HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
REGISTER   |   LOGIN   |   HELP
<<  <  Page 2/4  >  >>
Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Yes it is a compliance vehicle!
Charles Murray   12/4/2012 5:39:08 PM
NO RATINGS
Ratsky, check out the 1947 Fiat Topolino and the 1958 Fiat Multipla here:

http://www.designnews.com/author.asp?section_id=1366&doc_id=249222

Those two make the Fiat 500e look big.

 

NiteOwl_OvO
User Rank
Gold
Re: Yes it is a compliance vehicle!
NiteOwl_OvO   12/4/2012 4:45:35 PM
NO RATINGS
True, like most manufacturers, Fiat has managed to build some disposable cars. Perhaps Fiat more than most.;) I guess we will see how long the current lot hold up.

Cheers!

Ratsky
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Yes it is a compliance vehicle!
Ratsky   12/4/2012 4:27:39 PM
NO RATINGS
I wasn't comparing the actual cars!  Just pointing out the fact that (as another poster said just before you) Fiat doesn't exactly have an illustrious history in North America. I've owned a lot of quirky cars (including TWO different Renaults in the '50s/'60s time frame, a Dauphine and an R10)) but never a Fiat after my experience with that 500 my buddy had.  Don't forget, some of the worst cars of the Soviet era were licensed versions of Fiats (Lada, Trabant, etc.).  The whole point of most of this discussion is whether Fiat intended this car to just satisfy the CA bureaucrats that it fulfills the zero-emission mandate, or if they really expect to sell a bunch.  MY point is that if they intended the latter, they are out of touch with the marketplace, just like GM and the Volt.  Even if you just buy/license technology from your competition, it takes a huge investment to bring one of these to fruition.  As a niche vehicle instead of a mass-market one, it just doesn't make sense.

 

NiteOwl_OvO
User Rank
Gold
Re: Yes it is a compliance vehicle!
NiteOwl_OvO   12/4/2012 4:02:44 PM
NO RATINGS
Quite a few people decided to be guineapigs for the EV1. Not enough for GM to turn a profit from them, but more than enough for a learning exercise. I'm not sure why you're comparing the current Fiat 500 to the one from the '50s. It's like comparing the current Beetle to the original Type 1 with the 1100cc engine. They are very different cars. The fist generation Prius was tiny and slow compared to the later more successful cars. If I were to judge the current Prius by the original, I would say they aren't worth driving.

Cheers!

Chuck_IAG
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Status
Chuck_IAG   12/4/2012 3:32:31 PM
NO RATINGS
I knew a guy who collected Ford Edsel wrecks.  I used to be fond of Corvairs.  What does that tell you about "taste"?  Beautiful sophisticated women may not have a problem with cars that rust out in 2-3 years, like my old Fiat Spring (something like an 850cc motor as I recall) that looked cute, rather like a mini-MG, but couldn't get up a steep hill from a dead stop, and at 3 years old had a rusted-out floorboard.  But I don't let supermodels pick out my cars- they don't have to fix them.  History will, as always, judge, but Fiat does not seem to have an especially good track record in this country.

Ratsky
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Yes it is a compliance vehicle!
Ratsky   12/4/2012 2:57:07 PM
NO RATINGS
Sorry, TYPO!  It had a 16.5 HP engine, 500cc of course.  It WAS taken from a motorcycle design.

Ratsky
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Yes it is a compliance vehicle!
Ratsky   12/4/2012 2:55:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Nobody seems to get the point that if this is "a learning exercise" for Chrysler engineers, then how many potential customers will pay good money to become a guinea pig or lab rat?  I vividly remember the "second generation" Fiat 500 Nuovo from the late '50s.  A truly wretched tiny car (actually an enclosed motorcycle, 2-seater with 1.5 HP 2-cylinder air-cooled engine complete with a cable clutch).  Topped out at 59mph with a strong tailwind and a 100 lb. driver!

ChasChas
User Rank
Gold
Re: blah
ChasChas   12/4/2012 1:42:03 PM
 

Yes, the problem with Fiat is that they -  look like a Fiat.  I think their style designers have found the fountain of youth or something - they are still there after 113? years.

Chuck_IAG
User Rank
Platinum
cutting edge...
Chuck_IAG   12/4/2012 11:54:25 AM
If the Chrysler chief's statement "It's an electric vehicle that doesn't act like an electric appliance" is true, how come the controls look like those of a blender?

"retro-futuristic design"? Does a picture of George Jetson come standard, or is that an option?  Holy cow. 

My son just came from the LA auto show yesterday with camera pics of cars like a stunning new Lexus electric and the sexy BMW i8 hybrid.  And Chrysler introduces this?  I'm underwhelmed.  I've seen cuter zits on a hog.  The Fiat 500 itself looks like someone did a poor job of photoshopping the BMW Mini.  Then they brag about time in a wind tunnel...  What direction did the wind blow, I wonder?

Unless the car's price tag is going to be somewhere around free, I'll pass.  We've already got an electric skateboard.

NiteOwl_OvO
User Rank
Gold
Re: Yes it is a compliance vehicle!
NiteOwl_OvO   12/4/2012 11:45:03 AM
NO RATINGS
GT, I think you've pegged it. At least for now, the 500e appears to be a compliance car. It is also most likely a learning excercise. A necessary, but unprofitable step on the road to the future. I doubt they expect to sell more than a handful of cars. Perhaps a totally new EV design is in the works at Fiat.

<<  <  Page 2/4  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administrationís recent backup camera mandate could open the door to more vehicle innovations, including better graphical displays, 360-degree camera views, and the increased use of Ethernet.
With support from National Instruments, a group of dedicated students from Connally High School in Austin, where more than 50% of the students are at risk of not graduating, have created a successful robotics team that is competing in the FIRST World Championships.
Solar Impulse 2 -- a 100% solar-powered airplane -- has been completed. It features several advanced materials, some developed specifically for next year's attempted around-the-world flight.
Sherlock Ohms highlights stories told by engineers who have used their deductive reasoning and technical prowess to troubleshoot and solve the most perplexing engineering mysteries.
Lumus and eyeSight have partnered to create consumer-grade devices that offer all the prime functions of smart glasses without the bulk.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
3/27/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York / 7:00 p.m. London
2/27/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York / 7:00 p.m. London
12/18/2013 Available On Demand
11/20/2013 Available On Demand
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Apr 21 - 25, Creating & Testing Your First RTOS Application Using MQX
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: April 29 - Day 1
Sponsored by maxon precision motors
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service