HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
<<  <  Page 3/3
Alexander Wolfe
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Added Art
Alexander Wolfe   2/28/2012 4:16:21 PM
NO RATINGS
Chas makes a great point re aircraft being design largely for efficiency rather than looks. It'd be interesting to see what would happen if Ford and GM did concept cars stemming from a similar engineering imperative. There is actually something like this in the racing world. I couldn't find it on Google, but I recall at the car shows around five years ago, they were exhibiting a standardized chassis with roll cage etc, into which anyone could pop their own engine and drive train.

ChasChas
User Rank
Platinum
Added Art
ChasChas   2/28/2012 12:40:05 PM
NO RATINGS
Autos are getting a little more interesting now. For years, most changes were in the looks - I call it the "added art".

Compare auto design with manufacturing machines and aircraft. Added art is almost none existent in the latter. The beauty is in the funtionality with minimum fuss and maximum efficiency.

Like I say, cars are getting interesting again - not just adding a useless fin or egging out a headlight to look like some action hero's weapon.

 

 

 

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: New shapes
Rob Spiegel   2/28/2012 11:20:59 AM
NO RATINGS
That makes sense, Chuck. I wonder if that will change as we now seem to be entering a period of healthy automaker profits. Or, it could be that cost-cutting measures will become a fixed position. Of course, that could change if one company broke out with something new and was rewarded with increased sales.

naperlou
User Rank
Blogger
Re: New shapes
naperlou   2/28/2012 9:53:07 AM
NO RATINGS
Frankly, chuck, I think Detroit would have done well to produce some of their previous, wilder concept cars.  They got a little too stodgy.

As for hybrids, I find it somewhat less than exciting.  There are shops that will install a hybrid drive train in an existing car.  It is pricey, but if you have the money and desire, it can be done.  So, while it is an interesting design challenge, it is not "exciting" technology.  The trick is to make them efficient and inexpensive.  That is where they will have an impact.  For cars, the trick is to come out, continuously, with incremental improvements.  A 10% improvement in effeciency across the board is a huge thing.  In the US, I think about 15M to 20M cars are sold each year.  If I have my figures right, that is on the order of 10% of the vehicle fleet.  So, each 10% increase in effeciency is 1% overall.  While there is some room for small cars like the Smart Car, the appeal there is limited.  It is cute, though.  I drove one once at Beaulieu, in the UK.  It was fun, but I was not convinced (my car back then was an Alfa Romeo). 

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: New shapes
Charles Murray   2/27/2012 7:34:33 PM
NO RATINGS
Rob: I believe the issue with concept cars today is lack of money. Designers are being pushed to create concept cars that hint, maybe not so subtly, at upcoming production vehicles. The era of wildness, when designers could really let it out, is mostly back in the rear-view mirror. Honda's Accord concepts, for example, will actually be coming out later this year as production vehicles.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
New shapes
Rob Spiegel   2/27/2012 12:36:53 PM
NO RATINGS
Nice slide show, Chuck. I was struck by a couple new designs -- the Chrysler 700 C is certainly a new look for the minivan, and the Volkswagon Bug Roadster is also an interesting look. But I agree with Alex, much of the advances are under the hood.

Alexander Wolfe
User Rank
Blogger
Design conservatism?
Alexander Wolfe   2/27/2012 11:43:47 AM
NO RATINGS
What struck me most about this crop of concept cars is the generally conservative approach to design. My take is that when tech isn't advancing (like say 20 years ago), the designers really go to town on external body shell. These days, the progress is under the hood, in the power train etc. So perhaps that's why these concept cars look so much more like real production cars -- and in fact some of the will be soon; at least one in 2013.

<<  <  Page 3/3


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
A study by the Swiss government determined the type of human errors that lead to engineering disasters and ranked those errors by percentage.
General Motorsí growing commitment to electric cars took a new turn last week, as the giant automaker said it would use EV batteries in the future to help boost its use of renewable energy.
A fabric designer and chemical engineer have teamed up to design fabric woven with solar panels for the future of wearable, autonomously powered technology.
A new linear encoder will offer measurement resolution of about 31 picometers -- less than the diameter of an atom -- when it hits the market in prototype form later this year.
Apple made some controversial decisions with its new iPhone 7 models, so what did they do with the extra space? The latest teardown from iFixit digs under the hood of Apple's new sensor-heavy phone.
More:Blogs|News
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Sep 12 - 16, Analytics for the IoT: A Deep Dive into Algorithms
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7 | 8 | 9 | 10


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Course June 28-30:
Sponsored by Stratasys
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2016 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service