HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Comments
View Comments: Oldest First|Newest First|Threaded View
Page 1/2  >  >>
Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
How long it is really?
Rob Spiegel   7/26/2012 11:53:04 AM
NO RATINGS
This Sherlock Ohms posting is a great example of the danger of assuming. He asked for 10 feet of cable, he was given a length of cable. But he didn't check to make sure he actually received 10 feet of cable.

Tim
User Rank
Platinum
Re: How long it is really?
Tim   7/26/2012 12:17:02 PM
NO RATINGS
This is good evaluation of the method and the actual test. As a manufacturer, there are times that I have doubted the test when the result is not what you expect.

tekochip
User Rank
Platinum
Re: How long it is really?
tekochip   7/26/2012 2:09:10 PM
NO RATINGS
The real problem is that we rarely double check when we get the data we expect.

williamlweaver
User Rank
Platinum
Re: How long it is really?
williamlweaver   7/26/2012 9:06:53 PM
NO RATINGS
Trust, but Verify. This example belongs in a collection of wise tales and parables handed to each new measurement apprentice. When it comes to measurements, folks should not be offended when their data is double-checked but instead remind the receiver to re-check their measurements and calculations. Imagine how much unnecessary effort and research was avoided by checking the initial value...

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: How long it is really?
Rob Spiegel   7/27/2012 12:24:00 AM
NO RATINGS
I couldn't agree more, William. Yet I can certainly see how this happens. It takes conscious vigilance to avoid this kind of problem.

bobjengr
User Rank
Platinum
HOW LONG IS IT
bobjengr   7/27/2012 5:31:54 PM
NO RATINGS
  I'm not too sure how you get around this one.  One company I consult for has work instructions AND a check list AND employee training AND there are still errors made relative to measurements.  I will say this, we use a software package called MiniTab to perform Six Sigma calculations.  With this software package, it is fairly easy to discover measurement errors.  We always try to run a sample size of at least 30 pieces PER shift.  Sometimes when we are checking against critical-to-quality specifications, we collect samples every hour for analysis. Another important factor, we always measure and calculate for gage R&R and factor that into analyzing the final data. 

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Measure twice, cut once
Ann R. Thryft   7/30/2012 12:53:30 PM
NO RATINGS
Many years ago a VP of engineering I knew had a sign on his office wall: "Measure twice, cut once." I memorized that one, and it's been helpful for avoiding mistakes like this one. Of course, it's easier to observe this rule when it's just you doing the measuring both times. I like the "Trust, but verify" maxim. That maxim completes the first one.

Tim
User Rank
Platinum
Re: How long it is really?
Tim   7/30/2012 10:25:28 PM
NO RATINGS
Some manufacturers do not always see that it is better to reject a good part than pass a bad one.

William K.
User Rank
Platinum
inaccurate measurements and screwed-up data
William K.   8/2/2012 9:52:53 PM
NO RATINGS
The problem came from assuming that the directions had been accurately followed. I had a similar problem when a new tech grabbed a stack of incomplete circuit boards from a stack and then was challenging me that my design was no good because the boards didn't work. I wound up posting a general memo that "designs will not perform as required unless they are built as designed." The lab manager challenged me as to what it was about, and I explained to him that it meant that the circuit boards would not work correctly unless all of the parts were installed. He agreed that was a correct assertion, and cautioned that tech to only use circuit boards that had passed the final inspection. The non-calibrated boards seldom met the requirements, and the incomplete boards never met them.

Tool_maker
User Rank
Platinum
Re: inaccurate measurements and screwed-up data
Tool_maker   8/9/2012 4:56:04 PM
NO RATINGS
William: Your story really touches a raw nerve with me. I have lost count of how many times the "New Guy" finds errors where none exist merely because he wanted to impress somebody higher up with just how much he knows. Not all new guys, but a significant number.

Page 1/2  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Samsung's Galaxy line of smartphones used to fare quite well in the repairability department, but last year's flagship S5 model took a tumble, scoring a meh-inducing 5/10. Will the newly redesigned S6 lead us back into star-studded territory, or will we sink further into the depths of a repairability black hole?
Fifteen European research centers have launched EuroCPS to help European companies develop innovative products for the Internet of Things.
Get your Allman Brothers albums ready. The iconic Volkswagen Microbus may be poised for a comeback, and this time it could be electric.
In 2003, the world contained just over 500 million Internet-connected devices. By 2010, this figure had risen to 12.5 billion connected objects, almost six devices per individual with access to the Internet. Now, as we move into 2015, the number of connected 'things' is expected to reach 25 billion, ultimately edging toward 50 billion by the end of the decade.
NASA engineer Brian Trease studied abroad in Japan as a high school student and used to fold fast-food wrappers into cranes using origami techniques he learned in library books. Inspired by this, he began to imagine that origami could be applied to building spacecraft components, particularly solar panels that could one day send solar power from space to be used on earth.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
3/31/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
2/25/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
5/7/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Apr 20 - 24, Taking the Internet of Things to the Cloud
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Last Archived Class
Sponsored by Proto Labs
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service