I think what it comes down to, Old Curmudgeon, is a corporate culture that values short-term savings. In the long run, no serious executive can argue that poor quality makes the company stronger. But cutting corners makes them look like heroes -- for a short time, anyway. Sparsely-populated parking lots certainly aren't their goal, but the geniuses who place value on the short term fix usually aren't around to see the results of their decisions.
According to the manual I mentioned earlier I have a Toro 20031 with a 22" steel deck, a single speed bevel gear system (new in 2002) a second generation Personal Pace drive system, and spring racket wheel pinions (Fig 112 page 3-26)
Front wheel drive mowers should have a non-differential direct drive.You do not need it because you lift the front wheels when you turn the mower.The problem with these mowers is that the wheels slip in the grass when mowing up steep hills.I remember as a kid having to lift the rear of the mower off the ground to get enough weight on the front wheel to give it traction to power up an embankment.Remember Fictional Force = Us x Cos(angle) x weight.Rear wheel drive naturally applies that pressure to move up hills and you don't have to do that awkward rear lift.
My rear wheel drive mower it needs a differential for me to turn.But it also needs a direct drive so I have 2 wheel traction and don't become a spinning one wheel wonder.So does it have a possi traction system?Well yes it does.....in a way.It uses a cleaver racketing pinion gear.The pinion key is spring loaded in the shaft and the pinion keyway is flat on one side and ramped on the other.So it will racket forward but not backward.Cool design.So most of the problems with my wheels slipping is not from engaging gears (because mine are always engaged) .The problem is caused by my deck and adjustable wheel height mechanism is that it is compliant.It is sheet metal and not perfectly rigid so it will bend slightly and the pinion gear will slip.The cool thing is my variable speed is controlled by belt slip.It only requires one hand ...and even one finger to push my mower forward.That pushing on the handle is transferred to the bevel gear housing and it will pivot the pulley loosing and tightening the belt.The speed is variable up to 4.8 mph. I don't like the slipping belt slipping in the design because I thought it would wear out fast, but I have not had to replace it in since I bought the mower in 2004.
My (Sears) mower does not have a differential drive like in a car. When one wheel slips, the other wheel still pulls. IMO, a differential drive would not be a good idea on a mower where the terrain is uneven.
I have to agree with you about the Sears / Kmart match-up, Old Curmudgeon. What you described about the parking lots is very much true where I live. I did some very late Christmas shopping mid-day on Christmas Eve at Kmart and the store wasn't even crowded. The lines at the check-out were one or two people deep.
Dead on the money ChasChas! The gears should engage fully before the belt tightens, thus always being fully meshed before any power is applied.
The gear disengagement is necessary to allow the mower to be pushed manually.
With regard to other posts about controlling speed: I've always controlled the speed by applying downward pressure on the handle to allow the front wheels to slip. That's why they put power to the FRONT wheels!
I have a Toro with the variable walking speed drive.I too have not looked at how it works, but I understand that these wheels will have to be replaced from time to time when they start slipping.I was made aware of that fact after I bought the mower by a friend that used to work for the city and had to replace them all the time.My drive skips on steep parts of my yard and makes a nasty sounding cogging noise.I have not tried fixing it yet, but I am hopping they use the same wheels in the front as they do in the back.So when my gears or cogs become worn I can just "rotate" the tires.
This place in MN has some pretty good prices...I just checked my price $19 per wheel!!!
1) Seems to me that there should have been a two-stage linkage for the motion drive mechanism. The one stage would force the proper engagement of the driving gears into the wheel gears, and the "feathering" for motion control should have been accomplished w/ the "pressure that the drive belt exerted on the driving shaft sheave. Ultimately, the V-belt would have been the sacrificial element in this drive, and since V-belts are considered consumer items & consumables, they're available at a wide range of outlets including automotive stores, etc.
2) Regarding the SEARS / K-MART alliance. I believe that was one of the worst corporate marriages to come down the pike in many a decade. In this Tampa Bay area, and more specifically in our immediate hometown area, we have FOUR WAL*MART outlets, within bicycling distance, and ONE SAM'S CLUB. We also have TWO K-MART stores & ONE SEARS store. Driving past these outlets is very revealing, and is NOT tied to time of day OR day of week. The K-MART parking lots have a handful of vehicles parked, while the WAL*MART stores show almost full parking lots (and I'm NOT just relating at Christmas time!). The Sears store is a general merchandise store, including an automotive service center. Interestingly, it is located at the end of a very large mall, also populated w/ BEST BUY, DILLARDS, J.C. PENNEY, MACY*S (formerly Burdines), etc. The parking lot area in front of the Sears store is very modestly populated. I believe Sears would have been far better off to remain independent, while at the same time trimming their product lines to include only their "core" businesses, which are tools, appliances, & automotive accessories & light repair.
While General Motors wasn't the first to apply plastic to a gearing system, they sure made a bundle out of it. From about 1968 to 1976, Pontiac introduced their plastic coated cam timing chain gear. Ostensibly, it was to "quiet down" the noise the two cam timing gears and chain made during normal engine operation. Of course, the difference in noise could be measured in practically negative decibels.
Normal timing gear/chain lifetime used to typically exceed 100k miles - even in those days. With the plastic coated gear, one never exceed 65k miles - if you were that lucky. and it always happened on the road and required a tow. At least at 100k miles, you knew from experience what to expect, and premature timing gear failure was not one of them.
The replacement, whether from GM or aftermarket, was always all steel. Gee!
Planned obsolescence? Even back then the accountants and management were already working their magic.
By the time the NTSC got involved, it was too late. GM had already changed back to the all-steel gears, and the gov't chose not to pursue the problem any more.
I've had the same problem with mowers sold by Home Depot and Toro. The HD one had teeth on the inside of the "back" side of the rim. The Toro I'm currently using has a gear molded into the back side of the hub. The Toro is supposed to adjust its speed to match your walking pace. I've never done a teardown to figure out how it is doing that.
My dad had a mower when I was a teenager where a knurled or toothed wheel engaged the tread of two tires (front or rear, I can't remember). Pretty sure that the system was adjustable but eventually you need new tires because, again, the drive was more durable than the driven wheels.
Some of the comments seem to be talking about tractors or more industrial types of mowers. I read this as a typical residential, walk-behind mower with self-propulsion. Most of these don't have real speed adjustments (other than the Toro).
Truchard will be presented the award at the 2014 Golden Mousetrap Awards ceremony during the co-located events Pacific Design & Manufacturing, MD&M West, WestPack, PLASTEC West, Electronics West, ATX West, and AeroCon.
In a bid to boost the viability of lithium-based electric car batteries, a team at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory has developed a chemistry that could possibly double an EV’s driving range while cutting its battery cost in half.
For industrial control applications, or even a simple assembly line, that machine can go almost 24/7 without a break. But what happens when the task is a little more complex? That’s where the “smart” machine would come in. The smart machine is one that has some simple (or complex in some cases) processing capability to be able to adapt to changing conditions. Such machines are suited for a host of applications, including automotive, aerospace, defense, medical, computers and electronics, telecommunications, consumer goods, and so on. This discussion will examine what’s possible with smart machines, and what tradeoffs need to be made to implement such a solution.