HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
  |  REGISTER  |  LOGIN  |  HELP
Beth Stackpole
User Rank
Blogger
Re: CAD Prowess
Beth Stackpole   11/23/2011 8:55:19 AM
NO RATINGS
I think the CAD-ready parts selection catalog along with Google-like search functionality is going to increasingly be incorporated as part of a core PLM platform. As you well note, it just makes good sense.

Alexander Wolfe
User Rank
Blogger
Re: CAD Prowess
Alexander Wolfe   11/23/2011 8:45:18 AM
NO RATINGS
I think all working engineers should have at their disposal a portfolio of parts search and selection sites. The Siemens portal discussed here is a great idea. I'd also like to point interested readers to a new parts search site started recently by Design News parent company UBM Electronics. It's DataSheets.com

If you do check it out, please send me feedback on your user experience. Email me at alex.wolfe@ubm.com

Beth Stackpole
User Rank
Blogger
Re: CAD Prowess
Beth Stackpole   11/15/2011 5:57:48 PM
NO RATINGS
Chuck, this parts portal is really aimed at CAD users--SolidEdge is Siemens' more small-company friendly CAD tool compared with its big guns offering, NX. So the answer is yes, smaller companies would take advantage of this kind of capability and some are even moving beyond CAD to a full PLM vision of product development. It's typically small steps, but the offerings are far more small and mid-size company friendly in terms of price and packaging. And truthfully, many of these small and mid-size firms are really seeking out the competitive advantages PLM can deliver. So I don't think any of this is out of reach.

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: CAD Prowess
Charles Murray   11/15/2011 10:16:38 AM
NO RATINGS
Beth: I concur with Rob's comment. Are mid- and small-sized engineering offices likely to deploy those tools? Also, has any other PLM software offered this capability in the past?

Beth Stackpole
User Rank
Blogger
Re: CAD Prowess
Beth Stackpole   11/15/2011 10:08:13 AM
NO RATINGS
Rob, I don't think something like this CAD parts portal would necessarily be considered cutting-edge--helpful, yes. Life changing, not likely. This particular announcement just makes it easier for design teams to source and select parts and incorporate the 3D models of those parts directly into their design. More of a time-saver/convenience function so they don't have to rekey in geometries and spend too much time on busy work.

PLM, on the other hand, is far more cutting edge. I think your observations are right in that adoption is certainly not as widespread as CAD. However, PLM has been around for a good decade and it's definitely moved far beyond just being used by the mega automotive and aerospace firms to being adopted by smaller manufacturers who see value in centralizing and sharing product-related data as well as adopting cross-functional engineering workflows.

Rob Spiegel
User Rank
Blogger
Re: CAD Prowess
Rob Spiegel   11/15/2011 9:26:56 AM
NO RATINGS
Is this technology getting adopted widely, Beth? I would imagine a great number of small- to mid-size manufacturers are not equipped to deploy these tools. Maybe I'm wrong. It's cool stuff, but I'm curious about whether these are the tools of large bleeding-edge early adopters or whether these tools are likely to become widely used.

Beth Stackpole
User Rank
Blogger
Re: CAD Prowess
Beth Stackpole   11/15/2011 7:45:00 AM
NO RATINGS
I agree that end-to-end CAD prowess is no longer a competitive advantage and that companies are definitely coming up to speed on PLM and its surrounding benefits fairly quickly.

You would be surprised, however, to note how many companies are still stuck in that very early PLM stage--really still product data management, all about managing the CAD models and data eminating specifically from engineering. While I don't mean to downplay the difficulty of getting this part of the vision right, companies really need to move quickly on next PLM steps, broadening the footprint to include other types of product-related data in the repository and creating cross-functional workflows. It's only with that complete vision that companies really see quantifiable gains in terms of design innovation and efficiencies.

Alexander Wolfe
User Rank
Blogger
CAD Prowess
Alexander Wolfe   11/15/2011 7:14:19 AM
NO RATINGS
I think we're getting to the point where having in-house expertise in end-to-end CAD is no longer a competitive advantage, but rather de rigeur. Nearly everyone is coming up the PLM curve, on the user side, so if you're NOT fully engaged, you're at a disadvantage. Which I guess makes product/vendor selection all the more difficult for those who still havent bought in.



Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Earlier this year paralyzed IndyCar drive Sam Schmidt did the seemingly impossible -- opening the qualifying rounds at Indy by driving a modified Corvette C7 Stingray around the Indianapolis Motor Speedway.
As companies rush into IoT connectivity, the choice of doing it yourself or using a platform from a service company becomes a major issue.
Wearables are changing the way we see ourselves. With onboard sensors that have access to our bodies, we are starting to know our physical selves like never before, quantifying our activity, our heart rate, breathing, and even our muscle effort.
Last week, the bill for reforming chemical regulation, the TSCA Modernization Act of 2015, passed the House. If it or a similar bill becomes law, the effects on cost and availability of adhesives and plastics incorporating these substances are not yet clear.
This year, Design News is getting a head start on the Fourth of July celebration. In honor of our country and its legacy of engineering innovation -- in all of its forms -- we are taking you on an alphabetical tour through all 50 states to showcase interesting engineering breakthroughs and historically significant events.
More:Blogs|News
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Jul 6 - 10, Building Raspberry Pi Controllers with Python
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6 |  7


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Copyright © 2015 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service