HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
<<  <  Page 5/8  >  >>
ricardo
User Rank
Silver
Re: What do you expect?
ricardo   6/7/2012 7:43:37 PM
I can't think of any Chinese technology that hasn't been pilfered from the west or Russia.  Can anyone???

Err..rh!  The compass, the rudder, printing and of course gunpowder, the invention that the West refined to the present state of art for its most innovative and popular pursuit, killing people.

Sure, the Chinese aren't a threat to American industry & innovation.  Neither were Shoichiro Honda and Akio Morita.

 

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Electric Bicycles?
Charles Murray   6/7/2012 7:09:13 PM
NO RATINGS
Great NYT link, Beth. Thanks.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Incentive may not be strong enough
Charles Murray   6/7/2012 6:49:40 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree, Sport. I'm not a conspiracy buff, but the idea of collusion wouldn't shock me. At the moment, the lack of a high-energy battery makes collusion less necessary.  

Watashi
User Rank
Platinum
Re: What do you expect?
Watashi   6/7/2012 4:43:55 PM
Oh, forgot to note - The German Sturmgewehr 44 was the base design the Ak47 was stolen from.  Mikhail did improve its reliability, but definitely started with a fine German design.

Watashi
User Rank
Platinum
Re: What do you expect?
Watashi   6/7/2012 4:37:21 PM
The American J. Walter Christie was responsible for the Soviet Union's T-34 which was the one that proved superior to Germany's panzers. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Walter_Christie

Russian post war advances and engineering culture came at the hands of captured German scientists.  The cold war provided an external 'threat' that compelled the tyrannical USSR to permit innovation in military arms.  That and the extensive spy network of the KGB that stole US, British, and other allied designs.

The Chinese were good customers of the Russians until they decided that they could go into business for themselves.  They started building knock-off Russian jets much to the behest of their 'friends'.  I guess there is a case to be made for Karma.

I never said American engineers are superior.  But the fact is, for various reasons, since WWII we have excelled to the head of the class. There is no guarantee that we will remain the leaders, particularly with this administration in office.  But free market systems and free people will always lead the repressed.  Marxist and tyrannical nations will always be inferior - as proven by the 20th century.

tomw
User Rank
Iron
Re: Comparing apples and oranges
tomw   6/7/2012 3:13:09 PM
NO RATINGS
Few new EVs are using lead acid batteries, but they can be fitted with reformers to capture vented hydrogen and oxygen.  The mass flow in a lead acid cell is almost nil compared to an ICE.  Just compare the exhaust pipe on a typical car to the vents on a battery. 

Both the ICE and battery use the air for cooling.  But the battery will typically produce much less heat for the same output.

ScotCan
User Rank
Platinum
Re: What do you expect?
ScotCan   6/7/2012 3:01:23 PM
The old Soviet Union cranked out better tanks than the Nazis in World War 2, their Kalishnikovs were more reliable than either the Allies or the Nazis equipment. Their aerodynamists are among the best in the world and their computer scientists and engineers are well respected generally. Again if the commenter was not so Americentric statements like the above would not be made...the communist regime took a feudal autocracy from wooden plows and made it into a modern industrial nation and fought a successful war against the Nazis with little help from its Western allies....no amount of American propaganda is going to deny these historical facts

Watashi
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Chinese (American) Technology
Watashi   6/7/2012 2:50:45 PM
NO RATINGS
Mea Culpa - I should have said "Western" as I did in a later post.  I do appreciate Brit technology prowess (and not just because I work for a brit owned company).

I also recall some recent Aussie complaints about Chinese IP theft.

ScotCan
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Chinese (American) Technology
ScotCan   6/7/2012 2:44:53 PM
Oh come on now! The Chinese do not need to reverse engineer anything any more than Americans. The idea that success can only stem from the US is nonsense...the British helicopter BERP rotors is proof of that! Curiously enough there is very little reporting in this magazine on what the Brits are doing(or for that matter the Europeans) where EV's are concerned. In this age of globalization one would expect less Americentric smugness...the real problem with EV's is that scaling up to autos was too big a jump....E-Scooters work just fine because at that scale and weight, the batteries can manage using simple controllers.

Watashi
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Comparing apples and oranges
Watashi   6/7/2012 2:41:37 PM
NO RATINGS
What kind of battery are you writing about? The most common lead acid batteries vent to the atmosphere throughout their lifetime.

<<  <  Page 5/8  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Take a look through these film and TV robots from 1990 through 1994.
The Soofa is an urban smart bench that provides mobile device charging as well as collects environmental information via wireless sensors.
Sciaky, provider of electron-beam additive manufacturing (EBAM) services, will start selling these machines commercially in September. The company has used its EBAM 3D printing technology for making very large, high-value, metal prototypes and production parts for aerospace and defense OEMs.
At this year’s Google I/O, the spotlight was pointed on gender inequality in the high-tech industry. Google has established a new initiative that it hopes will even out the playing field, Made w/Code. Part of this initiative will fund free online courses in basic coding.
Self-driving vehicle technology could grow rapidly over the next two decades, with nearly 95 million “autonomous-capable” cars being sold annually around the world by 2035, a new study predicts.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/17/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
6/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
5/13/2014 10:00 a.m. California / 1:00 p.m. New York / 6:00 p.m. London
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Aug 4 - 8, Introduction to Linux Device Drivers
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: August 12 - 14
Sponsored by igus
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service