Very good engineering, and an interesting approach to implementing the solution. Being able to produce right answers consistently certainly does aid an engineers career, although some acounting types will still be upset that the direct benefits can't be shown as production.
Providing right answers is one of the things that engineers are supposed to be doing and it is what makes them both valuable and unique assets. It would be good if some management types realized that we are not all interchangeable.
I have never been in a paper mill, but I can only imagine that it is a harsh manufacturing environment. The combination of wood pulp, water, and pressure is bound to cause large "hairballs" somewhere in the facility. It was good to see that the investigation was started looking to people for their opinions on what might be causing the issue. Person to person communication is often a forgotten part of engineering.
The losses incurred were real, but it's a complicated situation. I recall that making paper was (except for some premium grades) a very low margin affair, so the mills were graded primarily on tons out the door - do anything to keep the machines running. And paper mills are marvelously complex systems, which means an enormous number of possibile root causes to investigate. Often that meant the overwhelmed operations guys would only have time to do the simplest things.
That opened up the ecosystem for people like me to come in and help out. I can't help thinking about all the other mills that must have had the same problems that I was solving, but there didn't seem to be an effective way to spread the word.
If they had fixed that 'broken window' in the first year, they would have saved about $6M. A little educated guesswork tells me that was just over 20 years ago, making your sleuthing worth more than Six Mil to them. Don't play the lottery, folks; hire an engineer! :-)
Geoff, it seems that you are good service engineer too. Basically most of the problems are occurs due to small similar negligence's. if we know the exact working principle and functionality of the machine, it's not that much complicated to rectify the problems. Like design, it's also a generic skill.
Thanks, Geoff, for this story on the headbox hairballs. The headline definitely caught my attention, and might spawn other hairball stories. It's amazing how many long terms engineering problems (this one a pest for 20 years) are ultimately solved by careful research, analysis and followthrough. Thanks again.
Truchard will be presented the award at the 2014 Golden Mousetrap Awards ceremony during the co-located events Pacific Design & Manufacturing, MD&M West, WestPack, PLASTEC West, Electronics West, ATX West, and AeroCon.
In a bid to boost the viability of lithium-based electric car batteries, a team at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory has developed a chemistry that could possibly double an EV’s driving range while cutting its battery cost in half.
For industrial control applications, or even a simple assembly line, that machine can go almost 24/7 without a break. But what happens when the task is a little more complex? That’s where the “smart” machine would come in. The smart machine is one that has some simple (or complex in some cases) processing capability to be able to adapt to changing conditions. Such machines are suited for a host of applications, including automotive, aerospace, defense, medical, computers and electronics, telecommunications, consumer goods, and so on. This discussion will examine what’s possible with smart machines, and what tradeoffs need to be made to implement such a solution.