I suppose that the judge would need to temper their remarks a bit. Sometimes I do ask " Are you stoned? or just Stupid", when dealing with some folks. Mostly that question gets rid of people who are quite unpleasent, and possibly dangerous, to have nearby. A recent example , while at a campground on a holiday weekend, was seeing someone attepting to ignite 4 inch diameter logs in a firepit by pouring gasoline on them and lighting it. That does not often work on green wood or on wet wood, and almost never works on wet green wood.
As fro fuse sizing, and fuse abuse, some of us understand quite well when we can get away with a 20 amp fuse instead of a ten amp fuse, while many don't. The frustration comes in attempting to use equipment designed to protect the very most unthinking fools from all injuries, which certainly prevents the rest of us from using it in any innovative manner.
William K, I'm sure you're happy to hear that you'd make a bad lawyer. You're thinking too sensibly.
I agree with you, and I bet most readers do too. That doesn't change the fact that improper fuse use happens, doesn't change the fact that product misuse happens all the time. As the link I gave stated, a screwdriver used to open a paint can is a misuse of the tool which should be expected.
The woman who initially won her civil suit against McDonalds for their too-hot coffee should have been sensible enough to expect a burn with hot liquid near her lap. A jury disagreed and gave her a substantial award for her utter stupidity.
Luckily, an appeals judge had more sense and drastically slashed the award.
What you said is what SHOULD happen, but is not what DOES happen.
Just once, I'd like to see a news story about a judge who told the plaintiff "Are you a complete idiot? Are you unable to pour water from a boot even when the instructions are printed on the heel? Case dismissed for utter lack of common sense".
At some point the owners of equipment must assume responsibility for not behaving in a stupid manner! This is particularly applicable to fuses, and the replacement of fuses. When we mark a fuse holder with a particular fuse type and rating that is what should be used as a replacement. It is the users responsibility to install the correct fuse type and size. An individual who does not understand that is fundaamentally unqualified to do the job. It is that simple. Unfortunately the courts are choosing to reward stupidity at the expense of the rest of us.
I agree wholeheartedly with your statement, "That environment is ripe for misusing a same-sized but differently rated fuse." Maintenance personnel are also not necessarily conversant with subtle nuances like time-delay versus fast blowing fuses...I had a friend that used to work on control boxes for door openers and I would shudder to see what he would pull out of a fuse holder in place of the correct fuse - tin foil, screws and pennies were popular choices.
The nature of electronics demands that folks may need to substitute parts but to do so without proper cross-referencing them is to me, very shabby work. Unforeseen problems may or may not develop with parts that are not OEM or are comparable but specs aren't exactly the same and these problems are hard to predict.
While I see your concern and the reality is, people will often make assumptions without further verification, I think having the responsibility of replacing a part should require the person doing it to make sure the part is adequate for the task. So if we are speaking about the ideal - the fuses would always be verified. But companies have to deal with reality. A smart manager would make sure there is a ready supply of the correct fuses available!
I perfer ciruit breakers in the applications I'm involved. And the same or similar information applies.
Some of my motorcycle ciruits were over loaded. The solder holding the fuse element melted but the element and fuse was still "good".
We had a coffee vender that had a problem with a 50 amp CB kicking out. Well it was very hot inside the coffe shack and the thermal CB was only working as design. You have to get the heat out of the environment not replace the CB.
We were challenged for 60 Hz ciruit protection for a flying test bed that used much GPTE intended for ground use. The only manufacturer Cultler - Hammer with some slight derating. Typical 400 Hz CBs do not open wide enought to quelch the 60 Hz arc.
One alternative is to use a resettable polymer PTC (PolySwitch Device) instead of a fuse. That way, after the fault condition is cleared and the power is removed, it will reset itself to the low resistance condition, and the sytsem will work again. This eliminates the possibility of someone useing the wrong fuse. I should point out that these devices are not designed for large power systems, but in lower votlage applicatoins and circuit board level applications, they are very useful.
I agree with all that you say, Naperlou, but I also believe that short-sighted management decisions lead to litigation for assigning blame when something goes wrong.
I've watched the quality of maintenance departments decline over the years - pick your reason why: lower pay offered, staff cuts leading to overwork, running equipment longer without commesurate maintenance. All reasons point to maximizing profit.
When a manufacturer names three similar but functionally very different items with very similar part numbers, ANYONE can make a mistake.
The varying character should either be first, or last, plain and simple.
I've seen a number of maintenance departments run on a shoe-string budget (penny-wise, pound foolish) and am amazed at what the technicians can do with almost nothing. That environment is ripe for misusing a same-sized but differently rated fuse.
In a bid to boost the viability of lithium-based electric car batteries, a team at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory has developed a chemistry that could possibly double an EV’s driving range while cutting its battery cost in half.
Using Siemens NX software, a team of engineering students from the University of Michigan built an electric vehicle and raced in the 2013 Bridgestone World Solar Challenge. One of those students blogged for Design News throughout the race.
Robots that walk have come a long way from simple barebones walking machines or pairs of legs without an upper body and head. Much of the research these days focuses on making more humanoid robots. But they are not all created equal.
For industrial control applications, or even a simple assembly line, that machine can go almost 24/7 without a break. But what happens when the task is a little more complex? That’s where the “smart” machine would come in. The smart machine is one that has some simple (or complex in some cases) processing capability to be able to adapt to changing conditions. Such machines are suited for a host of applications, including automotive, aerospace, defense, medical, computers and electronics, telecommunications, consumer goods, and so on. This discussion will examine what’s possible with smart machines, and what tradeoffs need to be made to implement such a solution.