HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Dave Palmer
User Rank
Platinum
Comparing processes
Dave Palmer   8/6/2012 12:31:33 PM
NO RATINGS
In most cases, casting a part versus machining it from bar stock is a no-brainer.  In my career, I've only come across one part that made more sense as a screw-machined part than as a die casting.  In that case, the geometry of the part made it extremely easy to screw machine.  Also, screw machining allowed the part to be made out of a much stronger wrought alloy.  It wound up being an 80% cost savings (from $4 to about 80¢), along with a more than 50% increase in strength.

But this is far from the norm, and as this article shows, casting is almost always much cheaper.  A more interesting comparison would be between die casting and powder metallurgy.  It would also be worthwhile to compare different casting processes (die casting, semi-solid processing, permanent mold, investment casting, lost foam, etc.).  In addition to cost, these processes also vary in terms of the mechanical properties and dimensional accuracy that can be achieved.

Greg M. Jung
User Rank
Platinum
Die Casting
Greg M. Jung   9/15/2012 3:36:50 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree that converting machined parts to die casting usually makes sense.  Because die casting tools can be expensive, it is important to first do a pay-back analysis and see if the volumes justify this change over.

In many cases we use both processes during the life of the product.  When the initial design is likely to change and we need to enter the market quickly, we may start with a machined part.  Then, as the design becomes stable and production volumes increase, we plan for a smooth cut-over to die cast tooling.

 



Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
The Strati EV car printed at the IMTS show is made of SABIC's LNP STAT KON AE003. SABIC tells Design News why this carbon fiber-reinforced compound was chosen by Local Motors and Oak Ridge National Laboratories.
The 2014 Ig Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to Dr. Kiyoshi Mabuchi and his team members for their work measuring the slipperiness of banana peels. Turns out they're slipperier with the yellow side up.
Many scientists have been working battery-free ways to power wearable electronics that can replace bulky battery packs, particularly through the use of energy-harvesting materials. Now a team of researchers in China have upped the game by developing a lightweight and flexible solar cell that can be woven into two-way energy-harvesting fabric.
Researchers in Canada have developed a chin strap that harvests energy from chewing and can potentially power a digital earplug that can provide both protection and communication capabilities.
In case you haven't heard, the deadline to enter the 2014 Golden Mousetrap Awards is coming up fast Oct. 28! Have you entered yet?
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
9/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
9/10/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
10/7/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Oct 20 - 24, How to Design & Build an Embedded Web Server: An Embedded TCP/IP Tutorial
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: October 2
Sponsored by Altera
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service