HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Page 1/2  >  >>
apresher
User Rank
Blogger
Rare Earth Shortages
apresher   5/16/2012 8:25:15 AM
NO RATINGS
Kristin, Excellent article.  I know some suppliers are moving to SR technology as a way to improve the performance of induction motor systems.  A key advantage is that SR motors can be paired up with variable speed drives to the eliminate slip losses associated with induction motors while also boosting efficiency and create more compact sizes. Other benefits of the technology are related to higher reliability. The rotor construction itself is robust, plus there is no squirrel cage on the rotor side.  Great series on rare earth shortages.

Jon Titus
User Rank
Blogger
Excellent!
Jon Titus   5/16/2012 12:03:00 PM
NO RATINGS
Wow, this has been an informative series of articles. Thank you for the research and deep insight into not only the rare-earth elements, but also motor design. Much appreciated.

TJ McDermott
User Rank
Blogger
Relative cost?
TJ McDermott   5/16/2012 1:39:03 PM
NO RATINGS
Kristin, do you have numbers for the cost of an SR motor compared to a conventional induction motor?

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Excellent!
Charles Murray   5/16/2012 6:00:54 PM
NO RATINGS
Fantastic series, Kristin. You've provided in-depth information at a time when design engineers sorely need it.

Jerry dycus
User Rank
Gold
Re: Excellent!
Jerry dycus   5/16/2012 7:50:04 PM
NO RATINGS
 

            I said this on the first article, we have used non REE motors, generators  for 140 yrs or so and could even be better without them as better control and far more starting torque and peak power, things REE's don't do well.

            Where is any mention of brushed motors like series, sep-ex, compound that ran the industural age?  These in many ways are superior especially in tractive uses like EV's as they can stand far more heat, thus make more peak power.  Add to that the controllers are 1/3 the cost and weight.

             Only in the last yr has AC come anywhere near being as cost effective as these and I still have to pay 100% more for the joy of AC.  That of course would raise the EV price by $2-3k and accepting lower starting power for that joy. 

              Another benefit is in smaller EV's the use of lower voltages lowering cell count, controller costs.

              The cost of this is brushes that need to be changed in 100k miles or so but likely the bearings will needed anyway in DC or more likely in AC,  so little extra cost in real life. 

               Improvements that don't do better at lower costs than past alternatives are not improvements.

                Now in small wind generators REE's are hard to beat. I know as I've tried and building the production prototype now for a home size 3kw cost effective unit.

            Luckily I've cut the needed REE's by 75% and if tests work out, 87.5% compared to the present competition.  It looks like I'll even beat the Chinese WG's  on price/proven  kw/mph and destory them in quality.

ChasChas
User Rank
Platinum
Not out of the woods, yet.
ChasChas   5/17/2012 9:49:48 AM
NO RATINGS
 

Excellent engineering advice in this article, but it sure adds complexity to motor design - and engineering/prototyping/testing isn't free. Seems like many industries will still be forced to pay the higher price of REE. 

bdcst
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Relative cost?
bdcst   5/17/2012 10:46:54 AM
NO RATINGS
I wonder how switched reluctance motors compare with other designs regarding cogging?  Where motion has to be fluid, cogging can add vibration and velocity errors, flutter.  This was an issue in the days of analog magnetic tape transport design.  But that era is long gone.

SparkyWatt
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Relative cost?
SparkyWatt   5/17/2012 1:27:52 PM
NO RATINGS
Do you mean "cogging" or "torque ripple"?  Torque ripple is an effect where the torque is reduced as the magnetic field moves from pole to pole in an AC motor or stepper motor or as a commutated motor switches windings.  It stems from the fact that the rotor doesn't see a uniform magnetic field as it rotates.  "Cogging" on the other hand is an effect commonly seen in stepper motors, but also appears in AC motors, where a motor under a heavy load slips back a full pole.  "Cogging" is a catastrophic failure, because in most cases onee it happens, it continues to happen.  The motor stops rotating and is subjected to an alternating torque of its full rated torque.  This is usually loud and often destructive.

I suspect that SR motors don't cog, because the switching follows the rotor, similar to brushless DC motors.  An overloaded motor would just slow down and stop switching.

I have no idea what their torque ripple performance is like.

bdcst
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Relative cost?
bdcst   5/17/2012 5:20:10 PM
NO RATINGS
Terminology, cogging versus torque ripple.  Well...back in the early days of reel to reel audio tape recording Ampex was the pre-eminent manufacturer of tape decks.  They employed Bodine hysteresis synchronous motors to drive the tape deck capstan.  With a heavy flywheel as a low pass filter, both bearing noise and flutter could be reduced.  That style motor could be made to exhibit a much higher degree of tape playback flutter.  I suppose you could call it torque ripple since the effect was milder than slipping or skipping a pole.

If, while the capstan motor was energized, you changed its speed by switching windings, it would induce a temporary magnetization of the armature that would produce noticeable flutter.  Simply de-energizing the motor and re-energizing it would erase the slight ripple effect.

SparkyWatt
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Relative cost?
SparkyWatt   5/17/2012 6:41:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes, I've noticed that different groups use terminology differently.  It results in no end of confusion.  That is why I took the trouble to clarify.  It is possible that people in your industry use the term "cogging" differently than the areas I have been around.

What can you do?  Language is organically grown and sprouts from many roots.

Sounds like the effect you are talking about comes from using a "soft" material for the motor's core.  The core becomes magnetized, and therefore "sees" the gaps between the poles.  When I took motor construction in 1980, that was considered a bad idea.  A soft material would usually increase the torque of the motor for a given geometry, but lower its efficiency (it increased the core losses) and causes that form of ripple.

Of course, today that would be a concern also because it increases the motor's electrical emissions.

I am not into SR motors, but my guess would be that (like other styles of motors) it is dependant on the "hardness" of the material used for the rotor.  A "hard" material would show very little effect.

And Ampex did make wonderful tape decks.

Page 1/2  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Advertised as the "Most Powerful Tablet Under $100," the Kindle Fire HD 6 was too tempting for the team at iFixit to pass up. Join us to find out if inexpensive means cheap, irreparable, or just down right economical. It's teardown time!
The first photos made with a 3D-printed telescope are here and they're not as fuzzy as you might expect. A team from the University of Sheffield beat NASA to the goal. The photos of the Moon were made with a reflecting telescope that cost the research team 100 to make (about $161 US).
At Medical Design & Manufacturing Midwest, Joe Wascow told Design News how Optimal Design prototyped a machine that captures the wing-beat of a duck.
The increased adoption of wireless technology for mission-critical applications has revved up the global market for dynamic electronic general purpose (GP) test equipment. As the link between cloud networks and devices -- smartphones, tablets, and notebooks -- results in more complex devices under test, the demand for radio frequency test equipment is starting to intensify.
Much of the research on lithium-ion batteries is focused on how to make the batteries charge more quickly and last longer than they currently do, work that would significantly improve the experience of mobile device users, as well EV and hybrid car drivers. Researchers in Singapore have come up with what seems like the best solution so far -- a battery that can recharge itself in mere minutes and has a potential lifespan of 20 years.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
10/7/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
9/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
9/10/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Oct 20 - 24, How to Design & Build an Embedded Web Server: An Embedded TCP/IP Tutorial
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: 10/28-10/30 11:00 AM
Sponsored by Stratasys
Next Class: 10/28-10/30 2:00 PM
Sponsored by Gates Corporation
Next Class: 11/11-11/13 2:00 PM
Sponsored by Littelfuse
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service