HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Comments
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
<<  <  Page 2/3  >  >>
Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
K-car history
Charles Murray   1/5/2012 10:15:51 PM
NO RATINGS
Wasn't the k-car Lee Iacocca's baby? I believe it was purported to be the car that "saved Chrysler," wasn't it?

Stuart21
User Rank
Gold
Re: Old robot
Stuart21   1/4/2012 10:11:46 AM
NO RATINGS
Or maybe Robot had an argument with Mrs Robot before he went to work?

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
K-Car reliability
Charles Murray   1/3/2012 9:32:09 PM
NO RATINGS
K-cars were notorious for their reliability problems. This is probably one of many issues on that car. Even though there was no recall, I have a feeling that this wasn't an isolated incident.

Alexander Wolfe
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Old Saying
Alexander Wolfe   1/3/2012 9:16:48 AM
NO RATINGS
I personally wouldn't have been so quick to laugh it off. I bought a Chrysler product in the early 1980s, having been a Mopar fan. My bad experience with it led me to Toyotas and Hondas. Once bitten, twice shy.

Amclaussen
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Old Saying
Amclaussen   12/29/2011 12:43:49 PM
NO RATINGS
But if the computer has CAD... and a sadistic monkey in front of it...DISASTER!

Amclaussen
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Old robot
Amclaussen   12/29/2011 12:34:52 PM
Oh yes... the "K" Chryslers were awful in 1981, 82 and partly in 83...

But Chrysler engineers (those at THAT time), took those marginal design cars and started improving them steadily.  By the second generation, The "K" cars were visibly better in most respects.  And By 1990-91 until 1995, the next ones (Dodge Spirit and Plymouth Acclaim) were considered second place ALMOST AS reliable as their competitors (Toyota Camry and Honda Accord) which were the most reliable ones according to several sources, not only "consumer Reviews".

I still have, maintain myself, and truly enjoy my old 1991 Spirit R/T Turbo, which outperforms my (11 years newer Stratus R/T Turbo 2002). The old Spirit is a pleasure to repair or maintain in sad contrast to the Stratus, which is a complete nightmare designed by sadistic monkeys of the worst class. Maybe it is enought to say that the old Spirit has required about half the replacement parts that the Stratus has required in less than half the timespan, but parts are the easy part, not the terrible headache that trying to service the Stratus is.  From radiators that cannot be taken off easily, to engine bays that appear to be designed to IMPEDE a human hand (much less a hand with a handtool) to be introduced into them, to hose clamps orientated in the worst possible direction, the Stratus shines as a monument to Monkey genius, or a tribute to Sadistic Design.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Old robot
Rob Spiegel   12/28/2011 11:00:30 AM
NO RATINGS
Good points Robo Weld. Sounds like a number of things could have caused the weld to hit the wrong spot. The computer running the robot is literal. It will do what it's told, whether the parts are in the right place or not.

jmiller
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Old robot
jmiller   12/28/2011 10:32:49 AM
NO RATINGS
I think the type of mistakes is what differentiates robots from humans.  A robot is going be more consistent.  Therefore, if it is programmed correctly and the task is a repeatable task with little variability the robot will consistently perform the task.  However if you program the robot to do the task 1" off. Iit will do it again and again.

Humans on the other hand have the ability to adjust from situation to situation but the variability in human performance can make it not perfect.

These two simple principles are just a few of the things a good design engineer will realize when they are putting together the design of the part.  How is the part going to be assembled?  Will it be with human labor or automated?  What are the strengths and weaknesses of those assembly techniques and how does your design integrate with them?

 

 

 

Tim
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Old robot
Tim   12/28/2011 9:24:02 AM
NO RATINGS
Robots are only as good as their fixturing. A great robot that has poorly designed or weak end of arm tooling will be non-repeatable and can miss welds or part placement. Part nesting is also a key component to a quality robot cell.

TJ McDermott
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Old robot
TJ McDermott   12/27/2011 10:23:50 PM
NO RATINGS
gafisher, the operative word in your post is "Competent".

<<  <  Page 2/3  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
The engineers and inventors of the post WWII period turned their attention to advancements in electronics, communication, and entertainment. Breakthrough inventions range from LEGOs and computer gaming to the integrated circuit and Ethernet -- a range of advancements that have little in common except they changed our lives.
The age of touch could soon come to an end. From smartphones and smartwatches, to home devices, to in-car infotainment systems, touch is no longer the primary user interface. Technology market leaders are driving a migration from touch to voice as a user interface.
Soft starter technology has become a way to mitigate startup stressors by moderating a motor’s voltage supply during the machine start-up phase, slowly ramping it up and effectively adjusting the machine’s load behavior to protect mechanical components.
A new report from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) makes a start on developing control schemes, process measurements, and modeling and simulation methods for powder bed fusion additive manufacturing.
If you’re developing a product with lots of sensors and no access to the power grid, then you’ll want to take note of a Design News Continuing Education Center class, “Designing Low Power Systems Using Battery and Energy Harvesting Energy Sources."
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
3/31/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
2/25/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
12/11/2014 8:00 a.m. California / 11:00 a.m. New York
5/7/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
May 4 - 8, Designing Low Power Systems using Battery and Energy Harvesting Energy Sources
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Last Archived Class
Sponsored by Proto Labs
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service