Ugh! Seems like a classic case of shortsighted design thinking and cutting corners. We had a number of ceiling fans in our former house and we pretty much universally had problems with all at some point in time with the various settings being off kilter. That said, the fans were not the same model and not even from the same manufacturer. With one, the settings for low, medium, and high speed were actually backwards. It wasn't anything that was dangerous or that we even took time (and expense) to fix. The bother was we had to create kludgy workarounds just to keep them going.
Classic case of solely using Analytical Problem Solving with no regard to Systems Engineering. In isolation, I'm sure the fan, the louvers, and the switch were perfectly compatible on paper and during assembly. But actually measuring the performance of the system as it would be used in the field was not addressed. To have it fail on first use is pretty silly. Even with modest Systems testing it should have been easily discovered in the lab. I'll definitely be using this story as an example in my Systems Analysis course...
I have a fan that works exactly like this. I was very surprised at first, but silly me, I figured there must be some logical reason it was designed that way. What once seemed over my head was probably just a dumb design.
I feel blessed to have two small, inexpensive ceiling fans with globe lights that have worked nearly perfectly for 12 years--they are going constantly in winter and summer--and many years before I inherited them when I bought the house. They are small, painted white (which does not fit the rest of the decor) and I at first considered replacing them but never got around to it. Now I'm afraid to. Everyone I know with great big more expensive ceiling fans by well-known national brands complains about some fault or other. The only problem we have is that the one whose light is switched on and off most tends to occasionally wobble slightly and vibrate, making a very annoying noise. I fixed that by inserting a large, thick rubber band around the neck of the globe which makes a thin cushion, before it's inserted into the housing and screws screwed in to secure it. I change it every 4 months or so.
William, your reference to the system engineering angle is well noted. What would your suggestions be to your students, given this example, in terms of helping avoid what looks to be an all-too common scenario?
@Beth -- By far, I have found the Number One important concept in System Engineering is to be mindful of the Environment... Not the environment as in Environmentalism, like clean air and water, but the System Environment. There are several views on design optimization:
1) Use the Best Ingredients (Input)
2) Use the Best Practices (Process)
3) Insure the Best Quality (Output)
All three of these are great, but taken separately, or even as a group, if the list does not include
4) Be mindful of the effects of things external to the system (Environment)
then we get things like the inflow of house air causing a current which entrains the pull cord which subsequently gets caught in the blades.
Testing a finished or prototype product in its actual usage Environment should identify a host of potential problems.
This comment is already too long, but it brings to mind the valuable lesson from Langley vs. the Wright Brothers. On paper, Sam Langley was an excellent engineer that could design the best powered flight machine using the best components, the best technology, and the most powerful engines. It took the Wright Brothers and their wind tunnels to simulate the flowing air environment of thousands of wings, kites, and control systems before they started testing on the beach -- a place that provided wind and a soft landing for anticipated crashes. Langley launched his machines from an aircraft carrier in the Potomac River... and continuously fished them out from the bottom.
I'm chuckling at the number of people who are confusing a ceiling fan with a whole house atic fan... The two are no where close to each other than the word FAN.
I do have to admit, I've never seen a whole house fan with a pull cord, let alone 3 speeds. Every one I've ever seen was wired down to a wall switch with a 30 minute mechanical timer with a hold position.
Thinking about putting one of these in myself actually, for the exact same reason, they move a ton of air, probably in the 10-20,000 CFM range.
Since I happen to have the technology available, I was planning on using a small 230v VFD and running it variable speed vs. on/off or 3 step control.
The rationale for the first position of a 3 position switch or pull of chain is that it gets the motor running at maximum torque. As the motor ages, this is needed. Starting the motor in the slowest position, lowest torque, may stall it and cause higher currents,etc. So starting at high speed is sensible and the user can then pull twice or turn switch to low position after the fan gets moving.
I'm willing to bet that the probelm is that many of these consumer items are never tested in their environment. I'm sure that the goal was to produce a fan that would sell and thus make money. In fact, I've had experience with products designed for specialized markets that were poorly tested prior to release and thus design flaws weren't discovered until they were in the field, when real people used them for real, and costs to correct the flaws is extremely high compared to the design phase.
I'm sure that the pull chain attic fan was a regular ceiling fan motor mounted in a frame for installation between joists. It was NOT what you describe because it would have cost more if done correctly.
Engineers at Fuel Cell Energy have found a way to take advantage of a side reaction, unique to their carbonate fuel cell that has nothing to do with energy production, as a potential, cost-effective solution to capturing carbon from fossil fuel power plants.
To get to a trillion sensors in the IoT that we all look forward to, there are many challenges to commercialization that still remain, including interoperability, the lack of standards, and the issue of security, to name a few.
This is part one of an article discussing the University of Washington’s nationally ranked FSAE electric car (eCar) and combustible car (cCar). Stay tuned for part two, tomorrow, which will discuss the four unique PCBs used in both the eCar and cCars.
Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.