HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Page 1/2  >  >>
YJ77
User Rank
Silver
Re: Two words ...
YJ77   5/17/2012 11:29:55 PM
NO RATINGS
Hearkens back to Dale Brown's novel Sky Masters, fictional company producing NIRSATs [Need It Rightnow Satellites]

ChasChas
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Use & Throw Satellites
ChasChas   5/17/2012 5:49:44 PM
NO RATINGS
Low orbit altitude is defined as 100 - 1240 miles high. Any pilot that goes over 50 miles up or higher gains an astronaut rating. The lower the orbit, the lower the speed needed. I don't know what altitude will sustain a satellite for 3 months, but I would think it can lower than 100 miles.  Anyone?

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Use & Throw Satellites
Charles Murray   5/17/2012 5:25:26 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks, ChasChas. So how do we define "very low orbit?"

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Space junk items and collisions
Rob Spiegel   5/17/2012 12:06:23 PM
NO RATINGS

In the articles I've seen on space debris, I haven't seen anything about clean-up. Not sure you can. NASA is tracking it, though. As for a satellite that disposes of itself, I don't see how that happens in space unless it is sent into the atmosphere, which would burn it up.

 

Rockymtnrick
User Rank
Iron
Re: Disposable Satellites
Rockymtnrick   5/17/2012 11:48:59 AM
NO RATINGS
It's good these satellites are launched in a way they become self-disposing.  But touting the price ignores the cost/benefit ratio.  Yes, they are a fraction of the cost, but you get a small fraction of the capacity, for a small fraction of the coverage area, for a small fraction of the day, for a small fraction of the nominal service life of other SATCOM systems.  There is nothing lost in looking at technologies, and plenty to be gained from a pragmatic evaluation of the VALUE of these kinds of solutions.  Sometimes it just makes sense to spend more, add another future-junk-satellite to the list, and get greater utility out of our tax dollar.

ChasChas
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Use & Throw Satellites
ChasChas   5/17/2012 11:15:07 AM
NO RATINGS
 

The President Clinton answer is that it depends on what space is.

Very low orbit altitude is reached by some balloons and the X-15. It's not very useful for most space exploration, but for this application it is fine. It'll stay up for a few months.

TJ McDermott
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Space junk items and collisions
TJ McDermott   5/17/2012 12:19:24 AM
NO RATINGS

Beth, it depends on how high the debris is.  Junk in LEO will come down by itself, eventually.  Skylab did, as did Kosmos 954 (scattered radioactive debris over a 600 km swath of Canada in 1978).  They were in fairly low orbits.

The toolbag that slipped away from a spacewalking astronaut in November 2008 eventually reentered in August 2009.  The space station orbits at about 230 miles above the surface.

The higher the junk is, the longer it stays up.  Satellites in geosynchronous orbit (22,000 miles aren't going to come down, which poses a different problem.  The geosynchronous orbit is unique (a satellite orbiting the equator at that altitude appears motionless to an observer on the ground), and the real estate there is precious.  When geosynch satellites are decommisioned, they now get boosted even higher, up out of that special orbit, to make room for new satellites.

Cleaning up the orbitals is going to cost.  Getting some sort of device up there to pick up the garbage is going to cost $2000-$10000 per POUND just to get the device into orbit.


Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Use & Throw Satellites
Charles Murray   5/16/2012 6:36:53 PM
NO RATINGS
Naperlou, thanks for your thoughts on the launch issue. My first reaction when I saw this video is, how can they launch so easily? (Anyway, it looks easy in the video.) NASA's fabled X-programs spent decades trying to launch aircraft (like the National Aerospace Plane) into space, with limited success. They found that flying into space is difficult. That's why NASA spent so many years dropping gigantic multi-million-dollar booster rockets into the ocean. So how are they able to launch these things into space with such apparent ease?

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Space junk items and collisions
Ann R. Thryft   5/16/2012 6:35:06 PM
NO RATINGS
Beth, space junk has been a growing problem for decades. The idea of sending yet more trash into orbit appalls me, too. The only "disposable" products of any kind we should be making these days should be compostable or recyclable. The myth that things can be thrown "away" becomes even m ore obvious when you look at space junk. There is no "away" in a closed system.

Beth Stackpole
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Space junk items and collisions
Beth Stackpole   5/16/2012 3:23:29 PM
NO RATINGS
I guess I'm either naive or aren't as up to date on the current state of space exploration. I am absolutely appalled by that news. Does anyone know if we have programs to clean it up or if that is even possible? What happens to the debris--it just floats around forever?

Page 1/2  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
The engineers and inventors of the post WWII period turned their attention to advancements in electronics, communication, and entertainment. Breakthrough inventions range from LEGOs and computer gaming to the integrated circuit and Ethernet -- a range of advancements that have little in common except they changed our lives.
The age of touch could soon come to an end. From smartphones and smartwatches, to home devices, to in-car infotainment systems, touch is no longer the primary user interface. Technology market leaders are driving a migration from touch to voice as a user interface.
Soft starter technology has become a way to mitigate startup stressors by moderating a motor’s voltage supply during the machine start-up phase, slowly ramping it up and effectively adjusting the machine’s load behavior to protect mechanical components.
A new report from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) makes a start on developing control schemes, process measurements, and modeling and simulation methods for powder bed fusion additive manufacturing.
If you’re developing a product with lots of sensors and no access to the power grid, then you’ll want to take note of a Design News Continuing Education Center class, “Designing Low Power Systems Using Battery and Energy Harvesting Energy Sources."
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
3/31/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
2/25/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
5/7/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
May 4 - 8, Designing Low Power Systems using Battery and Energy Harvesting Energy Sources
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Last Archived Class
Sponsored by Proto Labs
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service