HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Comments
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
<<  <  Page 3/3
Dave Palmer
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Mastering the art of designing for fatigue
Dave Palmer   4/9/2012 11:40:20 AM
NO RATINGS
@Beth: We try to do the best we can using published data, while at the same time accumulating our own body of test data about the materials we use most often.  This way we don't hold up the development cycle waiting for test results; we just constantly fill in the gaps in our knowledge.  I suspect that this is what a lot of other companies do, too.

We also try to avoid component-level fatigue testing where possible.  For example, if you understand how die-cast 380 aluminum behaves in fatigue (and the effect of casting porosity on the properties), you can apply that knowledge to any die-cast 380 component; you don't have to repeat the test for each part.  But for some components, like crankshafts, component-level testing is a must.

Beth Stackpole
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Mastering the art of designing for fatigue
Beth Stackpole   4/9/2012 11:12:48 AM
NO RATINGS
That extra info will be extremely helpful to the community. Thanks so much for providing it, Dave. Your point about having to do your own testing rather than rely on third-party material stuck me, however. Given that so many companies across industries are dealing with time-to-market pressures and there are so many aspects of a product that need vertification and testing, how do you prioritize what's required for fatigue testing, vs. say what's necessary for structural testing or something else? Can development teams really afford to take the time to do this, but I guess the bigger question is can they afford to not?!!!

Dave Palmer
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Mastering the art of designing for fatigue
Dave Palmer   4/9/2012 11:06:02 AM
NO RATINGS
@Beth: There are a number of CAE tools for fatigue analysis.  I don't have direct experience with any of them, but some I've heard of include fe-safe, MSC Fatigue, and nCode.  I'm sure there are others.  Some companies have their own in-house fatigue codes.

As far as sources for fatigue data, the American Iron and Steel Institute has an excellent, free, on-line database of fatigue data for a wide variety of steels. (Registration is required). Of course, it's important to understand what you're looking at.  Not only do you need to find the data for the correct steel; it also needs to be the correct condition.  I've seen engineers use data for a given steel in the annealed (soft) condition when the actual part is hardened, and vice versa.

A lot of fatigue data is available from ASM International; so much, in fact, that it may sometimes be difficult to find what you want.  We have a copy of their Atlas of Fatigue Curves, but, frustratingly, it almost never seems to have the data I'm looking for.  Right now they have a bargain-basement sale on a fatigue data book for light structural alloys which I might order.

Often, though, it's worthwhile to do your own testing rather than relying on published data.  The main drawback of this is that a solid fatigue testing program can take months to complete.  For example, at 30 Hz -- which is pretty fast for a hydraulic load frame -- a single 20 million cycle test will take over a week, and you need to perform several such tests in order to have statistically valuable data.  The advantage, though, is that you can test the alloys you actually use, in the conditions you actually use them.

Beth Stackpole
User Rank
Blogger
Mastering the art of designing for fatigue
Beth Stackpole   4/9/2012 8:23:52 AM
NO RATINGS
Really great explanation on the basic principles that cause fatigue failures--one which even non-engineers like myself can understand. Beyond the key equations you provided at the end of your piece, are there other sources of information about materials properties or specific design tools (perhaps CAE software) that can help engineers with this design challenge?

<<  <  Page 3/3


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Advertised as the "Most Powerful Tablet Under $100," the Kindle Fire HD 6 was too tempting for the team at iFixit to pass up. Join us to find out if inexpensive means cheap, irreparable, or just down right economical. It's teardown time!
The first photos made with a 3D-printed telescope are here and they're not as fuzzy as you might expect. A team from the University of Sheffield beat NASA to the goal. The photos of the Moon were made with a reflecting telescope that cost the research team 100 to make (about $161 US).
At Medical Design & Manufacturing Midwest, Joe Wascow told Design News how Optimal Design prototyped a machine that captures the wing-beat of a duck.
The increased adoption of wireless technology for mission-critical applications has revved up the global market for dynamic electronic general purpose (GP) test equipment. As the link between cloud networks and devices -- smartphones, tablets, and notebooks -- results in more complex devices under test, the demand for radio frequency test equipment is starting to intensify.
Much of the research on lithium-ion batteries is focused on how to make the batteries charge more quickly and last longer than they currently do, work that would significantly improve the experience of mobile device users, as well EV and hybrid car drivers. Researchers in Singapore have come up with what seems like the best solution so far -- a battery that can recharge itself in mere minutes and has a potential lifespan of 20 years.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
10/7/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
9/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
9/10/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Oct 20 - 24, How to Design & Build an Embedded Web Server: An Embedded TCP/IP Tutorial
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: 10/28-10/30 11:00 AM
Sponsored by Stratasys
Next Class: 10/28-10/30 2:00 PM
Sponsored by Gates Corporation
Next Class: 11/11-11/13 2:00 PM
Sponsored by Littelfuse
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service