HOME  |  NEWS  |  BLOGS  |  MESSAGES  |  FEATURES  |  VIDEOS  |  WEBINARS  |  INDUSTRIES  |  FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
REGISTER   |   LOGIN   |   HELP
williamlweaver
User Rank
Platinum
Truer Words
williamlweaver   10/26/2011 9:53:17 AM
NO RATINGS
This is Canonical Stuff. These words are valuable to all, regardless of their position within the Innovation Process. The only tweak I would make is to retire the antiquated term "Multi-Disciplinary" and replace it with "Interdisciplinary". Having a multitude of electrical components in a collection can be impressive, but it is not until they are integrated into a cohesive product that the magic can emerge. Interdisciplinary teams already appreciate, respect, and value the contributions from other disciplines, including the front office and customers.

We have already evolved from assembly lines, through predict, budget and prepare, and are well onto leading through innovation. This style of project management that specifically incorporates customers into the project has been championed by eXtreme Programming and other Agile Software Development methods. We would be wise to learn from their best practices.

 

Jack Rupert, PE
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Truer Words
Jack Rupert, PE   10/26/2011 1:49:37 PM
NO RATINGS
Absolutely!  This should be Marketing for Engineers 101 (or maybe Engineering for Marketing 101).  Too many times we try to tell the customer what they want.  Steve Jobs made a successful career out of that, but for most places listening to the customer is where it's at.

arenasolutions
User Rank
Iron
Minimum Viable Products + Customer Feedback = Innovation
arenasolutions   10/26/2011 9:22:03 PM
NO RATINGS
I completely agree with this post. Your customers may not know exactly what form their wants, needs should take, but you probably do! (If you take the time to listen to what they're saying.) 

We have actually moved toward a MVP model in the last year with some of our new products, and it has allowed us to work with customers to discover interesting use cases, and be much more innovative and customer focused. 

We detail our model here - http://bit.ly/ts6wVi

Charles Murray
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Minimum Viable Products + Customer Feedback = Innovation
Charles Murray   11/17/2011 9:54:39 PM
NO RATINGS
To arenasolutions: Excellent point. Your customers really don't know what form the solution will take. That's why engineering teams need to be able to understand and interpret customer needs and figure out how to get from A to B. Apple's customers could never have described the interfaces that eventually took up residence on the iPhone and iPad. But Steve Jobs understood their needs and and created a technology that met those needs.

bradk
User Rank
Iron
Re: Minimum Viable Products + Customer Feedback = Innovation
bradk   1/2/2012 3:42:03 PM
NO RATINGS
1 saves
We have also moved toward a MVP model in our company during the past few months.  We have found that it has worked well with our customers.  I think it is very important to always listen tou your audince when marketing a message.


vimalkumarp
User Rank
Gold
value creation in innovation
vimalkumarp   10/26/2011 11:13:22 PM
NO RATINGS
But it is more important to have a value creation or value add index so as to attract the attention of the customer

 



Partner Zone
Latest Analysis
Eric Chesak created a sensor that can detect clouds, and it can also measure different sources of radiation.
Festo's BionicKangaroo combines pneumatic and electrical drive technology, plus very precise controls and condition monitoring. Like a real kangaroo, the BionicKangaroo robot harvests the kinetic energy of each takeoff and immediately uses it to power the next jump.
Practicing engineers have not heeded Yoda's words.
Design News and Digi-Key presents: Creating & Testing Your First RTOS Application Using MQX, a crash course that will look at defining a project, selecting a target processor, blocking code, defining tasks, completing code, and debugging.
Rockwell Automation recently unveiled a new safety relay that can be configured and integrated through existing software to program safety logic in devices.
More:Blogs|News
Design News Webinar Series
3/27/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York / 7:00 p.m. London
2/27/2014 11:00 a.m. California / 2:00 p.m. New York / 7:00 p.m. London
12/18/2013 Available On Demand
11/20/2013 Available On Demand
Quick Poll
The Continuing Education Center offers engineers an entirely new way to get the education they need to formulate next-generation solutions.
Apr 21 - 25, Creating & Testing Your First RTOS Application Using MQX
SEMESTERS: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5


Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.
Next Class: April 29 - Day 1
Sponsored by maxon precision motors
Learn More   |   Login   |   Archived Classes
Twitter Feed
Design News Twitter Feed
Like Us on Facebook

Sponsored Content

Technology Marketplace

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Copyright © 2014 UBM Canon, A UBM company, All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service