HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
<<  <  Page 3/4  >  >>
robatnorcross
User Rank
Gold
Aside from having a professional driver...
robatnorcross   7/17/2012 8:06:44 PM
May be if the roads were MORE crowded people would begin (slowly) to migrate closer to work for their living quarters.

Even most "dumb" animals seem to figure out the best places to live and don't migrate too far from home. But then they don't have politicians that tell them "just stay where you are we will make things better.

The states keep telling us that more tax money will make for quicker commutes and keep our hopes up so no one moves. The only ones it seems to benefit are the asphalt paving people.

Freeways were originally designed to move military vehicles rapidly in the case of "Communist attack". Russia never attacked but finally crushed us with traffic jams.

Back in the old days people just wouldn't have lived 30 or 40 miles from work.

In my area it's common for people to spend 1 to 2 hours traveling to work.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Sending a mixed message
Charles Murray   7/17/2012 6:51:23 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree on both counts, Rob. On a gut level, I don't feel comfortable giving up control to an autonomous car. On the other hand, I think that in a hundred years, people will look back at our era and view us as primitive for having put up with 30,000 highway deaths per year (and that's just in the U.S.).

ricardo
User Rank
Silver
Re: Sending a mixed message
ricardo   7/17/2012 5:12:56 PM
We have had the technology to solve all these problems for over a century.  It's called a chauffeur.

TJ McDermott
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Sending a mixed message
TJ McDermott   7/17/2012 4:15:36 PM
NO RATINGS
Think of the lost time sitting behind a wheel in everyday commuter traffic that could be put to better use.  It's a two-fold savings, because the autonomous vehicles will supposedly handle traffic more efficiently.

apresher
User Rank
Blogger
Semi-Autonomous Driving
apresher   7/17/2012 2:55:58 PM
NO RATINGS
As much as this is interesting technology, I agree with Jhankwitz that the lawyers (or certain types of lawyers) would potentially have a field day with this.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Sending a mixed message
Rob Spiegel   7/17/2012 2:40:34 PM
NO RATINGS
I'm not crazy about the idea of fully autonomous, but if it saved lives, I would welcome it. I didn't like seatbelts at first. But the statistics on lives saved became compelling very quickly.

TJ McDermott
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Sending a mixed message
TJ McDermott   7/17/2012 1:31:31 PM
NO RATINGS
Ann, I would go the other way.  In the manner tha prohibition did not work, banning cell phone usage while driving doesn't work either.

The right approach is not "semi" autonomous.  Whole-hog full autonomy should be the goal, for sooner rather than later.  Semi is good for the short term (like diamond lanes on highways).

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Sending a mixed message
Ann R. Thryft   7/17/2012 1:15:02 PM
NO RATINGS
It sounds like a mixed message to me, too. I don't really get why automakers would want to encourage risky behavior. If drivers are breaking the law by texting or talking on the phone, then shouldn't they be cited? We don't make cars that accommodate drinking while driving, so why should we make cars that accommodate these habits?

Bryan Goss
User Rank
Gold
Re: What happens when it fails
Bryan Goss   7/17/2012 12:41:08 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes Jhankwitz, they have very deep pockets. I think that is why Jeremy Salinger of GM is pushing for the importances of drivers still being attentive, in the hopes of lessening their possibility of being held liable.

ChasChas
User Rank
Platinum
attentiveness
ChasChas   7/17/2012 11:31:42 AM
NO RATINGS
 

If the system still requires full driver attentiveness, the driver may as well be doing driving. It is a lot easier to be attentive if you have a dependent chore to do.

<<  <  Page 3/4  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Thanksgiving is a time for family. A time for togetherness. A time for… tech?
The promise of the Internet of Things (IoT) is that devices, gadgets, and appliances we use every day will be able to communicate with one another. This potential is not limited to household items or smartphones, but also things we find in our yard and garden, as evidenced by a recent challenge from the element14 design community.
Researchers have developed a new flexible fabric that integrates both movement and sensors, introducing new potential for technology-embedded clothing and soft robots.
Made by Monkeys highlights products that somehow slipped by the QC cops.
If you didn't realize that PowerPoint presentations are inherently hilarious, you have to see Don McMillan take one apart. McMillan -- aka the Technically Funny Comic -- worked for 10 years as an engineer before he switched to stand-up comedy.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
11/19/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
11/6/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
10/7/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Dec 1 - 5, An Introduction to Embedded Software Architecture and Design
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Last Archived Class
Sponsored by Littelfuse
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service