HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
<<  <  Page 2/8  >  >>
Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Cellphone ban for drivers?
Rob Spiegel   2/8/2012 11:03:34 AM
NO RATINGS
Yes, it seems that the dash electronics are getting complicated enough that you really need to pull off to the side of the road before using the CUE system.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Cellphone ban for drivers?
Charles Murray   2/7/2012 7:41:30 PM
NO RATINGS
Interestingly, Rob, the Cadillac CUE system is the least distracting that I've seen. I guess the lesson is that it's getting harder to incorporate all this stuff and still maintain safety.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Cellphone ban for drivers?
Rob Spiegel   2/3/2012 12:31:06 PM
NO RATINGS
Nice video, Chuck. Now that's distracting. That has to be at least up there with dialing a cellphone number. And I can't imagine drivers pulling off the road just to change a radio station. That visual screen is far more distracting than the memory buttons on older radios.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Cellphone ban for drivers?
Charles Murray   2/2/2012 8:33:06 PM
NO RATINGS
They seldom deal with suggested use, Rob, but they never, ever fail to talk about safety. Here's a video of a typical explanation.

http://www.designnews.com/video.asp?section_id=1375&doc_id=234436

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Cellphone ban for drivers?
Rob Spiegel   2/2/2012 3:12:03 PM
NO RATINGS
That's interesting, Chuck, that they address safety when introducing the distracting items. Does that also include suggested use? Do they indicate that some of these devices need to be used/adjusted when the car is at a stop?

JamesPDX
User Rank
Iron
Cell Phone Licensing for Vehicle Operators
JamesPDX   2/2/2012 2:09:56 PM
NO RATINGS
All communications equipment have gone through the gantlet of FCC regulations for the most part.  We all understand that the safety of utilizing such equipment is paramount, but there are apparent parties with vested interests in Washington who have a major influence on the regulators when it comes to continuing to fill their deep pockets.

The PTT (referenced by William) button has been of the greatest value in the push for safety minded parties.  All of those operators, whether licensed or not, who use the PTT when communicating, have a far greater record of safety than the drivers who use cell phones.  I am a licensed HAM operator and I use the cell phone while in a vehicle.  When I receive a call while driving, I inform the person on the other end that I am driving and will get back to them shortly, if I am unable pull over safely.  The people who insist on continuing with their conversation are cut off with an apology and a click.  If it is an emergency, then I am more polite about cutting them off.

Inappropriate head turning of the driver to look at a passenger can be viewed from the entertainment industry all the time.  Totally wrong message!

I am a proponent of FCC licensing of cell phone usage while operating any vehicle and violators who put the rest of us in danger and should be punished severely in some manner.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Cellphone ban for drivers?
Charles Murray   2/1/2012 7:58:57 PM
NO RATINGS
William K, I couldn't agree with you more. Automakers will not take away the toys as long as drivers demand them. Every time I attend a press conference for one of these new tiys, the execs carry on for th first 15 minutes about safety, and about how saf their toy is. But if they really wanted greater safety, they wouldn't introduce these things.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Cellphone ban for drivers?
Charles Murray   1/30/2012 7:39:43 PM
NO RATINGS
Jack: When I spoke to researchers recently, they noted that teens are the most likely to exhibit the kind of "inherent politeness" behavior that you describe (this might surprise some parents of teens). Teen drivers tend to want to look at passengers when they talk to them, whereas experienced drivers know it's okay to look straight ahead.

William K.
User Rank
Platinum
would a cellphone ban aid car safety?
William K.   1/28/2012 5:17:59 PM
NO RATINGS
One simple thing that I have suggested in several discussions about cell phone distraction would be to change the drivers communication to full simplex. That would be a PTT (push-to-talk) mode, identical to CB radio operation and the very early mobile phone modes, like in the 1960s. POlice, fire, and taxi communications have been using that mode for at least 60 years, and a great deal is known about how to keep it safe. One additional advantage is that it could reduce power consumption in the mobile device if the transmitter was only on while the user was talking. Of course it would require a huge change in habits, but it might improvepeoples manners, which would be an unintended consequence.

The implementation would definitely be a big deal, so it might not be the very best choice, but it is certainly an interesting possibility.

Jack Rupert, PE
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Cellphone ban for drivers?
Jack Rupert, PE   1/28/2012 2:42:16 PM
NO RATINGS
I like your analysis of the situation William.  In addition, there is the "unconscious concern" (if you will) for the person on the other end of the phone.  If you're reaching for your coffee and something happens on the road, you just don't reach for it.  If you're talking with a passanger and you stop mid-sentence to handle a situation, your passenger is aware.  However, they guy on the other end of phone does not know that anything is going on and will keep the conversation going.  The inherent politeness of people will mean the driver will also try to respond not give 100% to the situation on the road.

<<  <  Page 2/8  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
The promise of the Internet of Things (IoT) is that devices, gadgets, and appliances we use every day will be able to communicate with one another. This potential is not limited to household items or smartphones, but also things we find in our yard and garden, as evidenced by a recent challenge from the element14 design community.
Researchers have developed a new flexible fabric that integrates both movement and sensors, introducing new potential for technology-embedded clothing and soft robots.
Made by Monkeys highlights products that somehow slipped by the QC cops.
If you didn't realize that PowerPoint presentations are inherently hilarious, you have to see Don McMillan take one apart. McMillan -- aka the Technically Funny Comic -- worked for 10 years as an engineer before he switched to stand-up comedy.
The first Tacoma Narrows Bridge was a Washington State suspension bridge that opened in 1940 and spanned the Tacoma Narrows strait of Puget Sound between Tacoma and the Kitsap Peninsula. It opened to traffic on July 1, 1940, and dramatically collapsed into Puget Sound on November 7, just four months after it opened.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
11/19/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
11/6/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
10/7/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Dec 1 - 5, An Introduction to Embedded Software Architecture and Design
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Last Archived Class
Sponsored by Littelfuse
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service