HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
REGISTER   |   LOGIN   |   HELP
<<  <  Page 4/4
kcp
User Rank
Silver
Re: Color me skeptical
kcp   12/9/2011 11:29:57 AM
NO RATINGS
The numbers may be biased, and it's most likely true that most of the jobs gained by the use of robots are high-tech jobs.  I take issue with those who question the morality of companies using robots instead of hiring blue-collar labor to do the same job.  To claim that someone is putting a "spin" on the numbers is to imply that someone is doing something evil that they want to paint as being good.

Alexander Wolfe
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Color me skeptical
Alexander Wolfe   12/9/2011 10:43:12 AM
NO RATINGS
Thanks for your comment, kcp. You make a valid Ron Paul-sian point,. My comment expressing skepticism about the job numbers in the survey wasn't meant to argue one way or another the issue about who should or shouldn't provide jobs. It was simply to say that the numbers bandied about didn't seem to make sense.

kcp
User Rank
Silver
Re: Color me skeptical
kcp   12/9/2011 9:40:44 AM
NO RATINGS
How's this for a spin:  Manufacturing companies do not exist for the purpose of employing unskilled labor.  They exist to make products that people want to buy at a price they're willing to pay, and to provide profits for shareholders, like me.

One should not expect companies to provide jobs for people with few skills anymore than one should expect companies to lower their prices so that people with little money can afford their products.  Or would you like them to cut corners in order to do so, like making products that don't last, are full of defects, or are unsafe?  You don't get something for nothing.

The expectations placed on automotive manufacturers to produce better, faster, safer, more durable, more fuel efficient, cleaner, cheaper, and yet larger vehicles requires engineering know-how, expensive equipment, and - yes- robots.  It doesn't require more unskilled hands.

 

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Color me skeptical
Charles Murray   12/8/2011 8:48:37 PM
NO RATINGS
Assuming robots create jobs, isn't it the case they are creating a new breed of jobs? Likely for someone who's more educated? If I have a high level of education and/or technical training, I would imagine there wouldn't be an issue. If I'm low on the education/training scale, I would imagine times could be tougher. Is that the case, Rob?

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Color me skeptical
Rob Spiegel   12/8/2011 2:15:30 PM
NO RATINGS

Yes, I can understand the skepticism. The study wisely chose to not make the claim that the robotics industry was creating more jobs than it was eliminating. It's not inconceivable, though. Many economists argued that the computer industry spent decades displacing jobs -- from clerical to technical -- rather than delivering a net reduction in jobs. Some claim the computer industry didn't actually begin reducing jobs until the late 80s or early 90s.


Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Color me skeptical
Ann R. Thryft   12/8/2011 12:35:34 PM
NO RATINGS

I'm also skeptical, as I would be about statements that jobs are being created in any industry, since they are also being taken away on a  regular basis, by robots or by other factors and trends. And I'm even more skeptical when an industry association tells me that something the industry's doing is really not harmful, especially if there's been a hint that it is harmful. That sounds like spin. For one thing, assuming the displacement from blue-collar to technical jobs is true, it still means that a lot of blue-collar workers are out of a job? Whether there's a net loss or a net gain is anyone's guess. And saying that robots do jobs humans wouldn't do because they are too dangerous--uh, humans will do those jobs anyway if they need to be done. For example, miners in West Virginia.


Jennifer Campbell
User Rank
Gold
Re: Color me skeptical
Jennifer Campbell   12/8/2011 11:21:41 AM
NO RATINGS
And to take the skepticism to another level - it makes sense that the jobs making robots will, more than likely, soon be taken over by robots. Don't you think?

Alexander Wolfe
User Rank
Blogger
Color me skeptical
Alexander Wolfe   12/8/2011 10:28:48 AM
NO RATINGS
I'm a skeptic here. First off, the demarcation between robots creating jobs and the robotics industry creating jobs is not really clear. If it's the latter, yeah, sure, there are going to be jobs making robots. As well, to say that there are going to be 1 million jobs created -- well, I'm not sure that number is all that impressive in the context of the number of jobs that'll be made obsolete by robots. I should caveat this by saying I support the robots industry. I'm just saying that the gross-level economic argument set forth in this story is not as impressive as it's made out to be.

Beth Stackpole
User Rank
Blogger
Jobs-creation vehicle
Beth Stackpole   12/8/2011 9:09:24 AM
NO RATINGS
It's great to see that the robotics industry is taking off and serving a jobs-creation vehicle. Hopefully many of those jobs are in the United States and not just offshore. Just so I'm clear, the bulk of the jobs creation the study cites is related to jobs at the robotics technology companies, not at the end user sites actually putting the robots to work in industrial applications.

<<  <  Page 4/4


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Eric Chesak created a sensor that can detect clouds, and it can also measure different sources of radiation.
Festo's BionicKangaroo combines pneumatic and electrical drive technology, plus very precise controls and condition monitoring. Like a real kangaroo, the BionicKangaroo robot harvests the kinetic energy of each takeoff and immediately uses it to power the next jump.
Practicing engineers have not heeded Yoda's words.
Design News and Digi-Key presents: Creating & Testing Your First RTOS Application Using MQX, a crash course that will look at defining a project, selecting a target processor, blocking code, defining tasks, completing code, and debugging.
Rockwell Automation recently unveiled a new safety relay that can be configured and integrated through existing software to program safety logic in devices.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
3/27/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York / 7:00 p.m. London
2/27/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York / 7:00 p.m. London
12/18/2013 Available On Demand
11/20/2013 Available On Demand
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Apr 21 - 25, Creating & Testing Your First RTOS Application Using MQX
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: April 29 - Day 1
Sponsored by maxon precision motors
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service