HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
William K.
User Rank
Platinum
Sensor selection criteria
William K.   12/21/2012 8:39:07 PM
NO RATINGS
When I was designing industrial tsting and calibration systems the two main criteria were stability and ruggedness. Because of the types of testing the machines did, the readings only needed to be accurate at the points of interest, often at a single point. So the transducer had to hold calibration for that particular pressure point, and be veryy stable. Calibrations were normally done quarterly, at least that was the target, and by selecting the right sensors we would normally only need a very small correction on a yearly basis. So it was far cheaper to spend more on a stable transducer that wound up only needing to be checked on a yearly basis. That stability won my argument for purchasing the more expensive device. Mechanical durability and freedom from mechanical aging, (diaphram work hardening), and electronic stability, wound up being the two primary parameters in our selection process, because that was what mattered to our customers.

The customer may not always be right, but they are always the ones with the money.

ajdashsmith
User Rank
Iron
Re: Ruggedized sensors
ajdashsmith   11/30/2012 10:44:07 AM
NO RATINGS
For the most extreme situation I think that is the case, but for markets and applications that are large enough, they drive standard solutions even if those are ruggedized solutions.  One other thing that has become important is that to have the flexibility and scale to create a particular solution, it is much more efficient to have a standard product platform that the sensor supplier then takes and implements a ruggedized solution on top of the standard product.  Much faster and more efficient than developing the entire sensor from scratch.  This is how we have positioned our standard product platforms at Honeywell to address individual customer needs for ruggedized sensors.
- AJ Smith

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Ruggedized sensors
Rob Spiegel   11/30/2012 10:08:49 AM
NO RATINGS
AJ, that makes sense. I would guess that the days of using off-the-shelf components are gone for many of these devices.

ajdashsmith
User Rank
Iron
Re: Ruggedized sensors
ajdashsmith   11/30/2012 8:22:56 AM
NO RATINGS
That can be the case, Rob, and increases as the sensor becomes more specialized.  When it comes to doing something completely custom there are often times development agreements and engineering costs involved beyond just the cost of the sensor as well.
 - AJ Smith

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Ruggedized sensors
Rob Spiegel   11/29/2012 11:22:07 PM
NO RATINGS
AJ, I would imagine the ruggedized sensors would come with some significant cost consequences. 

ajdashsmith
User Rank
Iron
Re: Ruggedized sensors
ajdashsmith   11/28/2012 11:03:21 PM
NO RATINGS
Rob, What I see is that environmental resilience is much like other performance factors in that the more stringent the requirement (in this case the more extreme the environmental factor(s) the fewer options there are to choose from. And in some cases for really extreme environments the design engineer may need to work with a supplier to develop a product that can meet their particular requirements.
- AJ Smith

Nancy Golden
User Rank
Platinum
Good General Principles
Nancy Golden   11/28/2012 4:00:46 PM
NO RATINGS
Nice article A.J. - I appreciated your very straightforward explanation of pressure sensor selection. I can also see how your criteria can be easily adapted to selecting any sensor by using your general principles coupled with sensor specific criteria. It's so important for the design engineer to understand all of the variables involved when making a selection!

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Ruggedized sensors
Rob Spiegel   11/28/2012 2:01:24 PM
NO RATINGS
AJ, On your last point about finding sensors that can function in difficult environment, do design engineers have sufficient choices that can work under environmental stress?



Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
A team from MIT's Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab (CSAIL) has developed a breakthrough new multi-material 3D printer.
The trend to automation development software emphasizing configurable objects, versus structured programming, takes a step forward.
Everyone working in MEMS is chasing the ever-elusive golden wafer. But there is a moral to this story, and help is on the way.
Despite pervasive emphasis on “faster, sooner, better,” companies that have multiple design cycles a year only update their approved vendor lists on an annual basis. Maybe it's time to rethink this.
Taking energy from renewable sources, recycling existing energy, and using components that don’t need much energy at all are becoming critical industrial and consumer design criteria.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
8/13/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
6/25/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
6/24/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
6/11/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Aug 31 - Sep4, Embedded System Design Techniques™ - Writing Portable and Robust Firmware in C
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service