akwaman, Nicely explained, I agree totally with all the points you've made. I wanted to use SSRs(solid state relays) in wireless Hunter Fan Ceiling Controls but management was against it because of cost. As you discussed in your post, yes the intial cost investment is somewhat pricey but the ROI would have been substantial in terms of reduced customer warranty claims due to failing electromechanical relays. I'm definitely will be sharing this article with my Control Systems class at ITT Tech.
I couldn't agree with you more, naperlou. Solid state is the way to go whenever is makes sense, as far as I'm concerned. In noise sensitive data aquisition matters, electromechanical relays can introduce unwanted noise into a system. These kinds of optical relay technology has many uses. Of course the obious power savings is a plus as is the reliability factor.
Whenever a solid state component is available it will generally be superior to an electromechanical one in most modern applications. I ran into this years ago with amplifiers for communications for satellites. Typically klystron tubes were used. Advances in solid state amplifiers allowed the replacement of these in many cases. They were more reliable, lighter and used less power. I see the same thing with this class of relay. They also, as is pointed out, avoid some of the pitfalls of electromechanical relays. There was an article in Design News about a problem with such a relay recently.
Engineers at Fuel Cell Energy have found a way to take advantage of a side reaction, unique to their carbonate fuel cell that has nothing to do with energy production, as a potential, cost-effective solution to capturing carbon from fossil fuel power plants.
To get to a trillion sensors in the IoT that we all look forward to, there are many challenges to commercialization that still remain, including interoperability, the lack of standards, and the issue of security, to name a few.
This is part one of an article discussing the University of Washington’s nationally ranked FSAE electric car (eCar) and combustible car (cCar). Stay tuned for part two, tomorrow, which will discuss the four unique PCBs used in both the eCar and cCars.
Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.