HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
REGISTER   |   LOGIN   |   HELP
<<  <  Page 2/4  >  >>
Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Good approach
Rob Spiegel   4/23/2012 2:31:48 PM
NO RATINGS
Getting students hooked on the software is a clever long-term marketing strategy. I remember Apple flooding schools with Apple computers in the mid-1980s -- supported by Ted Kennedy. Millions of kids came out of public schools with a bias toward Apple.

Beth Stackpole
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Good approach
Beth Stackpole   4/23/2012 7:27:50 AM
NO RATINGS
@DavePalmer: I would have to agree with Dave in terms of some of the discipline choices being tied to cultural issues.

I think industry is desperately trying to shift that focus by putting a huge emphasis on promoting STEM careers to women these days. I recently had the opportunity to sit in on a curriculum briefing for new parents at our high school (my son is heading into 9th grade) and there is a whole new track on technology and science courses, one of which is specifically aimed at girls and in fact, is not open to any boys. Also, many of these student competitons are aimed squarely at women. I attended a CAD vendor's briefing last year and they had a professor at MIT come up and talk specifically about a rigorous summer program offered to girls in middle and high school as a means of promoting an orientation in STEM education.

Beth Stackpole
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Good approach
Beth Stackpole   4/23/2012 7:21:46 AM
NO RATINGS
Almost all engineering programs require learning CAD and simulation applications as part of the curriculum--in fact, most of the CAD/CAE/PLM vendors are heavy donators of their software licenses to schools and sponsors of these types of competitions. This is all in the hopes that these students who are trained on their systems will graduate and fast become engineers (with buying muscle) who are trained on their software, therefore prefer their offerings to competitors. It's a market development strategy, to be sure.

gsmith120
User Rank
Platinum
Re: More government funding for educating future engineers?
gsmith120   4/22/2012 3:46:06 PM
NO RATINGS
It is a sad truth that more parents need to be parents and we should place more value on education and less on sports, athletics and being a tv show star.

 

gsmith120
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Good approach
gsmith120   4/22/2012 3:41:06 PM
NO RATINGS
I have almost 20 years of electrical engineering experience which includes design, project and technical lead so when I recently had the opportunity to teach an engineering course at a university I was so excited.  I did notice a lack in teaching students real world stuffs such as simple ESD or reading and understanding datasheets.  So I try to design my class assignments and projects to mimic real world situations.

Jack Rupert, PE
User Rank
Platinum
Re: More government funding for educating future engineers?
Jack Rupert, PE   4/22/2012 2:59:36 PM
I agree, Warren, that getting the government out of the way would certainly be the best solution and letting private industry take the lead is the better option.  There are a number of companies in the area where I live (including the one I work at) that sponsor various teams and competitions.  Not only are they helping train the next generation, they are building good-will in the community.

warren@fourward.com
User Rank
Platinum
More government funding for educating future engineers?
warren@fourward.com   4/20/2012 5:37:06 PM
NO RATINGS
Are you talking about giving money to the same people that graduate students that can't read, write, or count?  I don't see this public school black hole funding trough helping anybody.  I think it is up to families and industry, not the government.  Every time they try to "help" it hurts the kids and the process.

No. The solution doesn't lie in the government in any way.  Get the government out of the way so business can grow.  Once the demand is there and the wages good, the kids will follow the money.  Always have.  Always will.  Remember it was the government who shipped our jobs overseas to begin with after hundreds of years keeping it at home.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Good approach
Charles Murray   4/18/2012 7:16:07 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree, bobjengr. Good professors, especially those with a wealth of professional experience, can make potentially mundane classes into inspiring ones. It's really too bad that many university engineering programs have so few of those teachers.

Dave Palmer
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Good approach
Dave Palmer   4/18/2012 6:25:01 PM
NO RATINGS
@ChasChas: I think it's very unlikely that women are deterred from becoming engineers because of an aversion to logical thinking; after all, about half of math majors are women. (I also don't think it's the case that chemical engineering requires any less logical thinking than mechanical engineering).  I think the issues have more to do with the culture in the various engineering professions.  The mechanical engineering culture in particular remains a very male-dominated culture.

ChasChas
User Rank
Gold
Re: Good approach
ChasChas   4/18/2012 12:50:00 PM
NO RATINGS
 

I noticed that too, Dave. Women engineers tend to favor engineering disciplines that require more rote memory than those disciplines that depend more on strong logic. 



 

<<  <  Page 2/4  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Lumus and eyeSight have partnered to create consumer-grade devices that offer all the prime functions of smart glasses without the bulk.
VisLab joins the autonomous car effort with the DEEVA prototype.
NASA and Boeing developed a huge, carbon composite cryogenic fuel tank for deep space missions, and started testing it last month. The 18-ft cryotank will enable heavy-lift launch vehicles to send both humans and robots into deep space.
Focus on Fundamentals -- a new Design News webinar series -- kicks off April 29 with How to Select Drives for Robotics Applications. Don't miss it!
Research and other advancements in the realms of robotics, diagnostic and treatment devices, nanotechnology, and medical implants may one day make humans superior versions of their natural selves.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
3/27/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York / 7:00 p.m. London
2/27/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York / 7:00 p.m. London
12/18/2013 Available On Demand
11/20/2013 Available On Demand
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Apr 21 - 25, Creating & Testing Your First RTOS Application Using MQX
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: April 29 - Day 1
Sponsored by maxon precision motors
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service