HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Walt
User Rank
Gold
Re: What about safety standards?
Walt   4/4/2012 9:24:43 AM
NO RATINGS
As Jim S questioned "...or is a group excercising beaurocratic muscle?"  This is often the case.  Many standards and regulations are born of political or beaurocratic moves rather than the need to make a product or process "better".  The cost can sometimes be stifled innovation and unnecessary costs to designers & manufacturers.  I believe the motive and the true (often hidden) goals are usually worth questioning...

 

Stephen
User Rank
Gold
Re: What about safety standards?
Stephen   4/3/2012 9:43:13 AM
NO RATINGS
So MEMS manufacturers are goingto have to evolve to meet the needs & requirementsvof their customer (the automotive market) if they are going to have continued growth. Such is life in many industries. At least a (hopefully) widely accepted standard gives concrete guidance on where to focus efforts. Doesn't mean it'll be easy, but if it was then everybody'd be doing it.

To quote Jimmy Dugan: "It's supposed to be hard, the hard is what makes it great!" Isn't that why we do what we do, for the challenge of the hard?

Walt
User Rank
Gold
Anticipation of MEMS offering disruptions?
Walt   4/3/2012 9:26:49 AM
NO RATINGS
Does the implementation of this regulation pose a risk of today's MEMS products (accelerometers & gyros in particular) being obsoleted and replaced with "compliant" versions?

Jim S
User Rank
Gold
Question Need for this standard
Jim S   4/3/2012 9:19:43 AM
NO RATINGS
Is there an underlying need for this or is a group excercising beaurocratic muscle. If the mems makers chose not to revamp their internal procedures where would these guys go for parts. I think some of the standardization is losing all real benefit.

Beth Stackpole
User Rank
Blogger
What about safety standards?
Beth Stackpole   4/2/2012 7:26:08 AM
NO RATINGS
You say MEMS makers have to change the way they develop and manufacture if they are to enjoy continued and sustained success selling into the automotive OEM channel. What specifically is the issue around they way they currently manufacture that is at issue? Are there safety concerns, is it related to quality and production? What exactly is the disconnect, and any sense of whether or not the MEMS makers are doing anything to address the issue?



Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
For decades there have been rumors that Microsoft essentially copied DRI's CP/M operating system and sold it to IBM as MS-DOS. In just a few days, all will be revealed.
A San Francisco startup called Otto came out of stealth mode recently and released a dramatic video demonstrating its successful test of a technology for self-driving trucks.
Researchers have found a way to use graphene to cheaply and easily turn dirty water into drinking water.
A new 1-GHz vector signal transceiver promises to offer expanded test capabilities for engineers involved in applications ranging from automotive and aerospace to semiconductors and defense.
Researchers at the Masdar Institute of Science and Technology have devised a new method for designing strong, light cellular structures of re-architected metals and plastics with optimized properties.
More:Blogs|News
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7 | 8 | 9 | 10


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2016 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service