HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
GlennA
User Rank
Gold
Part IV ?
GlennA   6/6/2012 2:26:24 PM
NO RATINGS
Is there going to be a Part IV describing the 'anti-alias filter' ?

Jon Titus
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Part IV ?
Jon Titus   6/6/2012 3:08:06 PM
NO RATINGS
Hi, Glenn.  Thanks for your question. I can cover anti-alias filters in another installment, but you'll find many good references and application notes.  Here's a link to one from Maxim: http://www.maxim-ic.com/app-notes/index.mvp/id/928, and one from Microchip: http://jimfranklin.info/microchipdatasheets/00699b.pdf.

Let me know if you still want more about anti-alias filters.  My upcoming columns on oversampling explain how using this technique helps eliminate an anti-alias filter for some measurements.

Nancy Golden
User Rank
Platinum
Software Solution?
Nancy Golden   7/30/2012 10:58:47 AM
NO RATINGS
Great information, Jon - I love your series and how it addresses so many relevant issues in test engineering. I was wondering since this is a mathematical function - is it possible to write a software algorithm to eliminate the unwanted data points and if so - would a hardware solution (anti-aliasing filter) or a software solution (algorithm) be more advantageous - or is that simply a matter of available resources?

Jon Titus
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Software Solution?
Jon Titus   7/30/2012 5:42:21 PM
NO RATINGS
A software algorithm would have the same problem as people.  It could not distinguish the points from the "wanted" signal from those points acquired by an almost unlimited number of higher-frequency signals.  An anti-alias filter will help.  I find it better to eliminate any source of unwanted signals--noise--as close to the source as possible.  More about filters and how to choose them in my next column.

Nancy Golden
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Software Solution?
Nancy Golden   7/30/2012 6:00:34 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks, Jon. I agree that it is always better for the data to be "real" and noise eliminated at the source is always best which also eliminates the need for data to be massaged by software - I was just wondering if it was an option in this case. Thanks for the information!



Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
The Industrial Internet of Things may be going off the deep end in connecting everything on the plant floor. Some machines, bearings, or conveyors simply donít need to be monitored -- even if they can be.
Wind turbines already are imposing structures that stretch high into the sky, but an engineering graduate student at the University of Notre Dame wants to make them even taller to reduce energy costs and improve efficiency.
Ray Zinn, Silicon Valley's longest-running CEO, shares some of his thoughts on innovation, procrastination, and why you shouldn't put customers first.
Researchers at American University have produced chemically active structures that, not unlike living things, can actually do things on their own without an external power.
Former DARPA official and Google executive Dr. Kaigham Gabriel believes sensor companies think too much like suppliers and need to bring their products closer to the consumer.
More:Blogs|News
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7 | 8 | 9 | 10


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Course June 28-30:
Sponsored by Proto Labs
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2016 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service