This capability will actually allow engineers and others in the product development food chain to tap into what is said about their products (likes, dislikes, requirements, problems, etc) in other social media forums. The idea, according to Dassault, is to capture customer sentiment about the product and the "experience" and then feed that data or intelligence back to those involved in product design so they can consider it in the early stages of development--not after the fact and in reactive mode. Like many cited here, I'm not sure individual engineers will do much or even think much of random "customer sentiment" captured in that fashion. But perhaps having a tool that lets you dial into what customers are thinking/saying might have some impact, especially if the mandate to do so comes from the top.
Due to its targeted focus, this type of social media experience may actually have a greater chance of attracting consistent and meaningful discussions. The best social media sites attract interested, knowledgeable people committed to the topic, which can provide an excellent source of news and discussion. Will be interesting to see how these types of forums develop.
I completely agree with Al, about the two ends of the spectrum in terms of how social media is perceived. I think that most engineers would bucket social media in the "not very useful" or "waste of time" category as of now. This particular Dassault alliance is definitely a bit odd, but is in keeping with the firm's overall strategy to blend its engineering oriented software, which has been its staple, with more consumer-oriented technology with the goal of opening up the product development process from a locked door, engineering club function to more of a mainstream endeavor using 3D data as the universal language.
Excellent article. Social media is still a forum that needs to prove itself to some extent. There's no question that interacting with other users is an effective tool for software users. Support forums certainly demonstrate that the ability to ask questions, or report bugs, is an effective way to gain from the experiences of other users. It will be interesting to see how these kinds of tools evolve in the future and how widespread their use is adopted. Some love social media; others consider it largely a waste of time.
I understand what you'e saying, Naperlou. It was my understanding that the tool was meant to deliver customer feedback such as, this product doesn't work under these condictions -- much like we hear in the Made by Monkeys blog.
What strikes me is the talk about delivering "experiences". People do not buy experiences. They buy products. This talk about experiences is all the rage in the software industry these days. In my experience, when someone starts trying to change the conversation in this way their motivation is that they have not competed well in traditional arena. An example of this is with corporate software that I ran into a few years back. We were talking to a customer and our competitor came in with a pricing scheme that stressed value of the software. They waned to customer to tell the customer what the value of the application was to them. This stalled the deal for everyone, but in the end we prevailed. It had just been a tactic to do just that, stall the deal. For one thing, the customer did not necessarily want to tell the vendors what the applicatiion was worth to them. They needed a product to help them dio thier business. Another thing that comes to mind is that the whole tone is that customers do not have an experience today. That does not make sense.
I am not saying, though, that this software will not bring value. Knowing what customers think and getting good and extensive feedback is a good thing. The reality though, is that this will feed into future versions of the product, not some "experience" that they might have.
I agree, Beth. This is a necessary voice for the design team to hear. In the Made by Monkeys blog, those commenting continually say this information needs to go back to the design team. Of course, there is no mechanism to make that happen. Social media tied to design may create an effective echo chamber.
Good point, Rob. You can tap into social media venues and let the "voice of the customer" rabble on about product requirements, etc., but if engineers aren't ready, willing, and able to listen, it's a moot point. That said, listening to customer requirements has always been a hallmark of effective product design and this is really no different. It's just a different venue for listening and one where experts say customers are much more willing and comfortable to expose their true voice--not in random surveys or focus groups, which have been how companies traditionally get customer feedback.
This is really interesting, Beth. Obviously Dassault is betting (with millions) that social media -- and its resulting audience -- will play an increasingly larger role in design. They are probably right. Like collaboration, though, it will only pay off if the design community is willing to take in the wider feedback.
Engineers at Fuel Cell Energy have found a way to take advantage of a side reaction, unique to their carbonate fuel cell that has nothing to do with energy production, as a potential, cost-effective solution to capturing carbon from fossil fuel power plants.
To get to a trillion sensors in the IoT that we all look forward to, there are many challenges to commercialization that still remain, including interoperability, the lack of standards, and the issue of security, to name a few.
This is part one of an article discussing the University of Washington’s nationally ranked FSAE electric car (eCar) and combustible car (cCar). Stay tuned for part two, tomorrow, which will discuss the four unique PCBs used in both the eCar and cCars.
Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.