HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Comments
View Comments: Newest First|Oldest First|Threaded View
<<  <  Page 2/3  >  >>
Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
K-car history
Charles Murray   1/5/2012 10:15:51 PM
NO RATINGS
Wasn't the k-car Lee Iacocca's baby? I believe it was purported to be the car that "saved Chrysler," wasn't it?

Stuart21
User Rank
Gold
Re: Old robot
Stuart21   1/4/2012 10:11:46 AM
NO RATINGS
Or maybe Robot had an argument with Mrs Robot before he went to work?

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
K-Car reliability
Charles Murray   1/3/2012 9:32:09 PM
NO RATINGS
K-cars were notorious for their reliability problems. This is probably one of many issues on that car. Even though there was no recall, I have a feeling that this wasn't an isolated incident.

Alexander Wolfe
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Old Saying
Alexander Wolfe   1/3/2012 9:16:48 AM
NO RATINGS
I personally wouldn't have been so quick to laugh it off. I bought a Chrysler product in the early 1980s, having been a Mopar fan. My bad experience with it led me to Toyotas and Hondas. Once bitten, twice shy.

Amclaussen
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Old Saying
Amclaussen   12/29/2011 12:43:49 PM
NO RATINGS
But if the computer has CAD... and a sadistic monkey in front of it...DISASTER!

Amclaussen
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Old robot
Amclaussen   12/29/2011 12:34:52 PM
Oh yes... the "K" Chryslers were awful in 1981, 82 and partly in 83...

But Chrysler engineers (those at THAT time), took those marginal design cars and started improving them steadily.  By the second generation, The "K" cars were visibly better in most respects.  And By 1990-91 until 1995, the next ones (Dodge Spirit and Plymouth Acclaim) were considered second place ALMOST AS reliable as their competitors (Toyota Camry and Honda Accord) which were the most reliable ones according to several sources, not only "consumer Reviews".

I still have, maintain myself, and truly enjoy my old 1991 Spirit R/T Turbo, which outperforms my (11 years newer Stratus R/T Turbo 2002). The old Spirit is a pleasure to repair or maintain in sad contrast to the Stratus, which is a complete nightmare designed by sadistic monkeys of the worst class. Maybe it is enought to say that the old Spirit has required about half the replacement parts that the Stratus has required in less than half the timespan, but parts are the easy part, not the terrible headache that trying to service the Stratus is.  From radiators that cannot be taken off easily, to engine bays that appear to be designed to IMPEDE a human hand (much less a hand with a handtool) to be introduced into them, to hose clamps orientated in the worst possible direction, the Stratus shines as a monument to Monkey genius, or a tribute to Sadistic Design.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Old robot
Rob Spiegel   12/28/2011 11:00:30 AM
NO RATINGS
Good points Robo Weld. Sounds like a number of things could have caused the weld to hit the wrong spot. The computer running the robot is literal. It will do what it's told, whether the parts are in the right place or not.

jmiller
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Old robot
jmiller   12/28/2011 10:32:49 AM
NO RATINGS
I think the type of mistakes is what differentiates robots from humans.  A robot is going be more consistent.  Therefore, if it is programmed correctly and the task is a repeatable task with little variability the robot will consistently perform the task.  However if you program the robot to do the task 1" off. Iit will do it again and again.

Humans on the other hand have the ability to adjust from situation to situation but the variability in human performance can make it not perfect.

These two simple principles are just a few of the things a good design engineer will realize when they are putting together the design of the part.  How is the part going to be assembled?  Will it be with human labor or automated?  What are the strengths and weaknesses of those assembly techniques and how does your design integrate with them?

 

 

 

Tim
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Old robot
Tim   12/28/2011 9:24:02 AM
NO RATINGS
Robots are only as good as their fixturing. A great robot that has poorly designed or weak end of arm tooling will be non-repeatable and can miss welds or part placement. Part nesting is also a key component to a quality robot cell.

TJ McDermott
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Old robot
TJ McDermott   12/27/2011 10:23:50 PM
NO RATINGS
gafisher, the operative word in your post is "Competent".

<<  <  Page 2/3  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
On Memorial Day, Americans remember the sacrifices the US armed forces have made, and continue to make, in service to the country. All of us should also consider the developments in technological capabilities and equipment over the years that contribute to the success of our military operations.
Imagine if you could train it from San Francisco to New York faster than flying?
In order to keep in line with safety protocols, industrial networks need to be filtered in a semantic way so that only information related to diagnostics is flowing back to the vendor and that any communications that could be used for remote machine operations are suppressed.
Siemens PLM has launched an online store to help customers search for, compare, and purchase partner-developed apps for its Solid Edge software.
Advanced visualization can depict an entire plant in motion, while also detailing an individual workstation. Individual products can be rendered different for each discipline involved — marketing, engineering, or suppliers.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
5/21/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
5/7/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
3/31/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
6/11/2015 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Jun 8 - 12, Everything You Ever Wanted to Know about Filters
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Course June 2nd-4th:
Sponsored by Proto Labs
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service