<<  <  Page 3/5  >  >>
User Rank
Re: The KISS Principle
Tim   1/10/2012 7:54:16 PM
Engineers usually try to keep things simple. After multiple design reviews and FMEA's, the once simple idea has double redundancy vision systems, detailed servo monitoring, and WI FI access. The customer is always right, and the customer wants bells and whistles.

User Rank
Re: The KISS Principle
SparkyWatt   1/10/2012 6:30:42 PM
I'm not so sure it should be the other way around.  We have our different domains.  Marketers define the problems, Engineers are the creative problem solvers, and the Bean counters are responsible to make sure the company comes out ahead (so they tell us how far we can go).  If we went at this collaboratively as a team project it might actually work.

The problem is that the short sightedness of modern business has defined Marketing as the voice of God (whatever it takes to get another dollar by the end of the month) and engineering as overhead (we can't have something that pays off next year, it has to pay off tomorrow).  In their quest to make more money now, they eternally demand more with fewer resources.

The thing they don't get is that happy engineers, with clear goals and reasonable limits, create better products.  Stressed people are creative in only one way, getting out from under the stress.  A little elbow room and a few fun side projects will pay off a thousand times over the course of a career.

Alexander Wolfe
User Rank
Re: The KISS Principle
Alexander Wolfe   1/10/2012 6:00:05 PM
Well, this comment and the previous one raise the other "problem" of the real world. Namely, that bean counters and marketing people tell engineers what to do, when we all (all of us engineers, that is) "know" it should be the other way around!

User Rank
Re: The KISS of death
Kevin   1/10/2012 5:26:23 PM
Thanks, Analog Bill!

Here's an article I just read yesterday.  Very timely and pertinent to this article.



User Rank
Re: KISS: Back to Basics; Part 2 – You can’t have everything.
JimT@Future-Product-Innovations   1/10/2012 2:57:21 PM
From your response, I see you've worked in the same departments as me! Happy co-miserating!  Oh, and we can add  6 phases of a project: (1) Enthusiasm; (2) Reality; (3) Panic; (4) Punishment; (5) Praise and Honor for the Non-Participants; (6) Layoff & Unemployment. (hee, hee, heeeeee,,,,,,,) Wait. Why am I laughing-?

User Rank
Re: The KISS Principle
SparkyWatt   1/10/2012 2:17:37 PM
Forget teaching KISS to engineers.  I don't know any engineers who don't know it already.  The issue isn't what the engineers want, it is what they are asked for.  Sure, every engineer has their favorite feature that they would like to add to their products, but they are usually well thought out and if the engineer was allowed to do it their way it would be nicely done.  It may require a Bachelor's Degree to operate it (which is a problem, too), but it would be nicely done.

The real problem is that every product these days has to compete with every other product; not in quality, but in profits.  In order to compete in the profit arena, materials and labor have to be as low as possible and salability has to be as high as possible.  High salability means that your competitors can't offer anything that you don't AND you can offer something they don't.

This leads to a panic effort to reproduce every feature that the competitors have (so they can't use them against you) and add a few of your own.  Of course, you have to have them fast (so the engineers can't do their dilligence).  It is this insane rat race without due thought that is the problem.

We might as well admit that business has painted itself into a corner.  By trying to maximize short term profits, it has sacrificed the ability to make truly competetive products.  By expanding their markets, they have reduced employment, and therefore the number of people who can buy their products.

When we learn that the real purpose of business is to make a LIVING (not make a FORTUNE) things will change.  Only then will the engineers be able to do what they want to do (and only then will we be reigned in from making features that only another engineer can use).

User Rank
Re: The KISS of death
benmlee2   1/10/2012 1:59:51 PM
The irony about car technology we have is that plan jane cheap cars are ultra reliable while the expensive cars have way more problems. Buying any car over $40k is asking for trouble. Engine and transmission technology have come a long way. Engines can easily last more than 200k with practically no maintenance. That is simply amazing.

Get a fancy BMW, Benz, Cadillac or god forbid Land Rover and you are paying $1k for each dealer visit, and they are endless. Get a simple Toyota Yaris (I have), Camary or Honda, and you are set for hundreds of thousands of trouble free driving. Don't even waste money changing oil at 3k. Do it at 7k especially with synthetic. Even the coolant and sparkplug last 100k. Just be sure not to get any more option than you absolutely need.

Analog Bill
User Rank
Re: The KISS of death
Analog Bill   1/10/2012 1:39:59 PM
I couldn't agree more strongly with Kevin. I think the problem has been created entirely by those marketing weasels who have convinced some design engineers to be their partners in crime. We've been drowning in useless features for years ... and this is especially true of software. Just because something CAN be done (add a feature, for example) doesn't mean it SHOULD be done. As an example, I long for some software from Microsoft that even comes close to being intuitive to normal folks (who don't subscribe to their "pretzel logic"). Give me menus for programs that I can customize!  There are "features" in Outlook, for example, that I will never, ever use and would bury deep in the menu tree. Then there are other commands I use constantly but are exasperating to find, and often completely non-intuitive, in their menu structure. Engineers know that simplicity results in reliability ... but marketing folks are simply clueless, I wax nostalgic about DOS programs (some of which I still use) that ran in 500 kB of RAM, ran fast even in a 10 MHz machine, and never, ever froze or crashed. Doesn't anybody actually write machine code anymore? I'd put up with device drivers and IRQ management if I could dump all this modern bloatware!!

Then I can rant about manufacturers who mount "warm and fuzzy" public-relations ads touting how "green conscious" the company is ... as it churns out unrepairable products intentionally designed to have a short lifetime ... heaping all that energy and raw material into a landfill. Does this make any sense?  Of course not, unless you're in management and have no moral compass (ah, but I repeat myself).  It's a sad state of affairs when a new engineer finds himself in this kind of dishonest corporate culture and is expected to crank out ever more irrelevant "feature" laden but non-repairable products ... and still respect himself (or herself) as a citizen of the world. Remember when the Kitchen-Aid brand actually meant something (like simple elegant design, quality materials, and the expectation that the product would last nearly forever). The MBA "hot shots" have put an end of that!

In the end, I'm concerned about a world-wide economic model that absolutely requires an ever-increasing population ("growth") to become mindless consumers of their soon-to-be garbage. What's wrong in this picture?

User Rank
The KISS Principle
WA4DOU   1/10/2012 1:26:35 PM
The KISS principle is time honored and deserves to be taught and stressed to engineers. I'm 64 years old and have been a communications technician (sonar tech in the Navy) for 47 years. I have seen many instances where simple is better for all the reasons some of the other posts suggest. I don't want electronics deciding when my headlights should come on; I want the headlight switch to make a direct connection between my battery and the headlight circuit. Otherwise, electronics may turn my headlights off, just when I need them the most. I want to control my own windshield wipers when I determine the need for them. I don't want electronics determining if and when my engine should stop running, etc. Get the picture? So much of modern electronics is over-engineered, failure prone and unsupported, meaning it's throw away stuff. We are not being well served by all this rush to over-engineering.



Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Counterfeit components
Ann R. Thryft   1/10/2012 12:46:35 PM

Interesting about counterfeit components. That echoes what several vendors told me earlier this year when I was covering machine vision for T&MW: that counterfeit components were becoming a huge problem and that research was being done on what types of vision detection were better or worse for detecting them.

<<  <  Page 3/5  >  >>

Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
It's been two years since the Mac Mini's last appearance on iFixit's teardown table, but a newly revised version joins Apple's lineup this week.
More often than not, with the purchase of a sports car comes the sacrifice of any sort of utility. In other words, you can forget about a large trunk, extra seats for the kids, and more importantly driving in snowy (or inclement) weather. But what if there was a vehicle that offered the best of both worlds; great handling and practicality?
Kevin Gautier of Formlabs describes the making of a carbon fiber mold for an intake manifold, using a $3,300 3D printer, during Medical Design & Manufacturing Midwest.
Science fiction author Isaac Asimov may have the best rules for effective brainstorming and creativity. His never-before-published essay, "On Creativity," recently made it to the Web pages of MIT Technology Review.
Much has been made over the potentially dangerous flammability of lithium-ion batteries after major companies like Boeing, Sony, and Tesla have grappled with well-publicized battery fires. Researchers at Stanford University may have come up with a solution to this problem with a smart sensor for lithium-ion batteries that provides a warning if the battery is about to overheat or catch fire.
Design News Webinar Series
10/7/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
9/25/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
9/10/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
7/23/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Oct 20 - 24, How to Design & Build an Embedded Web Server: An Embedded TCP/IP Tutorial
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6

Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: 10/28-10/30 11:00 AM
Sponsored by Stratasys
Next Class: 10/28-10/30 2:00 PM
Sponsored by Gates Corporation
Next Class: 11/11-11/13 2:00 PM
Sponsored by Littelfuse
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service