HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Comments
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
apresher
User Rank
Blogger
Applications
apresher   8/14/2012 9:00:10 AM
NO RATINGS
Chuck,  While packaging automation is a big market for this type of capability, integration of robotic arms into machines is a phenomena that reaches into all types of applications.  Especially with the development of technology to create "programmable safety zones", it's now possible for robotics to become more tightly integrated with the machine process.  That reduces floor space requirements and enables automation engineers to design around robotic arms to eliminate some custom design.  Now with the ability to program the line controls for the machine, plus robotic motions, using the same programming environment on a single machine controller, it's creating more incentive to move machine designs in this direction.

apresher
User Rank
Blogger
Robotics Programming
apresher   8/14/2012 8:53:20 AM
NO RATINGS
TJ, The most common and popular software approach for these type of systems is based on the IEC61131-3 programming languages, with solutions provided by a wide range of automation vendors.  These automation software packages are already wide in used for general machine control, so robotic kinematics is another group of software objects/libraries that can be integrated into the package.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Other industries?
Charles Murray   8/13/2012 10:12:12 PM
NO RATINGS
Very nicely reported, Al. Can we anticate this technology's use in any other industries outside packaging? Automotive assembly maybe?

TJ McDermott
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Single Point Failure
TJ McDermott   8/13/2012 1:28:17 PM
NO RATINGS
naperlou, for vision I'd agree with you.  I've not seen a PAC that tightly integrated vision the way motion has been.

Eventually, it will be; I can see the benefits of merging the two for even better robotics.  I haven't seen any of the big automation companies offer a camera yet.

Centralized control does make sense (assuming redundancy is covered properly) when there are numerous devices with similar control requirements.  Central control means a single point to adjust programming, and a central point from which supervisory and HMI systems can collect data.

Distributed controls means touching each and every machine to roll out a change (connect, download, verify, disconnect, again and again).  It also means a much more complex task for collecting data.  In some cases, the number of connections becomes a limiting factor.

TJ McDermott
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Single Point Failure
TJ McDermott   8/13/2012 1:23:06 PM
NO RATINGS
ttemple, we use a lot of Rockwell Automation hardware and software (Logix5000).

I've also used AML from Pacific Scientific (a long time ago).  Both are an integrated programming environment, and I find I like that, a LOT.

Having to have different suites of software for different parts of a large system can get cumbersome, FAST, especially when the software does not play nice with other packages (Rockwell and Siemens are notorious for this).

Running different suites in their own Virtual Machines is how we handle that problem, but again, it's much nicer to have a single programming environment.

naperlou
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Single Point Failure
naperlou   8/13/2012 1:14:03 PM
NO RATINGS
Frankly, I agree with TJ.  This becomes a single point of failure.  I also am more inclined, in design projects I am involved in, to push the intellgence out to where it is used.  There are lots of processors that have specilaized instructions that will handle the computational load at a much lower power level.  Vision systems, for example, are tending toward smart cameras.  This allows most, of not all, of the processing to be done at the camera, thereby reducing the traffic on the communications link.

The main issue that seems to be addressed here is the comminications latency.  There are standard busses that handle this with predictability and high speed. 

ttemple
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Single Point Failure
ttemple   8/13/2012 1:01:42 PM
NO RATINGS
TJ,

What programming language(s) are used in the system(s)?

 

TJ McDermott
User Rank
Blogger
Single Point Failure
TJ McDermott   8/13/2012 12:20:56 PM
NO RATINGS
My company makes control systems using a central PAC for motion control describe in the article.  Having a single point of programming makes system development simple and saves time.

However, that central PAC becomes a source of single-point failure unless suitable redundancy is built into the PAC hardware.



Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
An Israeli design student has created a series of unique pieces of jewelry that can harvest energy from default movements of the body and even use human blood as a way to conduct energy.
Made By Monkeys highlights products that somehow slipped by the QC cops.
Artificially created metamaterials are already appearing in niche applications like electronics, communications, and defense, says a new report from Lux Research. How quickly they become mainstream depends on cost-effective manufacturing methods, which will include additive manufacturing.
New software from Carnegie Mellon allows 2D objects -- digital photos, old photos, and even paintings -- to be manipulated in 3D using models found online.
Sharon Glotzer and David Pine are hoping to create the first liquid hard drive with liquid nanoparticles that can store 1TB per teaspoon. They aren't the first to find potential data stores, as Harvard researchers have stored 700 TB inside a gram of DNA.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/17/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
6/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
5/13/2014 10:00 a.m. California / 1:00 p.m. New York / 6:00 p.m. London
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Aug 18 - 22, Embedded Software Development With Python & the Raspberry Pi
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: September 30 - October 2
Sponsored by Altera
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service