<<  <  Page 2/8  >  >>
User Rank
Re: Motor for more mileage
pkoning   8/24/2012 9:15:18 AM
Motor in wheel is certainly an interesting idea (and an obvious one; it's been done before).

The statement "30 percent farther than other mass-produced EVs" is clearly not true.  A cynic might say there isn't any such thing as a mass-produced EV, but if you assume that this means "not a concept car" and "not a limited production hand-built car" (like the Tesla Roadster) but rather something built in to a factory with the hope that it would sell in the thousands (like the Leaf) then clearly the Tesla model S qualifies, and that has a range around 300 miles.

User Rank
What about....the electronics?
didymus7   8/24/2012 9:23:51 AM
Was this article about the car or about Dupont plastics?  I find it hard to believe that we got nothing about the battery or electronics on this car.  So many new technologies and all we get is plastics talk.

User Rank
Web site observations.
Bunter   8/24/2012 9:29:35 AM
Hmmm...looking at the website I'm getting the impression this is still pretty conceptual.  The claimed weight on their pdf was 1580 kg (3483 lb), OK but not amazing and production vehicles rarely seem to make their projected weight.

With EVs I'm taking the stance that I'll believe their mileage claims when several independant testers confirm it and I'll believe their "price" when they can operate profitably at that number without external support.

Best of luck to them, but I'm not getting excited just yet.


User Rank
Re: Novel design approach
ChasChas   8/24/2012 9:33:21 AM

Yes, there is the unsprung weight issue, but what about traction control?

True traction control is impossible with only a quarter of the power available for each wheel. No good for an AWD type vehicle meant for snow, slush and mud.

User Rank
How durable???
kf2qd   8/24/2012 9:40:56 AM
I wonder how durable this system would be. Motors in the wheel where the magnets would also be exposed to all the road shock. I ahve worked with motors where the magnets came loose that were solid mounted with no shock to the motor. Also the cables, the iregular vibration that they would be exposed to going from the frame to the wheel would have to be considerred a harsh environment.

I would favor a mid mounted motor driving 2 wheels through more conventional half shafts. Fewer motors with the motors temselves being isolated from vibration and shock. Also would require few, albeit larger, motor controllers. From experience - the more complex the system, the more likeley it is to fail. More controllers, the more places to fail and the more likelyhood of a failure...

My opinion is that many of the current designs are made t do well in the JDPowers 1 year owner survey, but I would like to know how these designs will do in 5 and 10 years. For $32,000,00 US this car has to last a while to be able to justify the expenditure for all but the wealthy. Byut then, when folks will commit themselve to a $300,000+ house that they can't pay for I guess a $32,000 car they can't pay for seems like peanuts.

Ivan Kirkpatrick
User Rank
Time will show....
Ivan Kirkpatrick   8/24/2012 9:52:03 AM
I think time will show that the idea of wheel motors is pretty compelling.  Given the ability to control the torque at each wheel will improve handling.  It is a tradeoff with the increased unsprung weight but eventually the wheel motors will be much lighter.

The design benefits should not be overlooked in terms of reducing the amount of space taken up by the motor, transmission and other drivetrain components.  Moving all this outboard to the wheel provides more room in the chassis for batteries.

The use of plastics is very significant in that reducing weight of the vehicle is the only first order variable in miles per gallon or in this case range of the vehicle.

I 'm looking for a small two seat commuter car much like this one.  I drive less than 75 miles per day on my daily commute and can park the car in the garage and connect it to a 240 volt charger for an overnight charge.  Five days a week, 50 weeks a year.  My big crew cab pickup with a V8 getting 17 miles per gallon will be relegated to weekend duties around town and long distance trips. I figure the savings in gas expenditures will pay for a good piece of the new car payments.

Rich Casebolt
User Rank
Re: Novel design approach
Rich Casebolt   8/24/2012 9:55:37 AM
The other potential issue, is synchronized control of the four motors ... if a failure occurs and one motor loses power, what does that do to control and handling (and tire wear).  I would think that the AWD traction control systems would face similar problems, so perhaps this problem has been approached there - except that in those systems, you can default back to standard 2WD operation, which I see as less of a problem than inducing a sudden imbalance between the four drive wheels.

User Rank
If it seems too good to be true...
Contrarian   8/24/2012 10:02:19 AM
the SIM-WIL has four motors -- one in the hub of each wheel. Each delivers 65kW of power, giving the car a total output of 260kW

Wow, a compact car with 350 HP on tap?  Those are some serious wheel motors.

The holy grail has always been to put the motor in the wheel but physics keeps getting in the way- coming up with a low mass, high power and high efficiency design is not simple nor inexpensive.

These claims of range and power at this price point do not pass the common sense test.  I'll believe it when I see it, otherwise it's just vaporware.



User Rank
Re: Novel design approach
kufman   8/24/2012 10:17:35 AM
With the amount of power they have at each wheel, it should work just fine as an AWD.  After all, they have almost a Prius at each wheel!  This could be a better than any other version of traction control because each wheel can be controlled independantly.  Not something that you can do with 1 power plant and brakes.

I don't think unsprung weight will be much of an issue either.  This is a commuter car not an entry into a F1 race.  

User Rank
Controls and Unsprung Weight
DanielJoseph   8/24/2012 10:19:34 AM
I am glad to see companies attempting new ideas.   This idea isn't exactly new, (http://www.treehugger.com/cars/electric-mini-0-60-in-4-seconds-it-has-motors-in-its-wheels.html) but who really cares unless there is IP involved.  I hope their efforts bear fruit for others to take it further.  The tough parts to this solution will be the control software (traction control, stability control, failure modes) and managing the effects to the passenger's ride experience from the extra unsprung weight in the wheels.  I'm not a tire expert, but I bet it will take special small tires to handle the extra stresses as they will undoubtedly rely on the tires to absorb some of the energy from bumps.


<<  <  Page 2/8  >  >>

Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
US factory orders for durable goods tumbled 3.4% in December on a big drop in new bookings for commercial aircraft, according to data the Commerce Department released Tuesday.
FPGAs are the glue logic in today's systems, but what they glue together are a variety of diverse sub-systems with different interface requirements.
Enterprising Tesla Model S owner Steve Sasman seems to have figured out a way of recouping some of the cost on his car by renting the trunk out on AirBnB, the room/house rental website.
Everyone has had the experience of trying to scrape the last of the peanut butter or mayonnaise from the bottom of a glass jar without getting your hand sticky. Inventor Ron Jidmar thinks he has a solution to all of that nonsense with a flexible jar design that can be squeezed with one hand to lift contents from the bottom to the top of a jar or container, leaving the other hand free to scoop the contents out cleanly.
Made by Monkeys highlights products that somehow slipped by the QC cops.
Design News Webinar Series
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
12/10/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
11/19/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
2/25/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Jan 26 - 30, IPv6 for Micros – Hands-On
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  67

Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Last Archived Class
Sponsored by Stratasys
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service