The simple fix would have been to change the material and use a plastic that was a bit conductive. ESD-dissipative plastics Are a good fix for the static build up problem. Even though they are not good enough for shielding against interference or EMI radiation, they can reduce the static buildup. Of course not all molders are able to provide this material.
Notarboca, you are right. I think if we are listening to the comments and blogs, we can avoid most of design flaws and debugging issues up to an extent. Most of the designs may be theoretically correct, but may not work in practical. This may be due to some ignorance, unseen mistakes or sometimes by complication from components.
I would liked to have seen the expressions on the faces of his colleagues when the author brought it back to life by breathing on it. If ever there was a story that deserved the "Sherlock Ohms" designation, this one is it.
The Van de Graaff generator phenomenon is a well-known problem in belt-driven apparatus with no ground connections to the pulleys or to some object near the belt, and in paper-feed or similar mechanisms. These motors, however, didn't accumulate charge while running. Once discharged, they showed no further symptoms. It was during assembly that the charge was introduced. It might have happened as parts were removed from their stockroom packaging (the shutter wheel in particular), or handed by someone in Assembly with static-prone clothing.
Sherlock, quiet sometimes back (1998) I had designed similar BLDC motor using hall-effect sensors. There also we had used a photo voltaic transistor for smooth rotating of the motor, but initially it seems that the motor is rotating for a moment then slow down and then rotates. I mean a regular slowdown in between the rotation. Later we identified that at certain instances, the amplitude of the sensor output is not enough for driving the motor. So what we had done is, just injected an external pulse at regular intervals using a timer chip for making the signal strength constant and hence a continuous rotation.
Robots that walk have come a long way from simple barebones walking machines or pairs of legs without an upper body and head. Much of the research these days focuses on making more humanoid robots. But they are not all created equal.
The IEEE Computer Society has named the top 10 trends for 2014. You can expect the convergence of cloud computing and mobile devices, advances in health care data and devices, as well as privacy issues in social media to make the headlines. And 3D printing came out of nowhere to make a big splash.
For industrial control applications, or even a simple assembly line, that machine can go almost 24/7 without a break. But what happens when the task is a little more complex? That’s where the “smart” machine would come in. The smart machine is one that has some simple (or complex in some cases) processing capability to be able to adapt to changing conditions. Such machines are suited for a host of applications, including automotive, aerospace, defense, medical, computers and electronics, telecommunications, consumer goods, and so on. This discussion will examine what’s possible with smart machines, and what tradeoffs need to be made to implement such a solution.