As they said, It is "difficult to explore all possibilities." Since failures come from the unpredictable, I wonder how well failure analysis software holds up to real world tests. Testing the capabilities of materials and systems is one thing, but a sudden lightening strike is another. Does anyone else thing that failure analysis should be more thorough? There is an infinite number of possibilities, but in most cases it comes down to small collection of normal and obscure.
Festo's BionicKangaroo combines pneumatic and electrical drive technology, plus very precise controls and condition monitoring. Like a real kangaroo, the BionicKangaroo robot harvests the kinetic energy of each takeoff and immediately uses it to power the next jump.
Design News and Digi-Key presents: Creating & Testing Your First RTOS Application Using MQX, a crash course that will look at defining a project, selecting a target processor, blocking code, defining tasks, completing code, and debugging.
Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.