HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
<<  <  Page 3/3
Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Volt battery pack cost?
Rob Spiegel   9/11/2012 8:40:31 AM
NO RATINGS
I agree, Dennis. This doesn't look promising unless that are some technical breakthroughs to lower the cost of building the Volt. It doesn't look like high-volume consumer purchasing is going to save the day.

Bunter
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Volt battery pack cost?
Bunter   9/10/2012 3:46:03 PM
NO RATINGS
I suspect that the $40k retail price was chosen as the price they could eventually reach if development and volume go as per plan.  Considering that the public has been reticent with $7500 off that number I think this will be a problem.

Regards,

Dennis

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Volt battery pack cost?
Rob Spiegel   9/10/2012 3:29:57 PM
NO RATINGS
That statistic that Volt is losing $49K per car is quite shocking, Dennis. Obviously, that can't be sustained no matter how high government subsidies may be. 

Here's the article:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/10/us-generalmotors-autos-volt-idUSBRE88904J20120910

$89,000 to build each Volt. Yikes.

GlennA
User Rank
Gold
a hybrid Hybrid ?
GlennA   9/10/2012 2:40:45 PM
NO RATINGS
Mixing battery technologies seems to have the potential to reduce costs without hurting overall performance.  Aren't marine deep-cycle batteries lead-acid ?  The lead-acid seems like the answer to acceleration, while the lithium-ion is there for range.

Bunter
User Rank
Platinum
Volt battery pack cost?
Bunter   9/10/2012 12:54:47 PM
NO RATINGS
Considering the announcement today that the Volt is losing $49K per car I have to wonder if the $12k for a battery pack is any closer to reality than the $40k retail price.

Just a thought.

Dennis

naperlou
User Rank
Blogger
Tackling the real problem
naperlou   9/10/2012 11:21:07 AM
NO RATINGS
Now this is a good engineering story.  As we have debated hybrids and EVs, the issue has always been cost.  The answer to the battery issue has always been lithium ion.  This is not a technology I would embrace because of the cost.  

By approaching the problem of cost rather than starting with a technology to apply, the EPS is solving the problem.  I also like the hybrid lead acid and lithium ion idea.  It is similar to a concept used in disk drives where a small solid state device is paired with a spinning drive to provide both speed and large storage at a lower cost. 

tekochip
User Rank
Platinum
It's new again?
tekochip   9/10/2012 8:14:37 AM
NO RATINGS
I never thought I would hear about lead-acid batteries again.  Traditionally, the chemistry isn't very finicky, but the cycle life is poor and the energy density is terrible.  One bright spot in the chemistry is that the cells are easily recycled, with something like 97% of depleted cells being recycled.


<<  <  Page 3/3


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
We shared our list, now Design News readers tell us which artificial intelligence movies they watch again and again.
Researchers have been working on a number of alternative chemistries to lithium-ion for next-gen batteries, silicon-air among them. However, while the technology has been viewed as promising and cost-effective, to date researchers haven’t managed to develop a battery of this chemistry with a viable running time -- until now.
Norway-based additive manufacturing company Norsk Titanium is building what it says is the first industrial-scale 3D printing plant in the world for making aerospace-grade metal components. The New York state plant will produce 400 metric tons each year of aerospace-grade, structural titanium parts.
Researchers have simplified the fabrication of the geometric requirements for fluid motion in microrobots for in vivo medical applications.
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s recently announced plan to put an electric airplane in the air by 2018 is forward-looking, but hardly unique.
More:Blogs|News
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Jul 11 - 15, Embedded System Design Techniques™ - Debugging Real-time Embedded Software – Hands on
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7 | 8 | 9 | 10


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2016 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service