HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
<<  <  Page 3/5  >  >>
jmiller
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Japanese system
jmiller   3/31/2012 11:15:49 AM
NO RATINGS
I agree that it is not just in the car industry.  You can add electronics and now eve n appliances to that list of produccts that are manufactured that way.  At least sort of.  You do have to be aware that there are different Asian countries and I don't think they all have that same level of quality engineering.  Especially, when it comes to the component level.  Some of my largest headaches have come from Asian component suppliers.

Tim
User Rank
Platinum
Japanese system
Tim   3/30/2012 9:47:35 PM
NO RATINGS
It is hard to beat the Japanese system methodology. This philosophy carries over to most items made in Japan not just cars. It allows for some additional tolerance with individual parts as long as the system works.

William K.
User Rank
Platinum
Are managers hurting engineering?
William K.   3/30/2012 8:20:30 PM
NO RATINGS
The assertion about designing for a three year product life is fairly accurate, at least it was for Chrysler while I was there. For starters, the top managers did seem to be accounting types, not engineers. But one indicator oof the problem was the reality that while the managers drove assigned cars so that, at least in theory, they could see any problems, all of those cars were inspected and serviced by mechanics EVERY DAY! The explanation that I got from our department manager was that nobody ever wanted thier part to be noticed as a problem by the upper management. I don't know what would have happened if there had been a problem noticed, but it would probably make somebodies career shorter or less rewarding. Now with that kind of culture and mindset, the policy makers never ever saw any reason to push for any changes. 

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Its not just the Auto Execs killing Engineering
Charles Murray   3/30/2012 7:26:38 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree with you, JimT. It seems that American companies are too often at the mercy of stockholders, causing CEOs to get fired frequently and causing executives to seek short term profits over long-term goals. 

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: ADDING my 2 cents...
Charles Murray   3/30/2012 7:23:55 PM
NO RATINGS
For what it's worth, Old Curmudgeon, Mercedes Benz and BMW both do poorly in Consumer Reports' reliability ratings, year after year.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Failed free market
Rob Spiegel   3/30/2012 4:18:32 PM
NO RATINGS
Good points, Jeff. I think we're seeing that optimism now in the gasoline market. At-the-pump gas prices have gone up about 20 percent in the last coule months, while the cost of oil is only up about 6 or 7 percent. Right now a barrel of oil is only $103, while gas is pushing $4.00. Two or three months ago, gas was about $2.75 while oil was about $98.

jeffbiss
User Rank
Gold
Re: Failed free market
jeffbiss   3/30/2012 2:01:32 PM
NO RATINGS
One of the tenets of free market theory is that the freer the market, the more accurate the price. The problem is that free markets aren't controlled by the assumptions made by economists and so greed overpowers the mechanism that is supposed to provide negative feedback required to control prices. Therefore, greed and excessive optimism takes over and prices rise until collapse, which directly refutes free market theory.

Now that is in no way implying that a market must be heavily regulated, only to the point that it provides the required negative feedback to control what Greenspan defined as irrational exuberance. So, we need rational, good sense regulation in every market.

In line with the auto market, regulating that safety and efficiency be design considerations is good. Also, forcing manufacturers to correct design flaws is good too. the problem is doing it correctly to not stifle beneficial innovation.

jeffbiss
User Rank
Gold
Re: 42 mpg not as good as >45 mpg
jeffbiss   3/30/2012 1:53:39 PM
NO RATINGS
You couldn't have had a CRX as they were a two person vehicle. I'm sure that engineers can produce a powerplant/vehicle combo that can get far better than what we see now. the problem is the American public. Most people see cheap oil as their birthright and so auto makers are sort of coerced into producing poor mileage vehicles. Sort of because the bigger the vehicle, the greater the profit.

Absalom
User Rank
Gold
Re: Failed free market
Absalom   3/30/2012 1:35:27 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree that we have failed policies in regulating the auto and energy industries but disagree with it being called a failure of the "free market". I call it the failed policies of greedy politicians making backroom deals with greedy industrialists with the "regulations" being used to squeeze out inovative competition.

JimT@Future-Product-Innovations
User Rank
Blogger
Its not just the Auto Execs killing Engineering
JimT@Future-Product-Innovations   3/30/2012 12:56:06 PM
NO RATINGS

One particularly key statement, as the article concludes, is copied and re-pasted here: 

"In contrast, North American companies tend to appease stockholders who want short-term profits -- often at the expense of long-term reliability, he said. As a result, the focus shifts to cost-cutting, instead of to engineering and quality."

This statement applies to a bigger picture than automotive only.  It is the absolutely a myopic American view of the dollar. When, oh when, will the American Corporation ever learn TRUE value-?  The article speaks for itself.  Systems Engineering, for example.

<<  <  Page 3/5  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Lithium-ion battery prices will drop rapidly over the next 10 years, setting the stage for plug-in vehicles to reach 5%-10% of total automotive sales by the mid- to late-2020s, according to a new study.
Two researchers from Cornell University have won a $100,000 grant from NASA to continue work to develop an energy-harvesting robotic eel the space agency aims to use to explore oceans on one of the moons of Jupiter.
Is the factory smarter than it used to be? From recent buzzwords, you’d think we’ve entered a new dimension in industrial plants, where robots run all physical functions wirelessly and humans do little more than program ever more capable robotics. Some of that is actually true, but it’s been true for a while.
The big picture to this hands-on technology curriculum is to illustrate to students that the future of IoT and IoE (Internet of Everything) development can be created in today’s classroom.
A recent Design News-exclusive study proves that engineering professionals are at the very forefront of this push into the future and making direct financial, performance, and value impact on their organizations by being personally involved or final decision-makers on automation solution and component choices.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
5/21/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
5/7/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
6/3/2015 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
6/11/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Jun 8 - 12, Everything You Ever Wanted to Know about Filters
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Course June 2nd-4th:
Sponsored by Proto Labs
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service