HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
REGISTER   |   LOGIN   |   HELP
<<  <  Page 6/7  >  >>
bdcst
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Voice activated, hands free
bdcst   11/8/2012 2:02:30 PM
NO RATINGS
I use voice recognition Blue Tooth linked speakerphones in my vehicles to provide full control of my cell phone which can remain in my pocket.  And I've always had 2-way radios which require the use of a hand held microphone with a push to talk switch.  In both instances  with a little practice, one can minimize the degree of distraction by cultivating good multi-tasking habits.  Problem is, you do have to practice to hone those skills.  And recent studies have shown that even a hands free cellular conversation is a distraction from the primary task of driving.  The more we multi-task, the less cognitive power is available for each task.

So, the best way to compensate for a reduction in road environment/vehicle control awareness is to add technology that will raise safety margins by adding some self piloting capability to the vehicle itself.

JimRW
User Rank
Silver
Re: technology needed
JimRW   11/8/2012 12:43:04 PM
NO RATINGS
I have to disagree with you about haptic feed back being useful here for secondary controls. Haptics in touch screens inform the user they touched the screen, but you still have to look at it to see what specific spot was touched because a touch screen feels the same all over.

My opinion: Secondary controls (audio and climate, lights, etc.) should not require fine muscle control to operate and should be identifiable in peripheral vision and by touch. Neither is possible with a touch screen. Touch screens should be left to control only those things that are normally set and left alone.

I can see modifying my opinion regarding voice control, but I've not had experience with it yet.

tekochip
User Rank
Platinum
Coffee Icon
tekochip   11/8/2012 11:33:59 AM
NO RATINGS
The coffee icon made me laugh.  Can you imagine if somebody borrows your car and they don't know what the coffee icon is supposed to mean?  They might start checking the cup holder for a fresh brew.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Voice activated, hands free
Rob Spiegel   11/8/2012 11:13:50 AM
NO RATINGS
Yes, Chuck, I was so impressed by the hands-free voice recognition, it makes me wonder why so much effort is being put into the systems in your slide show. Although, the systems in your slide show are pretty cool to see.

NadineJ
User Rank
Platinum
Re: solutions?
NadineJ   11/8/2012 10:50:30 AM
NO RATINGS
Make cars less safe?  Hilarious!!  I'm lucky enough to be in Generation-X and remember cars that didn't have seatbelts but love the new technology too.  One of my best memories growing up is playing with dolls in the back of my mom's Pinto.  The big window was awesome! 

I don't know if kids today are missing out on the fun but there has to be an in between.  Technology needs a balance of personal responsibility on the users part in order to progress.

John
User Rank
Gold
GPS/Navigator using HUD and existing stereo system
John   11/8/2012 9:53:03 AM
NO RATINGS
Back when rally racing was aired in the USA, I thought it fascinating that rally racers have navigators that could reference a map if need and tell the driver exactly what is coming up while traveling around 100mph on a usually unpaved road.  I think a system like this is a better answer than proximity switches and voice recognition devices.  The driver has the option of muting the audio, but it comes back on as soon as a button on the dash is pressed unless the stereo is on and it would tell the driver straight-away and turn information using GPS and the car has a device that can notify the driver of objects around the car and notify the driver of there speed and distance from them.  All this could use road sign style symbols on the HUD and the stereo speaker system to notify the driver.

ugh
User Rank
Iron
Re: solutions?
ugh   11/8/2012 9:51:02 AM
NO RATINGS
All these solutions are still part of the problem: visual distraction. The system should be voice recognition with audio response. Then your eyes are always on the road where they belong.

ChasChas
User Rank
Gold
Re: technology needed
ChasChas   11/8/2012 9:43:33 AM
NO RATINGS
 

Yes, naperlou. We need to borrow from aircraft. The single seat fighter pilot is the most distracted driver in the world and flys in formation yet!

HUD is a mainstay for them - and training. And those who cannot do it, do not fly. Why should it be any different for driving? Every driver must be trained to know their limits and abide by them.

VadimR
User Rank
Gold
Re: solutions?
VadimR   11/8/2012 9:41:58 AM
NO RATINGS
Couldn't agree more with you.  My car doesn't have a radio and I completely agree.  Same when I ride my bike (either motorcycle or bicycle).


The other alternative I have is a bit unorthodox, but it would work; make the cars less safe!  If you take out the safety devices from the car, people will think twice about being distracted because there is no cushion of safety.  Too many people that I know are very flippant about driving because they are not worried of getting into an accident because chances are good that they will not get hurt in an accident and that insurance will pay for a new car.  So the consequences are very minimal for bad driving.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Voice activated, hands free
Charles Murray   11/7/2012 6:20:42 PM
NO RATINGS
Advances in voice recognition are amazing, Rob. Ten years ago, VR systems only understood a few words from a very small menu. Now, they can run radios, entertainment systems, HVAC systems and mobile phones. They've come a long way.

<<  <  Page 6/7  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Festo's BionicKangaroo combines pneumatic and electrical drive technology, plus very precise controls and condition monitoring. Like a real kangaroo, the BionicKangaroo robot harvests the kinetic energy of each takeoff and immediately uses it to power the next jump.
Practicing engineers have not heeded Yoda's words.
Design News and Digi-Key presents: Creating & Testing Your First RTOS Application Using MQX, a crash course that will look at defining a project, selecting a target processor, blocking code, defining tasks, completing code, and debugging.
Rockwell Automation recently unveiled a new safety relay that can be configured and integrated through existing software to program safety logic in devices.
These are the toys that inspired budding engineers to try out sublime designs, create miniature structures, and experiment with bizarre contraptions using sets that could be torn down and reconstructed over and over.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
3/27/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York / 7:00 p.m. London
2/27/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York / 7:00 p.m. London
12/18/2013 Available On Demand
11/20/2013 Available On Demand
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Apr 21 - 25, Creating & Testing Your First RTOS Application Using MQX
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: April 29 - Day 1
Sponsored by maxon precision motors
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service