I've been on three sides of this issue for most of my career. Industry, Teaching (Technical), and Volunteering in the public school system. From my point of view, the problem of getting industry people into schools with their valuable experience is a fault that lies in misunderstanding on each of the three sides. But a key way to improve this problem lies in having a school leader who can take (or assign) the role of a volunteer coordinator. Teachers and to some extent administrators already have a lot on their plate, and often don't fully understand themselves how a system can work. Industry often doesn't understand the environment well enough know how and where their resources can be used, and volunteers and teachers need to develop a working trust relationship before students are "turned over". Again, long story short, a person serving the role of volunteer coordinator can build the methodology to mesh these three entities together. I guess the hurdle becomes, how to get the importance of this kind of position into the minds of all parties involved. Hmm... seems like I just wrote myself a job description!
Amen to that, mrdon – bootstrapping is good word, and engineers love to do things themselves. I recently saw a list published (wish I could recall it for posting, but can't remember ... ) a listing of people considered "Most Trusted". At the top of the list were Nurses, Doctors, and Engineers; and while Car Salesmen were dead last, Congressmen were 2nd to last. Yet somehow, Gov't & congressional mandates still rule so many of our daily activities – as if they know best.
In a bid to boost the viability of lithium-based electric car batteries, a team at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory has developed a chemistry that could possibly double an EV’s driving range while cutting its battery cost in half.
Using Siemens NX software, a team of engineering students from the University of Michigan built an electric vehicle and raced in the 2013 Bridgestone World Solar Challenge. One of those students blogged for Design News throughout the race.
Robots that walk have come a long way from simple barebones walking machines or pairs of legs without an upper body and head. Much of the research these days focuses on making more humanoid robots. But they are not all created equal.
For industrial control applications, or even a simple assembly line, that machine can go almost 24/7 without a break. But what happens when the task is a little more complex? That’s where the “smart” machine would come in. The smart machine is one that has some simple (or complex in some cases) processing capability to be able to adapt to changing conditions. Such machines are suited for a host of applications, including automotive, aerospace, defense, medical, computers and electronics, telecommunications, consumer goods, and so on. This discussion will examine what’s possible with smart machines, and what tradeoffs need to be made to implement such a solution.