I really like how you emphasize the "judicious introduction" of time delays. I have seen some folks use time delays as a quick fix without carefully evaluating their effect on the entire system, which can either be a great solution or it can introduce other errors in subtle ways.
I have been involved in developing, improving and consulting anything related with control system for the last 15 years in electronics component testing and automation system. Time delay is really important and at some cases it is the only mean to solve the problems.
When the control loop is some derivative of a PID loop, maintaining phase is very good advice.
When there are unavoidable delays present in the system, your suggestion of some kind of "wait and act" strategy is probably good advice. When you think about it, adding a delay in the control loop is just another way to "conserve phase".
Engineers at Fuel Cell Energy have found a way to take advantage of a side reaction, unique to their carbonate fuel cell that has nothing to do with energy production, as a potential, cost-effective solution to capturing carbon from fossil fuel power plants.
To get to a trillion sensors in the IoT that we all look forward to, there are many challenges to commercialization that still remain, including interoperability, the lack of standards, and the issue of security, to name a few.
This is part one of an article discussing the University of Washington’s nationally ranked FSAE electric car (eCar) and combustible car (cCar). Stay tuned for part two, tomorrow, which will discuss the four unique PCBs used in both the eCar and cCars.
Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.