<<  <  Page 7/7
Charles Murray
User Rank
Re: technology needed
Charles Murray   11/7/2012 6:18:00 PM
They say HUD cuts the time required to shift your eyesight from the road to the instrument panel by about 0.4 seconds, naperlou. If you're going 60 mph, that translates to about 35 feet. So, yes, I agree, HUD has value.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Re: solutions?
Ann R. Thryft   11/7/2012 4:45:53 PM
The "innovation" in the first slide has been around for a couple of decades, at least in the stick-on version. I'm surprised it's taken so long to integrate these blind spot mirrors into the side-view mirrors.

User Rank
Re: solutions?
JamesCAnder   11/7/2012 3:49:42 PM
It's obvious, driverless cars is the only way to go. To truly remove the issues with distracted drivers, we must remove the drivers.

But in the meantime, I am liking the head-up display and voice recognition options. The only free HMI in voice in these cases. However, an intuitive interface is needed first. Otherwise, it's just another device to learn all the shortcuts on.


Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Re: solutions?
Ann R. Thryft   11/7/2012 2:41:33 PM
I've got to agree with Nadine about distractions for drivers. It was a lot easier to focus on the road, the other drivers and various external moving objects like kids and dogs--or deer and pedestrians where I live--before all those beeping and flashing devices inhabited the car's interior. I basically don't have any in my car for that reason.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Voice activated, hands free
Rob Spiegel   11/7/2012 1:39:23 PM
Great slideshow, Chuck. I recently rode with my daughter's boyfriend to see my daughter's dance recital. He was driving a 2011 truck (can't remember what make). His entertainment system was run entirely by voice. He could announce a radio station or call for a specific song from a specific band from his digital music collection. He could also make a phone call initiated by voice. At all times he had both hands on the wheel and his eyes on the road. Very impressive, very safe.

User Rank
technology needed
naperlou   11/7/2012 12:16:33 PM
Chuck, if we are going to allow all these personal devices to be used in cars then the only real solution will lie with technologies, including those you have in the slide show.  Two of the most promising to me are haptics and HUD.  The layout of insgtruments in cars is not very optimal.  A study of aircraft and race cars may be useful in this regard.

User Rank
NadineJ   11/7/2012 10:40:37 AM
Many of the solutions are very distracting themsleves.  HUDs are very cool but the driver is still looking at the display, not the car in front.  It's likely that an accident will be mitigated but not avoided altogether. 

Anecdotally, I spent yesterday media free--as I do during every majour election.  No radio, no tv, etc.  It was the best driving experience I've had in a long time.  Instead of being isolated in my media box and separated from everyone around me, I paid attention.  No near misses.  I was never cut off.  And, I avoided traffic jams and hazards like a ninja.

Paying attention is the best solution.  It's interesting how we use technology to solve the problems that our mis-use of technology creates.  Ford's approach (Driving Skills for Life) is definitely a good model.

<<  <  Page 7/7

Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Eric Chesak created a sensor that can detect clouds, and it can also measure different sources of radiation.
Festo's BionicKangaroo combines pneumatic and electrical drive technology, plus very precise controls and condition monitoring. Like a real kangaroo, the BionicKangaroo robot harvests the kinetic energy of each takeoff and immediately uses it to power the next jump.
Practicing engineers have not heeded Yoda's words.
Design News and Digi-Key presents: Creating & Testing Your First RTOS Application Using MQX, a crash course that will look at defining a project, selecting a target processor, blocking code, defining tasks, completing code, and debugging.
Rockwell Automation recently unveiled a new safety relay that can be configured and integrated through existing software to program safety logic in devices.
Design News Webinar Series
3/27/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York / 7:00 p.m. London
2/27/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York / 7:00 p.m. London
12/18/2013 Available On Demand
11/20/2013 Available On Demand
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Apr 21 - 25, Creating & Testing Your First RTOS Application Using MQX
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: April 29 - Day 1
Sponsored by maxon precision motors
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service