HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Beth Stackpole
User Rank
Blogger
The era of consumerization
Beth Stackpole   3/28/2012 6:39:01 AM
NO RATINGS
Very cool development and one that puts Freescale squarely ahead of a trend that I don't see any signs of stopping. With more and more people (overly) dependent on smart phones and tablets for everything related to both work and play, there's no doubt that people are expecting the same ease of use and intuitive user interface in every kind of electronics/appliance/piece of gear they touch. Why settle for less when the touch and gesture interface popularized by Apple is so pervasive. If I can intuitively use my smart phone to access my home security system, why shouldn't I be able to employ the same interface to control industrial automation system or my fridge. I think this trend will go gangbusters over the next year and Freescale's new multicore processor is only going to help.

 

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: The era of consumerization
Charles Murray   3/28/2012 7:51:18 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree, Beth. Freescale, as well as other chip makers moving in the same direction, are on to something important. When you see a company like Cadillac use iPhone capabilities in their touch screens, then you know it must be solidly in the mainstream.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: The era of consumerization
Charles Murray   4/11/2012 8:27:49 PM
NO RATINGS
Great point about the pervasiveness of iPad-type user interfaces, Beth. While I was doing the story, an engineer told me that his four-year-old son recently tried to use his fingers to manipulate a washing machine screen while the family was looking at products at Best Buy. The fact that a four-year-old is already conversant with touch screen technology tells us a lot about that pervasiveness that you mentioned.

Beth Stackpole
User Rank
Blogger
Re: The era of consumerization
Beth Stackpole   4/12/2012 6:24:52 AM
NO RATINGS
@Chuck: A four-year-old's dexterity with gestures and touch screen interaction is pretty incredible, but not surprising. I can't tell you how often I see kids--really small kids--glued to their parent's iPad whether it's on the grocery store check out line, the doctor's waiting room, or even in a restaurant as a source of distraction. These interfaces are ingrained in our kids from the earliest age and they will expect no less when it comes to operating any kind of product that they buy as consumer when they grow up.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: The era of consumerization
Charles Murray   4/12/2012 6:55:51 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree, Beth. And this is why every product -- stove, fridge, washer, dryer, television, etc -- will be using touchscreens in the near future. They'll have to in order to keep up with consumer expectations.

Beth Stackpole
User Rank
Blogger
Re: The era of consumerization
Beth Stackpole   4/13/2012 7:23:45 AM
NO RATINGS
I agree with you, Chuck. Every mainstream product will embrace the touch screen over the next few years. Some of those everyday appliances--dish washers, washers, dryers--are so much easier to use and feel so much more high-tech with those interfaces. But I think sometimes it's overkill. Who needs a coffee pot with too many bells and whistles or a toaster, for that matter. Designers have to apply the new interface technology when and where it makes sense.

 

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: The era of consumerization
Charles Murray   4/13/2012 6:54:13 PM
NO RATINGS
That's one of the aspects of consumer demand I don't understand, Beth. Apparently, consumers demand more bells and whistles, and the devices invariably get harder to use. Are there no consumers left who want simplicity?  I don't want to waste my time figuring out how to use all six buttons on my wristwatch (so I can display Greenwich Mean Time just in case I need it) and I'm always surprised that there apparently aren't more consumers who feel the same way.

Beth Stackpole
User Rank
Blogger
Re: The era of consumerization
Beth Stackpole   4/16/2012 7:12:15 AM
NO RATINGS
I think there are plenty of customers that share your sentiments. I definitely do. I think the HMIs done right will hand you the bells and whistles, but in a way that is dummy proof--that even the computing uninitated can figure out on their own. At the risk of being called an Apple zealot here, the iPhone/iPad interface is just like that. Even if you're not familar with the commands or have ever pursued high-level functionality, it's pretty simple to play around and find yourself doing something you never thought you would be able to do before. That's how appliances should function. You should not have to open the manual to figure out how to turn on the coffee or set the timer. If you have to, the interface is a failure, in my book.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: The era of consumerization
Charles Murray   4/25/2012 6:32:19 PM
NO RATINGS
Your point about not having to open the manual goes right to the heart of Cadillac's effort to build a better touch screen. If you recall, they travelled with consumers (in one case joining them on vacation) to find out how people learn about their devices. Their discovery: Most consumers don't want to use their manuals. Surprise!

tekochip
User Rank
Platinum
Re: The era of consumerization
tekochip   4/25/2012 9:45:09 PM
NO RATINGS
Ahh yes, remember the dot com days when manufacturers were scrambling to web enable toasters, coffee pots, alarm clocks, and every appliance you can think of?  This too shall pass.  Certainly, a touch screen can be a powerful interface, but my toothbrush probably won't need one.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Task partitioning & interfaces
Ann R. Thryft   3/28/2012 12:19:56 PM
NO RATINGS

Interesting partitioning of tasks between the two processors, and one that makes a lot of sense. The HMI/GUI continues to get more complicated as a greater proportion of electronics users are consumers, and a smaller proportion are engineers, as the iPhonization of industrial applications continues. In the ancient old days of much lousier, less intuitive UIs we had to put up with quite a lot of confusing interactions. OTOH, some people (my husband included) find the command line interface a much more powerful way to interact with the machine. Well, yes, if you actually need to program the thing. Personally, I'd prefer a one-way non-vocal Siri: I talk, it listens, figures out what I want, and does it, with no talking back. Meanwhile I'm on to the next thought and task.


Craig
User Rank
Iron
Re: Task partitioning & interfaces
Craig   3/29/2012 1:25:35 PM
NO RATINGS
Oh that's classic Ann!!  "...with no talking back."  I don't want my 'hardware' to talk to me either!  We each want a different UI according to what we like.  And I like all my (non-audio) hardware silent and obedient!  "STOP that BEEPing!!"  I find a train of thought to be very fragile and noise is distracting.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Task partitioning & interfaces
Ann R. Thryft   3/30/2012 12:37:17 PM
NO RATINGS

Thanks, Craig. Glad you liked my humor and that someone else knows what I mean. "Silent and obedient"--yes! Sometimes my train of thought is fragile, and sometimes it's so fast that I hate wasting time interacting through such a slo-o-o-w medium as two-way full-duplex speech, or even just listening to a bunch of beeps. Besides, it's just a machine, a tool. I prefer to have conversations with actual living beings. 

And you're right, there are several different preferences for UIs. So why do we get stuck with just one on a given machine?


Mydesign
User Rank
Platinum
Hybrid Chips
Mydesign   3/29/2012 3:05:08 AM
NO RATINGS
1 saves
Charles, it seems that integration of two tasks in a chip, where real-time applications and domain specific applications. I think such hybrid model chips have to develop further, so that they are more compactable to the board and efforts can be minimize.

IQ Process Control
User Rank
Iron
Dual Core
IQ Process Control   3/29/2012 9:33:01 AM
NO RATINGS
This sounds like a much better approach than conventional methods where HMI's either use one mutitasking processor for communication, screen updates and background processing or two seporate processors, one being used for communications alone. This all in one approach is bound to be much more effiecent.

ChasChas
User Rank
Platinum
Non-critical timing
ChasChas   3/29/2012 10:31:58 AM
NO RATINGS
 

The way I see it. the tasks are separated so the coordination between the chips are non-critical. Is this correct?

 

apresher
User Rank
Blogger
Industrial HMIs
apresher   3/29/2012 2:53:56 PM
NO RATINGS
Chuck, Excellent article.  There's no question but that industrial HMIs will be providing all types of additional computing options from animations and video-based instruction manuals and other applications.  As PCs in particular continue to provide additional processing power, and operating systems go to the next level, the Industrial HMI becomes the portal to the machine more and more.  Thanks.

apresher
User Rank
Blogger
Industrial HMIs
apresher   3/29/2012 4:30:34 PM
NO RATINGS
One other question.  A key trend for industrial factory HMIs is that they are often also serving as the main controller for the machine.  Most are PC based architectures increasingly using Windows because of the flexibility.  Does this approach also compete effectively with that approach?  Can envision an appliance or other products might have entirely different HMI needs.



Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Some humanoid walking robots are also good at running, balancing, and coordinated movements in group settings. Several of our sports robots have won regional or worldwide acclaim in the RoboCup soccer World Cup, or FIRST Robotics competitions. Others include the world's first hockey-playing robot and a trash-talking Scrabble player.
Sherlock Ohms highlights stories told by engineers who have used their deductive reasoning and technical prowess to troubleshoot and solve the most perplexing engineering mysteries.
Melissa Cavanagh of 3DP Unlimited talked to Design News about the company’s large format 3D printer, during Medical Design and Manufacturing Midwest.
The DDV-IP is a two-wheeled self-balancing robot that can deliver cold beverages to thirsty folks on hot summer days. A wireless RF remote enables manual control of the device beyond the act of self-balancing. All of the features of the DDV-IP result in an effective delivery vehicle while providing entertainment to the user.
Eric Doster of iFixit talks about the most surprising aspect of the Microsoft Surface Pro 3 teardown. In a presentation at Medical Design & Manufacturing Midwest, iFixit gave the Surface Pro 3 a score of one (out of a possible 10) for repairability.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
10/7/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
9/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
9/10/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Oct 20 - 24, How to Design & Build an Embedded Web Server: An Embedded TCP/IP Tutorial
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: 10/28-10/30 11:00 AM
Sponsored by Stratasys
Next Class: 10/28-10/30 2:00 PM
Sponsored by Gates Corporation
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service