HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
<<  <  Page 5/6  >  >>
Jessie P, PE
User Rank
Iron
Typo?
Jessie P, PE   11/17/2011 9:27:40 AM
NO RATINGS
I think they meant to say two gallons per second, not minute. That would be comparable to a stream rather than a mediocre indoor plumbing faucet.

makatak
User Rank
Iron
Hydro power
makatak   11/17/2011 9:24:14 AM
NO RATINGS
How many hoops did they have to jump through to get permits for zoning, excavation, disruption of "wetlands", don't step on this beetle, utility easements, etc. These are the real cahllenges to a project of this type. The technical part is simple!

Beth Stackpole
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Micro
Beth Stackpole   11/17/2011 6:44:13 AM
NO RATINGS
I agree that there needs to be support and commitment at the micro level. The challenging economic climate of the last few years has definitely fanned the flames of the local movement and a do-it-yourself mentality. Perhaps that will translate into more people attempting projects as ambitious as this one.

Sawmill Engineer
User Rank
Iron
Details, please!!
Sawmill Engineer   11/16/2011 9:34:20 PM
NO RATINGS
What wasn't clear to me is if they generated single phase or three phase power.  Why the three motors?  15hp is about equal to 20kW, so any one motor could have been a generator.  Can anyone fill in the blanks here?

Also, I'm curious what prompted the report--it does read suspiciously like an Automation Direct ad....

But a very interesting read. 

Jon.

 

letsthink
User Rank
Iron
Re: The numbers don't add up; But it's cool
letsthink   11/16/2011 6:00:17 PM
NO RATINGS
the big system earns;

20KW ~= $2/hour == $17000 per year if it runs 24/365;  pretty nice!

The other cool thing is that the Dad figured this out long ago, and the sons discovered it and made it happen!  Nice one!

Dave Palmer
User Rank
Platinum
Re: The numbers don't add up;
Dave Palmer   11/16/2011 3:50:20 PM
NO RATINGS
@letsthink: I agree with you that the numbers don't add up.  If 40 cubic feet per second of water (18,000 gallons per minute) falling 10 feet generates 20 kW, then 2 gallons per minute falling 2 feet should generate about 1/90,000 as much power, or 0.2 W.  Maybe you could make a LED light up with this.

letsthink
User Rank
Iron
The numbers don't add up;
letsthink   11/16/2011 3:15:45 PM
NO RATINGS
Two gallons per minute is a far cry from; 

average of 40 cubic feet per second flowed through the pond, making it a marginally feasible hydroelectric project

So now everybody is getting all fired up to dump two gallons, let it run down into another bucket, then dump that water back up to the top and expect to make the electric meter run backwards!!

 

 

Lauren Muskett
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Connected to the grid
Lauren Muskett   11/16/2011 2:53:26 PM
NO RATINGS
This case study is interesting and a good read. Even though it took a lot of effort and time they are already seeing a return on their investment, which is always a good thing. 

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Micro
Charles Murray   11/16/2011 1:13:45 PM
NO RATINGS
If renewables are going to make a significant impact, a certain percentage of the power and a certain percentage of the storage will have to happen on the micro level. This is a great effort and it's a perfect example of what can happen at that micro level.

Ann R. Thryft
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Connected to the grid
Ann R. Thryft   11/16/2011 12:16:42 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree, Rob, this sure eliminates the storage problem. And it's heartening to read that the minimum for generating hydroelectric power is only a two-foot drop and two gallons per minute. That's a lot less than I would have guessed.

I've often wondered if we could generate power from the creek in back of our house. At least part of the year, it fulfills those minimum requirements. 

<<  <  Page 5/6  >  >>


Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Researchers in the United Kingdom have found a sustainable way to derive hydrogen from grass to develop biofuel.
Without failure and loss, there is no success. Sadly, some failures and losses are greater than others. That’s certainly true of engineer and Space Race astronaut Gus Grissom.
Siemens and Fraunhofer Institute for Laser Technology have achieved a faster production process based on selective laser melting for speeding up the prototyping of big, complex metal parts in gas turbine engines.
Researchers in China have developed a new material that mimics coral that could help remove toxic heavy metals like mercury from the ocean.
The popularity of Pokemon Go may be break open a new rush of augmented reality products.
More:Blogs|News
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Jul 11 - 15, Embedded System Design Techniques™ - Debugging Real-time Embedded Software – Hands on
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7 | 8 | 9 | 10


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2016 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service