HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Comments
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
<<  <  Page 3/3
ScotCan
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Common Assumption
ScotCan   5/4/2012 4:21:03 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes, that happens often. Another example... quite common...was the disgruntled consumer who complained that a brand new set of batteries for his flashlight were no good. We changed a blown bulb for him and hel calmed down.

ScotCan
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Check and Double Check ?
ScotCan   5/4/2012 4:15:54 PM
NO RATINGS
To be fair to the previous investigators, none of them were trouble shooters...they were parachuted into a situation which was sporadic in nature because of the two sets of tooling which could be installed in a random fashion. In Liaison Engineering, when something goes wrong you have to come up with a fix "toute suite"...management expects fast answers even 'though they look down their noses at the "Quick Fix" crowd (Liaison Engineers).

tekochip
User Rank
Platinum
Common Assumption
tekochip   5/4/2012 11:31:43 AM
NO RATINGS
It's a common assumption; people tend to believe that components are bad. Even when you have evidence to the contrary, it's easier to blame a component than a process or a tool. This issue is magnified when you have a marginal design, one that only works when a component is at its nominal rather than one end of the tolerance. I had an issue with a board that would not come out of Reset because the supervisory chip was holding the part in Reset. Technicians, the Production Manager, even Purchasing all believed that the supervisory chip was at fault because they could replace the chip and the circuit would come to life. A quick look at the spec. sheet showed that the pull-up resistor used for the supervisory chip was far too weak. Even after demonstrating that components once removed as failed were now operating properly, they refused to believe that the problem was not a faulty component, after all, the circuit had worked through two years of production without issue. I guess the cure would have been telling them that the pull-up resistor was a faulty component and needed to be replaced.


naperlou
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Check and Double Check ?
naperlou   5/4/2012 10:41:16 AM
NO RATINGS
John, as Gelnn said, this is a good example of not making assumptions.  Your predecessors all assumed that the test harness was fine.  That is often where there is a problem.  Again, check the whole chain starting from where the failure occured.

naperlou
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Check and Double Check ?
naperlou   5/4/2012 10:26:03 AM
NO RATINGS
John, as Gelnn said, this is a good example of not making assumptions.  Your predecessors all assumed that the test harness was fine.  That is often where there is a problem.  Again, check the whole chain starting from where the failure occured.

naperlou
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Check and Double Check ?
naperlou   5/4/2012 10:26:03 AM
NO RATINGS
John, as Gelnn said, this is a good example of not making assumptions.  Your predecessors all assumed that the test harness was fine.  That is often where there is a problem.  Again, check the whole chain starting from where the failure occured.

GlennA
User Rank
Gold
Check and Double Check ?
GlennA   5/4/2012 8:51:11 AM
NO RATINGS
It is interesting that none of your predecessors seemed to have taken the time to check to see if the rejected batteries were actually rejects.  There is an old saw about 'assuming'.  The problem is not 'assuming'.  The problem is not recognizing what assumptions you are making, and then not reviewing those assumptions to see if they are valid.

<<  <  Page 3/3


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
A middle school team from Rochester, Mich., has again nabbed the grand prize in the annual international Future City Competition, which drew students from 37 regions of the United States, as well as from England and China.
The actor captured imaginations and inspired scientists and engineers all over the world in his role as Star Trek's Mr. Spock.
You know you're an engineer if you chuckle whenever anyone says "centrifugal force," or you find yourself at the airport studying the baggage handling equipment.
The word “smart” is becoming the dumbest word around. It has been applied to almost every device and system in our homes. In addition to smartphones and smart meters, we now hear about smart clothing and smart shoes, smart lights, smart homes, smart buildings, and every trendy city today has its smart city project. Just because it has a computer inside and is connected to the Web, does not mean it is smart.
Are you being paid enough? Do you want a better job? According to a recent survey Manpower released just before Engineers Week, employers and engineers don't see eye-to-eye about the state of US engineers' skills and experience.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
2/25/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
12/10/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
11/19/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Mar 9 - 13, Implementing Motor Control Designs with MCUs and FPGAs: An Introduction and Update
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  67


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service