HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Page 1/4  >  >>
Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Kind of Sloppy, and very confusing
Ann R. Thryft   7/24/2012 1:22:00 PM
NO RATINGS
I think there are two different discussions here. Rob and tekochip ended up discussing how features do (or don't) end up in a product. But the missing magnet is not a feature: it's a design flaw. Jim and I were talking about what are, in effect, organizational structures that can blur the lines between brands, in the context of situations that dilute responsibility for product QA and testing and lead to the problem discussed in the article, the design flaw of the missing magnet.

JimT@Future-Product-Innovations
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Kind of Sloppy, and very confusing
JimT@Future-Product-Innovations   7/19/2012 1:39:01 AM
NO RATINGS
Whereas TekoChip seems to have very passionate defense of the practice (per the lengthy exchange between he and Rob) It looks to me like a white-washing of the issues.  (Pun appropriate and intended).

tekochip
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Kind of Sloppy, and very confusing
tekochip   7/17/2012 1:42:00 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes, brainstorming throughout the design includes everyone.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Kind of Sloppy, and very confusing
Rob Spiegel   7/17/2012 1:39:35 PM
NO RATINGS
So that means they are trying to anticipate features their customers will desire before their customers are able to articulate that desire. Are the engineers involved in the process to determine what features to develop?

tekochip
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Kind of Sloppy, and very confusing
tekochip   7/17/2012 1:34:53 PM
NO RATINGS
I wouldn't say repeating, they want to be ahead of the customer's needs and try to generate demand.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Kind of Sloppy, and very confusing
Rob Spiegel   7/17/2012 12:47:52 PM
NO RATINGS
Tekochip -- Do these tend to be technical people within marketing who are writing the specs (former engineers)? Or as they simply sales people who are repeating what the customer wants?

tekochip
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Kind of Sloppy, and very confusing
tekochip   7/17/2012 11:20:28 AM
NO RATINGS
In my experience Marketing writes the specification of what the device does and Engineering determines how to make the product.  Features don't come from Engineering they come from Marketing.  Certainly, there is a relationship between the two departments and a product benefits from technical and non-technical people brainstorming on what to include in the latest widget, but the specification on what a button does and where the button is located comes from Marketing.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Kind of Sloppy, and very confusing
Rob Spiegel   7/17/2012 10:19:32 AM
NO RATINGS
Is that common, Tekochip, that with retail products marketing makes the final decision? On what basis would they make the decision? Seems the needing it out in the market is not a sufficient reason to make a determination that the product is OK to produce ship.

tekochip
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Kind of Sloppy, and very confusing
tekochip   7/17/2012 7:51:22 AM
NO RATINGS
Very true.  I'm sure we've all lobbied hard to have a failing "feature" removed, only to have marketing tell us that they make the final decision.


Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Kind of Sloppy, and very confusing
Rob Spiegel   7/16/2012 11:23:01 PM
NO RATINGS
Perhaps you're right, Tekochip. Yet sometimes it doesn't seem like they've tested their systems sufficiently. Sometimes it seems they haven't worked out all of the quality issues with their equipment. Otherwise there would be no Made by Monkeys column. It could be that manufacturers have worked out most of the bugs, and then faulty components lead the system to fail. 

Page 1/4  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Take a look at the top 20 US undergraduate engineering programs. Then tell us -- did your school make the cut?
Producing high-quality end-production metal parts with additive manufacturing for applications like aerospace and medical requires very tightly controlled processes and materials. New standards and guidelines for machines and processes, materials, and printed parts are underway from bodies such as ASTM International.
Engineers at the University of San Diego’s Jacobs School of Engineering have designed biobatteries on commercial tattoo paper, with an anode and cathode screen-printed on and modified to harvest energy from lactate in a person’s sweat.
A Silicon Valley company has made the biggest splash yet in the high-performance end of the electric car market, announcing an EV that zips from 0 to 60 mph in 3.4 seconds and costs $529,000.
The biggest robot swarm to date is made of 1,000 Kilobots, which can follow simple rules to autonomously assemble into predetermined shapes. Hardware and software are open-source.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/17/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
6/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
5/13/2014 10:00 a.m. California / 1:00 p.m. New York / 6:00 p.m. London
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Sep 8 - 12, Get Ready for the New Internet: IPv6
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: September 30 - October 2
Sponsored by Altera
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service