HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
<<  <  Page 3/8  >  >>
Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Safety is a problem!
Charles Murray   2/10/2012 6:20:16 PM
NO RATINGS
Watashi: I'll be curious to see where the Prius PHV comes in price-wise. If it comes in under $30K, then it will probably grab some of the Volt's market share. It only offers 13 miles of pure electric operation, but when people have to reach for their wallets at the dealership, that price difference means a lot.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Not just good for the environment
Rob Spiegel   2/10/2012 3:44:41 PM
NO RATINGS
Good point, Watashi. The BP problem could have been solved with decent oversight. Now, popular opinion is going against this form of drilling. With oversight and safe practices, a large portion of risk could be reduced.

Watashi
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Not just good for the environment
Watashi   2/10/2012 3:40:13 PM
NO RATINGS
I concur - There are risks, as BP was so kind to illustrate for us, but the issue quickly becomes sensationalized and makes rational debate almost impossible.  In that climate, policy makers find it easier to do nothing.

The gulf thing really gets me though; we could extract it more safely than our adversaries to the south, but by not drilling we have the same risk of spill without getting any oil in return.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Volt vs. Tesla
Rob Spiegel   2/10/2012 3:38:18 PM
NO RATINGS
Good point, Brentlim. The Tesla buy would also support a new automaker. I'd like to see Tesla become a real factor in the auto industry just to show the industry is not a closed shop. Nice to see that a new idea can still make its way into the market. 

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Not just good for the environment
Rob Spiegel   2/10/2012 3:20:11 PM
NO RATINGS
We don't seem to be dealing with the issue of extraction rationally. We seem to have a mixture of "not in my back yard" and fallout from the BP spill. 

Watashi
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Not just good for the environment
Watashi   2/10/2012 3:01:35 PM
NO RATINGS
Don't forget the massive oil reserves in Alaska, off the east coast, and the Gulf of Mexico that are essentially off limits to us.  Although, Cuba and China are having no issues drilling off of Florida.  These are areas that don't cost as much to extract as the oil shales.

Watashi
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Safety is a problem!
Watashi   2/10/2012 2:43:21 PM
NO RATINGS
@Beth: You have to be careful pushing a product out before it is ready.  Not only the reputation of your company is on the line, but the reputation of the technology itself.

GM perceived a market window for an EV back when they did the EV1.  Its subsequent failure set them back over a decade before trying the electric thing again.  Only now do we see anyone even attempting to bring an EV to market.

I think Toyota had the right idea with the Prius.  They put out a car that was only marginally better than a conventional drive train, in certain circumstances, but it began to socialize the technology.  Hybrids are still not that competitive with gasoline and diesel cars designed for efficiency (unless you do a lot of city driving).  But they have become widely adopted as a status symbol for those who have the money and want to show they care about the environment.

The problem for GM is that Toyota owns that small market segment.  It will be very hard to turn a profit with a little slice of that market unless it expands dramatically; and at the current price point, it will be almost impossible.

JoeS
User Rank
Bronze
Re: Volt vs. Tesla
JoeS   2/10/2012 2:06:28 PM
NO RATINGS
Re: Tesla doing a better job solving the range anxiety problem

I need to disagree.   In the Tesla, you get 160 miles and then you simply are out of energy.  In charged Volt you get about 40 miles from the battery but then it switches to generating electricity from gasoline, using a built in generator that runs at constant speed for efficiency, whcih GM calls the "range extender".   The Volt can use the existing infrastructure (gas stations) and drive clear across the country before recharging, if necessary.  THAT is what gets rid of range anxiety.  Tesla's 160 mile range does not get rid of it.  Try driving one from NYC to Boston (about 300 miles).  At the 160 mile mark you are in the middle of nowhere, certainly no where to recharge.  A Volt can make it all the way easily, using gasoline (at about 40mpg) most of the way.

 

MIROX
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Volt vs. Tesla
MIROX   2/10/2012 1:51:50 PM
NO RATINGS
I believe the issue is NOT Volt versus Tesla, but Chevy versus Cadillac !

Volt is a nice car, and I do like driving it (but only test drives at Volt promo or a car owned by one of our customers) but I do NOT need it, and thus no matter what the price I am not in a market for it.

However if it was a Volt Cadillac, I doubt that anyone would care to discuss the "COST" - while you can buy a Chevy with any and almost all features that you can have on a Cadillac for far less; still thousands of people buy Cady every year.

Same goes for Lexus v Toyota; Infinity v. Nissan; Acura v. Honda or Lincoln v. Ford.

Simply making very expensive Chevy seems to only work if it is a Corvette but not when it is a Volt.

So the Failure of GM marketing is the "brand" positioning, that is unless they plan to have the entry price to Chevy be at "premium".

There are customers for BMW, Mercedes, and even Maybach - while none of them make any "financial" sense if compared solely on "Cost per Mile" to comparable vehicles of other brands that are made in greater volume.

Some people even buy FIAT 500 when for thousands less they could have had bigger, safer and more fuel efficiant car - so PRICE alone, if the car is unique really does not matter that much.

But the BRAND image sure seems to have big effect, just look at MINI versus any other small car that also can be had for thousands less.

 

 

Brentlim
User Rank
Iron
Volt vs. Tesla
Brentlim   2/10/2012 1:25:24 PM
NO RATINGS
Points well made on the Volt. Pricing is deffinitely the concern slowing the Volt going mainstream. For those that can afford the $40K price tag, why not consider the Tesla Model S? for another $10K you can get 160 miles instead of a 40 mile range. Plus, the Model S seats up to 7 instead of just 4. The price is still in the luxury class, but Tesla is doing a much better job of solving the range anxiety problem.

<<  <  Page 3/8  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Advertised as the "Most Powerful Tablet Under $100," the Kindle Fire HD 6 was too tempting for the team at iFixit to pass up. Join us to find out if inexpensive means cheap, irreparable, or just down right economical. It's teardown time!
The first photos made with a 3D-printed telescope are here and they're not as fuzzy as you might expect. A team from the University of Sheffield beat NASA to the goal. The photos of the Moon were made with a reflecting telescope that cost the research team 100 to make (about $161 US).
At Medical Design & Manufacturing Midwest, Joe Wascow told Design News how Optimal Design prototyped a machine that captures the wing-beat of a duck.
The increased adoption of wireless technology for mission-critical applications has revved up the global market for dynamic electronic general purpose (GP) test equipment. As the link between cloud networks and devices -- smartphones, tablets, and notebooks -- results in more complex devices under test, the demand for radio frequency test equipment is starting to intensify.
Much of the research on lithium-ion batteries is focused on how to make the batteries charge more quickly and last longer than they currently do, work that would significantly improve the experience of mobile device users, as well EV and hybrid car drivers. Researchers in Singapore have come up with what seems like the best solution so far -- a battery that can recharge itself in mere minutes and has a potential lifespan of 20 years.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
10/7/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
9/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
9/10/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Oct 20 - 24, How to Design & Build an Embedded Web Server: An Embedded TCP/IP Tutorial
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: 10/28-10/30 11:00 AM
Sponsored by Stratasys
Next Class: 10/28-10/30 2:00 PM
Sponsored by Gates Corporation
Next Class: 11/11-11/13 2:00 PM
Sponsored by Littelfuse
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service