. These tools are very much needed for the medical community and hopefully companies can adopt these solutions to keep innovation moving forward.

Nick Ranly - Life Sciences

Siemens PLM Software

naperlou
User Rank
Blogger
Look to other industries
naperlou   12/3/2012 9:54:43 AM
NO RATINGS
Beth, the compliance issue is an important one.  As many engineered products are used in life critical situations, compliance is important.  It is important not just for satisfying some external authority, but for serving customers. 

That said, this applies to many industries.  Avionics is one obvious one.  The standards for various industries are generally separate and generally very similar.  Thus, PLM vendors, who typically work across industries, can bring this knowledge to bear on new areas of opportunity.  Now, if the companies would be smart and look for people with a different, but similar, compliance problem, they might find it easier to comply. 



Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Released on September 19, 2014, this 5.5 inch screen iPhone is the larger version of the iPhone 6, whose teardown follows tomorrow.
A Design News course on field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) should help engineers who are considering the technology for their upcoming designs.
In many engineering workplaces, there’s a generational conflict between recent engineering graduates and older, more experienced engineers. However, a recent study published in the psychology journal Cognition suggests that both may have something to learn from another group: 4 year olds.
CTC releases EtherCAT Master module for high-performance control of networked servos, stepping motors, and I/O devices.
Conventional wisdom holds that MIT, Cal Tech, and Stanford are three of the country’s best undergraduate engineering schools. Unfortunately, when conventional wisdom visits the topic of best engineering schools, it too often leaves out some of the most distinguished programs that don’t happen to offer PhD-level degrees.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
9/10/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/17/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
9/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Sep 22 - 26, MCU Software Development – A Step-by-Step Guide (Using a Real Eval Board)
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: September 30 - October 2
Sponsored by Altera
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service