I think the fact that hybrid owners aren't ponying up when they're back in the car market for another hybrid vehicle has to speak volumes. Unless the data shows they're ponying up for another type of alternative vehicle like a pure EV, I don't know how you can interpret the findings any other way but to say the technology is losing ground. We all know it's much easier to sell something to someone who has already purchased it once or bought into the overall value proposition. I find these findings pretty disheartening.
Charles, you are right, those who have hybrid cars, won't prefer it again. The initial cost for hybrid cars are more when compare with stand alone fuel vehicles. I had a hybrid car and I feel that, when am switching out of gasoline, the engine power and pulling are comes down. I mean the engine is not outputting 100% of its performance. This is a disappointing factor for those who love crazy driving.
I have had my hybrid for just over a year, and when the time comes, I may not buy another. But it's not because I am not happy with it. The Chrysler Aspen Two Mode Hemi Hybrid was only produced for about 1/2 of the 2009 model year. When it comes time to replace it, I don't know if I will be able to find another hybrid rated to tow - the Aspen is rated to tow 6000 lbs. I looked at the Ford Escape and Toyota Highlander hybrids and their spec's were lacklustre when compared to the Aspen. When (if ?) the SUV and truck market opens up to the idea of hybrids, there might be another Chrysler Aspen. I think Dodge has a truck package that is similar to a hybrid, but I think the selling point was the truck with a generator package for remote construction sites.
Beth, another disturbing statistic is the market penetration rate. It is declining. It is also very small.
I looked at hybrids recently. One of the ones I saw had a break even period of at least 2 years. That seemed fairly good since I would keep a car for much longer than that. On the other hand, I think that was optomistic. So, considering the points made in the article, it seems that gasoline vehicles will catch up to hybrids in total cost of ownership (TCO) before long. In many technology businesses TCO is an important selling point. In the consumer field this is becoming important as well.
Interesting statistics in this article, Chuck. I guess the big question is whether the hybrid owners who chose not to continue with a hybrid went on to buy an EV. It could be that those devoted enough to get a hybrid would be even more interested in an EV now that there are more choices in the EV world.
Good article which brought out some relevent points on hybrid perception vs. reality. I was mildly surprised that the data didn't show a stronger loyalty from those who claim to be very concerned with the environment. Also, I was expecting gas prices to impact hybrid segment loyalty more. I supposed there will be a critical threshold that gasoline prices reach where this trend will start to reverse itself.
The question I have after reading the article (and maybe I just didn't see it) is whether the Hybrid owners are in the market to REPLACE their hybrid, or to get a second car. It's a bit soon in the non-Prius Hybrid market to talk about replacements, so I'd have to assume not.
If I'm replacing my Hybrid (a 2010) I'd probably buy another. My Hybrid mid-size get's better mileage and performance (yes, I want both) than the compact cars I test drove at the time of my original purchase.
If I'm replacing my 25 year old Jeep (which needs to haul and tow), I'd look at the Hybrid SUV's and trucks, but chances are I wouldn't get a Hybrid.
A new service lets engineers and orthopedic surgeons design and 3D print highly accurate, patient-specific, orthopedic medical implants made of metal -- without owning a 3D printer. Using free, downloadable software, users can import ASCII and binary .STL files, design the implant, and send an encrypted design file to a third-party manufacturer.
For industrial control applications, or even a simple assembly line, that machine can go almost 24/7 without a break. But what happens when the task is a little more complex? That’s where the “smart” machine would come in. The smart machine is one that has some simple (or complex in some cases) processing capability to be able to adapt to changing conditions. Such machines are suited for a host of applications, including automotive, aerospace, defense, medical, computers and electronics, telecommunications, consumer goods, and so on. This discussion will examine what’s possible with smart machines, and what tradeoffs need to be made to implement such a solution.