HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Page 1/4  >  >>
Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Any possibility of commercial applicability?
Rob Spiegel   5/23/2012 2:32:33 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes, I remember the difficulties with component tracking and part numbers. For some reason REACH didn't see to cause the same consternation. At least not that I noticed. I guess it's becasue REACH was more of a reporting function.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Any possibility of commercial applicability?
Ann R. Thryft   5/23/2012 12:47:53 PM
NO RATINGS
Actually, among the high-end embedded board-level products we covered, RoHS seemed to affect most the manufacturers that served both mil and commercial customers, since they often ended up running two separate lines for two different versions of the "same" product. Mil-only board manufacturers were  not affected much until later. One thing that did affect them both was the nightmare of components tracking and part numbers changing.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Any possibility of commercial applicability?
Rob Spiegel   5/22/2012 3:00:19 PM
NO RATINGS
Cool subject for a magazine. Yes, I can imagine you covered RoHS quite a bit, since it had a major impact on the COTS market.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Any possibility of commercial applicability?
Ann R. Thryft   5/22/2012 2:38:13 PM
NO RATINGS
Since there were only two of us, myself and the editor-in-chief, I did a little of everything. Mostly we did not address distribution, but design and development technologies for HW and SW, comms, and a lot of board-level products and technologies. I wrote several features on RoHS, too.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Any possibility of commercial applicability?
Rob Spiegel   5/22/2012 1:58:17 PM
NO RATINGS
You worked for COTS Journal. Wow. What did you cover? The components market? Distribution?

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Any possibility of commercial applicability?
Ann R. Thryft   5/22/2012 1:24:43 PM
NO RATINGS
As I learned working for COTS Journal, COTS doesn't just mean actual end-system computers and apps software. It can also refer more broadly to both software and hardware design and development platforms, specifically for creating end-system hardware and software used in the field. Ruggedization is taken for granted for military field use; that feature doesn't determine whether a machine is COTS. A COTS-based machine may also be further tweaked--and usually is--for specific apps. The big difference is that the military is no longer spending zillions of dollars on proprietary, entirely customized systems.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Any possibility of commercial applicability?
Rob Spiegel   5/22/2012 1:16:09 PM
NO RATINGS
What I've heard is that the COTS stuff is used for office and support functions. When it comes to electronics out in the field, the electronics are ruggedized (and leaded) so they can withstand a difficult environment over many years.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Any possibility of commercial applicability?
Ann R. Thryft   5/22/2012 11:59:30 AM
NO RATINGS
EV Race Car

The COTS systems, platforms, networking technologies, and software are, as the term says, commercial off-the-shelf hardware and software, meaning stuff that's originally designed and built for the rest of us. Basically, that means the military is using Windows-based laptops and other standard commercial hardware and software, as well as standard networking protocols, which is actually kind of scary. This is instead of spending zillions of dollars on designing their own stuff, like in the "good old days." Even the NSA buys a lot of standard signal-processing equipment.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Any possibility of commercial applicability?
Rob Spiegel   5/21/2012 2:27:19 PM
NO RATINGS
I wasn't aware of that, Ann. I thought they were just cheap commodity parts. But it makes sense that systems and platforms could become commodity items that could be used in a variety of products.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Let's say
Ann R. Thryft   5/21/2012 2:14:31 PM
NO RATINGS
Interestingly, many of the older "antiques"--more like family heirlooms--in my house are made of bio-based materials, such as wood and paper (which also used to be considered sustainable materials until we nearly used them up), or ceramics and brick, which are sustainable. Even metals were sustainable, and still are. Most of these materials are commonly found in the rubbish heaps of our ancestors, and give archaeologists a lot to study. Much of the problem with materials becoming non-sustainable has occurred in more recent times because of overuse (due in part to enormous population growth), as well as because of newer materials with complex processes and polluting wastes.

Page 1/4  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Just how far has handheld gaming technology come? Let's take a look inside the Nintendo 3DS XL and find out.
Design, simulation, manufacturability, and prototyping: All of these phases are being pushed forward and progressively by underlying technologies.
Wal-Mart will hold its second Made in the USA Open Call July 7-8, at its headquarters in Bentonville, Ark. The event will be a repeat effort by the world’s biggest seller of consumer goods to increase the amount of US-made products it sells in Wal-Mart stores, in Sam’s Club members-only wholesale outlets, and on walmart.com.
From design feasibility, to development, to production, having the right information to make good decisions can ultimately keep a product from failing validation. The key is highly focused information that doesn’t come from conventional, statistics-based tests but from accelerated stress testing.
There’s a good chance that a few of the things mentioned here won't fully come to fruition in 2015 but rather much later down the line. However, as Malcolm X once said, "The future belongs to those who prepare for it today."
More:Blogs|News
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Jul 6 - 10, Building Raspberry Pi Controllers with Python
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service