Jim, I do remember our discussion of the early SLAs. The variety of materials used now in AM is quite wide, though, depending on the process and the app combined. It sounds like in this case an increase in the material's ability to transmit light might make it less dense, i.e., translucent. And perhaps that makes it process faster. But that's just a guess. Let's hope the company can tell us more.
Ann & Beth, I was wondering the same thing ... Ann, you and I had discussed the earliest SLA's (circa 1988) in another article recently.As I recall, those early polymers emerged from the liquid vat only partially solidified, then required a period of time in a UV oven, where a dense bank of fluorescent lights in a hooded chamber finalized the hardening process so the prototypes could be handled.Wondering now, if the light transmissivity (sp-?) hardening characteristic of those old polymers is common to this translucent characteristic of this modern material-?
To me, it makes sense that a business using this printing technology for prototyping would want speed first. I would assume that most of the quick-turnaround prototypers mostly want to know how a part fits into a larger assembly
Thanks, Beth, I hope they can give more detail. It's not an obvious connection. Unless I'm missing something, I think what would be more interesting is what was done to the material to make it fuse quicker, but the fact that it's less opaque is secondary.
I hear you in terms of making the connection, Ann. The company spokesperson was scant on details when I asked. Something about the opaqueness adding to the ability to fuse the materials quicker is really the only takeaway I was able to glean. I will reach out to 3D Systems and see I can get them to weigh in a bit more on the technical explanation.
Truchard will be presented the award at the 2014 Golden Mousetrap Awards ceremony during the co-located events Pacific Design & Manufacturing, MD&M West, WestPack, PLASTEC West, Electronics West, ATX West, and AeroCon.
In a bid to boost the viability of lithium-based electric car batteries, a team at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory has developed a chemistry that could possibly double an EV’s driving range while cutting its battery cost in half.
For industrial control applications, or even a simple assembly line, that machine can go almost 24/7 without a break. But what happens when the task is a little more complex? That’s where the “smart” machine would come in. The smart machine is one that has some simple (or complex in some cases) processing capability to be able to adapt to changing conditions. Such machines are suited for a host of applications, including automotive, aerospace, defense, medical, computers and electronics, telecommunications, consumer goods, and so on. This discussion will examine what’s possible with smart machines, and what tradeoffs need to be made to implement such a solution.